On the Meiji Restoration

Japan's search for sovereignty?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is generally taken for granted that the Meiji Restoration was a watershed event that incorporated Japan into the modern sovereign state system. This conventional wisdom is misleading. The Japanese political system that existed prior to the Meiji Restoration, the so-called Tokugawa Baku-Han regime, was comparable with many modern sovereign states in its exercise of public authority and its ability to control cross-border movements. Furthermore, as Krasner has shown, sovereignty itself is a problematic concept, the fundamental norms and principles of which are frequently violated. A case study of the 1862 incident known as Namamugi Jiken demonstrates how Japan was recognized and treated internationally, revealing that while some aspects of Japan's sovereignty were conveniently violated, other sovereignty norms were certainly respected by the Western nations. These norms constrained the range of choices available to the key actors involved in this incident and thus significantly affected the subsequent course of events, which ultimately led to Tokugawa's collapse in 1868. Hence, it was the complex (hypocritical) nature of Japan's existent sovereignty, and not its absence, that explains why the Meiji Restoration occurred the way it actually did.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-283
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001 Aug 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

restoration
sovereignty
Japan
incident
event
public authorities
political system
wisdom
regime
Sovereignty
Restoration
ability
Incidents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

On the Meiji Restoration : Japan's search for sovereignty? / Kohno, Masaru.

In: International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 1, No. 2, 01.08.2001, p. 265-283.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{770f5b29120449fbb1d9f320e62ccdd1,
title = "On the Meiji Restoration: Japan's search for sovereignty?",
abstract = "It is generally taken for granted that the Meiji Restoration was a watershed event that incorporated Japan into the modern sovereign state system. This conventional wisdom is misleading. The Japanese political system that existed prior to the Meiji Restoration, the so-called Tokugawa Baku-Han regime, was comparable with many modern sovereign states in its exercise of public authority and its ability to control cross-border movements. Furthermore, as Krasner has shown, sovereignty itself is a problematic concept, the fundamental norms and principles of which are frequently violated. A case study of the 1862 incident known as Namamugi Jiken demonstrates how Japan was recognized and treated internationally, revealing that while some aspects of Japan's sovereignty were conveniently violated, other sovereignty norms were certainly respected by the Western nations. These norms constrained the range of choices available to the key actors involved in this incident and thus significantly affected the subsequent course of events, which ultimately led to Tokugawa's collapse in 1868. Hence, it was the complex (hypocritical) nature of Japan's existent sovereignty, and not its absence, that explains why the Meiji Restoration occurred the way it actually did.",
author = "Masaru Kohno",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/irap/1.2.265",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "265--283",
journal = "International Relations of the Asia-Pacific",
issn = "1470-482X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Meiji Restoration

T2 - Japan's search for sovereignty?

AU - Kohno, Masaru

PY - 2001/8/1

Y1 - 2001/8/1

N2 - It is generally taken for granted that the Meiji Restoration was a watershed event that incorporated Japan into the modern sovereign state system. This conventional wisdom is misleading. The Japanese political system that existed prior to the Meiji Restoration, the so-called Tokugawa Baku-Han regime, was comparable with many modern sovereign states in its exercise of public authority and its ability to control cross-border movements. Furthermore, as Krasner has shown, sovereignty itself is a problematic concept, the fundamental norms and principles of which are frequently violated. A case study of the 1862 incident known as Namamugi Jiken demonstrates how Japan was recognized and treated internationally, revealing that while some aspects of Japan's sovereignty were conveniently violated, other sovereignty norms were certainly respected by the Western nations. These norms constrained the range of choices available to the key actors involved in this incident and thus significantly affected the subsequent course of events, which ultimately led to Tokugawa's collapse in 1868. Hence, it was the complex (hypocritical) nature of Japan's existent sovereignty, and not its absence, that explains why the Meiji Restoration occurred the way it actually did.

AB - It is generally taken for granted that the Meiji Restoration was a watershed event that incorporated Japan into the modern sovereign state system. This conventional wisdom is misleading. The Japanese political system that existed prior to the Meiji Restoration, the so-called Tokugawa Baku-Han regime, was comparable with many modern sovereign states in its exercise of public authority and its ability to control cross-border movements. Furthermore, as Krasner has shown, sovereignty itself is a problematic concept, the fundamental norms and principles of which are frequently violated. A case study of the 1862 incident known as Namamugi Jiken demonstrates how Japan was recognized and treated internationally, revealing that while some aspects of Japan's sovereignty were conveniently violated, other sovereignty norms were certainly respected by the Western nations. These norms constrained the range of choices available to the key actors involved in this incident and thus significantly affected the subsequent course of events, which ultimately led to Tokugawa's collapse in 1868. Hence, it was the complex (hypocritical) nature of Japan's existent sovereignty, and not its absence, that explains why the Meiji Restoration occurred the way it actually did.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937334887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937334887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/irap/1.2.265

DO - 10.1093/irap/1.2.265

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 265

EP - 283

JO - International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

JF - International Relations of the Asia-Pacific

SN - 1470-482X

IS - 2

ER -