'Old Hens Make the Best Soup'

Accounting for the Earning Process and the IASB/FASB Attempts to Reform Revenue Recognition Accounting Standards

Yuri Biondi, Eiko Tsujiyama, Jonathan Glover, Nicole T. Jenkins, Bjorn Jorgensen, John Lacey, Richard Macve

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    By developing a synthesis of documents that have been released officially under the revenue recognition project jointly run by the International Accounting Standards Board and Financial Accounting Standards Board, this article points out that the earning generation and realization process over time (that is to say, the traditional accounting model) is in reality still playing an important role without losing its raison d'être. Although this model is supposed to have been consistently rejected since the outset on the premise of the adoption of the assets and liabilities approach amid the Boards' attempt to establish a new revenue recognition model, this article aims to reconfirm the significance and validity of this earning process - that is, the corporate process of generating and realizing earnings over time - as the representational focus of accounting for revenue recognition. Through an internal critique, our article summarizes and discusses successive Boards' proposals under the same asset-liability approach that they have been advocating for revenue recognition. Through a comprehensive comparative analysis (external critique), our article further criticizes the usefulness and feasibility of this approach, especially the transfer-of-control basis of revenue recognition which the Boards propose. It argues then for an alternative approach that combines asset-liability with revenue-expense accounting while re-establishing focus upon the earning process over time.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)13-33
    Number of pages21
    JournalAccounting in Europe
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    International Accounting Standards Board
    Revenue recognition
    Accounting standards
    Liability
    Assets
    Financial accounting standards
    Comparative analysis
    Usefulness
    Expenses
    Revenue

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Accounting
    • Business and International Management
    • Finance

    Cite this

    'Old Hens Make the Best Soup' : Accounting for the Earning Process and the IASB/FASB Attempts to Reform Revenue Recognition Accounting Standards. / Biondi, Yuri; Tsujiyama, Eiko; Glover, Jonathan; Jenkins, Nicole T.; Jorgensen, Bjorn; Lacey, John; Macve, Richard.

    In: Accounting in Europe, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2014, p. 13-33.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Biondi, Yuri ; Tsujiyama, Eiko ; Glover, Jonathan ; Jenkins, Nicole T. ; Jorgensen, Bjorn ; Lacey, John ; Macve, Richard. / 'Old Hens Make the Best Soup' : Accounting for the Earning Process and the IASB/FASB Attempts to Reform Revenue Recognition Accounting Standards. In: Accounting in Europe. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 13-33.
    @article{95ef707b425c4ef28c99665fad2241b7,
    title = "'Old Hens Make the Best Soup': Accounting for the Earning Process and the IASB/FASB Attempts to Reform Revenue Recognition Accounting Standards",
    abstract = "By developing a synthesis of documents that have been released officially under the revenue recognition project jointly run by the International Accounting Standards Board and Financial Accounting Standards Board, this article points out that the earning generation and realization process over time (that is to say, the traditional accounting model) is in reality still playing an important role without losing its raison d'{\^e}tre. Although this model is supposed to have been consistently rejected since the outset on the premise of the adoption of the assets and liabilities approach amid the Boards' attempt to establish a new revenue recognition model, this article aims to reconfirm the significance and validity of this earning process - that is, the corporate process of generating and realizing earnings over time - as the representational focus of accounting for revenue recognition. Through an internal critique, our article summarizes and discusses successive Boards' proposals under the same asset-liability approach that they have been advocating for revenue recognition. Through a comprehensive comparative analysis (external critique), our article further criticizes the usefulness and feasibility of this approach, especially the transfer-of-control basis of revenue recognition which the Boards propose. It argues then for an alternative approach that combines asset-liability with revenue-expense accounting while re-establishing focus upon the earning process over time.",
    author = "Yuri Biondi and Eiko Tsujiyama and Jonathan Glover and Jenkins, {Nicole T.} and Bjorn Jorgensen and John Lacey and Richard Macve",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1080/17449480.2014.903718",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "13--33",
    journal = "Accounting in Europe",
    issn = "1744-9480",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - 'Old Hens Make the Best Soup'

    T2 - Accounting for the Earning Process and the IASB/FASB Attempts to Reform Revenue Recognition Accounting Standards

    AU - Biondi, Yuri

    AU - Tsujiyama, Eiko

    AU - Glover, Jonathan

    AU - Jenkins, Nicole T.

    AU - Jorgensen, Bjorn

    AU - Lacey, John

    AU - Macve, Richard

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - By developing a synthesis of documents that have been released officially under the revenue recognition project jointly run by the International Accounting Standards Board and Financial Accounting Standards Board, this article points out that the earning generation and realization process over time (that is to say, the traditional accounting model) is in reality still playing an important role without losing its raison d'être. Although this model is supposed to have been consistently rejected since the outset on the premise of the adoption of the assets and liabilities approach amid the Boards' attempt to establish a new revenue recognition model, this article aims to reconfirm the significance and validity of this earning process - that is, the corporate process of generating and realizing earnings over time - as the representational focus of accounting for revenue recognition. Through an internal critique, our article summarizes and discusses successive Boards' proposals under the same asset-liability approach that they have been advocating for revenue recognition. Through a comprehensive comparative analysis (external critique), our article further criticizes the usefulness and feasibility of this approach, especially the transfer-of-control basis of revenue recognition which the Boards propose. It argues then for an alternative approach that combines asset-liability with revenue-expense accounting while re-establishing focus upon the earning process over time.

    AB - By developing a synthesis of documents that have been released officially under the revenue recognition project jointly run by the International Accounting Standards Board and Financial Accounting Standards Board, this article points out that the earning generation and realization process over time (that is to say, the traditional accounting model) is in reality still playing an important role without losing its raison d'être. Although this model is supposed to have been consistently rejected since the outset on the premise of the adoption of the assets and liabilities approach amid the Boards' attempt to establish a new revenue recognition model, this article aims to reconfirm the significance and validity of this earning process - that is, the corporate process of generating and realizing earnings over time - as the representational focus of accounting for revenue recognition. Through an internal critique, our article summarizes and discusses successive Boards' proposals under the same asset-liability approach that they have been advocating for revenue recognition. Through a comprehensive comparative analysis (external critique), our article further criticizes the usefulness and feasibility of this approach, especially the transfer-of-control basis of revenue recognition which the Boards propose. It argues then for an alternative approach that combines asset-liability with revenue-expense accounting while re-establishing focus upon the earning process over time.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899577086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899577086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/17449480.2014.903718

    DO - 10.1080/17449480.2014.903718

    M3 - Article

    VL - 11

    SP - 13

    EP - 33

    JO - Accounting in Europe

    JF - Accounting in Europe

    SN - 1744-9480

    IS - 1

    ER -