Potentialities for a regional public participation framework in Asia

An environmental assessment perspective

Akira Ogihara, Mikiko Shimaoka, Hitomi Roppongi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study attempts to investigate the potential to develop a regional framework of public participation (PP) in environmental assessments (EA) within Asia. In so-doing, this paper examines the status quo of public participation in EA within Asia from a legislative point of view. The existing situation of EA in Asia is first examined, followed by an analysis on the status and challenges of PP within the region's environmental assessments. Eight Asian countries subject for this research have all implemented EA at different degrees, yet challenges of enforcement remain. Possible solutions to these challenges are to first improve and standardize the legal framework and implementation mechanism in each individual country, as a first step leading to a transboundary framework in Asia. PP within EA is legally defined in some countries, but it is not widely practiced. Multi-stakeholder process is suggested as a potential tool that comprehensively covers the components necessary for PP promotion. There are information gaps between countries, which could be improved by creating a regional agency governing information exchange. Limited collaboration among countries, likewise, could be improved by bilateral or multilateral environmental agreements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-542
Number of pages8
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume52
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Mar 1

Fingerprint

environmental assessment
participation
information exchange
stakeholders
public participation
Asia
legislation
stakeholder
promotion

Keywords

  • Accessto information
  • Environmental impact assessment (EIA)
  • Multi-stakeholder process (MSP)
  • Public participation
  • Strategic environmental assessment (SEA)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Potentialities for a regional public participation framework in Asia : An environmental assessment perspective. / Ogihara, Akira; Shimaoka, Mikiko; Roppongi, Hitomi.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 52, 01.03.2016, p. 535-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7e0ab9cd397495a8922e3fd3d17f0d5,
title = "Potentialities for a regional public participation framework in Asia: An environmental assessment perspective",
abstract = "This study attempts to investigate the potential to develop a regional framework of public participation (PP) in environmental assessments (EA) within Asia. In so-doing, this paper examines the status quo of public participation in EA within Asia from a legislative point of view. The existing situation of EA in Asia is first examined, followed by an analysis on the status and challenges of PP within the region's environmental assessments. Eight Asian countries subject for this research have all implemented EA at different degrees, yet challenges of enforcement remain. Possible solutions to these challenges are to first improve and standardize the legal framework and implementation mechanism in each individual country, as a first step leading to a transboundary framework in Asia. PP within EA is legally defined in some countries, but it is not widely practiced. Multi-stakeholder process is suggested as a potential tool that comprehensively covers the components necessary for PP promotion. There are information gaps between countries, which could be improved by creating a regional agency governing information exchange. Limited collaboration among countries, likewise, could be improved by bilateral or multilateral environmental agreements.",
keywords = "Accessto information, Environmental impact assessment (EIA), Multi-stakeholder process (MSP), Public participation, Strategic environmental assessment (SEA)",
author = "Akira Ogihara and Mikiko Shimaoka and Hitomi Roppongi",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.029",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "535--542",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potentialities for a regional public participation framework in Asia

T2 - An environmental assessment perspective

AU - Ogihara, Akira

AU - Shimaoka, Mikiko

AU - Roppongi, Hitomi

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - This study attempts to investigate the potential to develop a regional framework of public participation (PP) in environmental assessments (EA) within Asia. In so-doing, this paper examines the status quo of public participation in EA within Asia from a legislative point of view. The existing situation of EA in Asia is first examined, followed by an analysis on the status and challenges of PP within the region's environmental assessments. Eight Asian countries subject for this research have all implemented EA at different degrees, yet challenges of enforcement remain. Possible solutions to these challenges are to first improve and standardize the legal framework and implementation mechanism in each individual country, as a first step leading to a transboundary framework in Asia. PP within EA is legally defined in some countries, but it is not widely practiced. Multi-stakeholder process is suggested as a potential tool that comprehensively covers the components necessary for PP promotion. There are information gaps between countries, which could be improved by creating a regional agency governing information exchange. Limited collaboration among countries, likewise, could be improved by bilateral or multilateral environmental agreements.

AB - This study attempts to investigate the potential to develop a regional framework of public participation (PP) in environmental assessments (EA) within Asia. In so-doing, this paper examines the status quo of public participation in EA within Asia from a legislative point of view. The existing situation of EA in Asia is first examined, followed by an analysis on the status and challenges of PP within the region's environmental assessments. Eight Asian countries subject for this research have all implemented EA at different degrees, yet challenges of enforcement remain. Possible solutions to these challenges are to first improve and standardize the legal framework and implementation mechanism in each individual country, as a first step leading to a transboundary framework in Asia. PP within EA is legally defined in some countries, but it is not widely practiced. Multi-stakeholder process is suggested as a potential tool that comprehensively covers the components necessary for PP promotion. There are information gaps between countries, which could be improved by creating a regional agency governing information exchange. Limited collaboration among countries, likewise, could be improved by bilateral or multilateral environmental agreements.

KW - Accessto information

KW - Environmental impact assessment (EIA)

KW - Multi-stakeholder process (MSP)

KW - Public participation

KW - Strategic environmental assessment (SEA)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958533311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958533311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.029

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.029

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 535

EP - 542

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -