Power and negotiation: Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations

Paul Guyot, Alexis Drogoul, Shinichi Honiden

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Participatory simulations are conducted to improve our knowledge of human behaviors, to help in solving conflicts, to shape interaction protocols between humans and to teach some aspects of collective management. Agent-based participatory simulations differ from other kinds of participatory simulations including role playing games and experimental economics simulations. The control architecture of the agents, in these simulations, is more or less integrally replaced by a human player and the interactions between players are limited by the communication protocols designed for the agents, usually the exchange of electronic messages logged for further analysis. Such systems can be considered as ideal multi-agent systems featuring cognitive and intelligent agents. Previous work demonstrated that running this kind of simulations helps to design and improve multi-agent simulations. In this paper, we present a series of agent-based participatory experiments studying negotiation in an abstract case of common resource pool management. The roles were designed in such a way that conflicts should emerge during the negotiations. Observing the behavior of human players, we noticed the apparition of power relations between players. We observed that this power in negotiations was unrelated to any a priori dependence between agents or between roles but was instead drawn from strategies and, more surprisingly, this power was built on an emerging ontology.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
Pages27-33
Number of pages7
Volume2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Dec 1
Externally publishedYes
EventFifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS - Hakodate
Duration: 2006 May 82006 May 12

Other

OtherFifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS
CityHakodate
Period06/5/806/5/12

Fingerprint

Network protocols
Intelligent agents
Multi agent systems
Ontology
Economics
Experiments

Keywords

  • Agent-based simulations
  • Negotiations
  • Participatory simulations
  • Power relations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Guyot, P., Drogoul, A., & Honiden, S. (2006). Power and negotiation: Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (Vol. 2006, pp. 27-33) https://doi.org/10.1145/1160633.1160636

Power and negotiation : Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations. / Guyot, Paul; Drogoul, Alexis; Honiden, Shinichi.

Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Vol. 2006 2006. p. 27-33.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Guyot, P, Drogoul, A & Honiden, S 2006, Power and negotiation: Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations. in Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. vol. 2006, pp. 27-33, Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS, Hakodate, 06/5/8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1160633.1160636
Guyot P, Drogoul A, Honiden S. Power and negotiation: Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Vol. 2006. 2006. p. 27-33 https://doi.org/10.1145/1160633.1160636
Guyot, Paul ; Drogoul, Alexis ; Honiden, Shinichi. / Power and negotiation : Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Vol. 2006 2006. pp. 27-33
@inproceedings{51caddff89ad412799ec4245c513caba,
title = "Power and negotiation: Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations",
abstract = "Participatory simulations are conducted to improve our knowledge of human behaviors, to help in solving conflicts, to shape interaction protocols between humans and to teach some aspects of collective management. Agent-based participatory simulations differ from other kinds of participatory simulations including role playing games and experimental economics simulations. The control architecture of the agents, in these simulations, is more or less integrally replaced by a human player and the interactions between players are limited by the communication protocols designed for the agents, usually the exchange of electronic messages logged for further analysis. Such systems can be considered as ideal multi-agent systems featuring cognitive and intelligent agents. Previous work demonstrated that running this kind of simulations helps to design and improve multi-agent simulations. In this paper, we present a series of agent-based participatory experiments studying negotiation in an abstract case of common resource pool management. The roles were designed in such a way that conflicts should emerge during the negotiations. Observing the behavior of human players, we noticed the apparition of power relations between players. We observed that this power in negotiations was unrelated to any a priori dependence between agents or between roles but was instead drawn from strategies and, more surprisingly, this power was built on an emerging ontology.",
keywords = "Agent-based simulations, Negotiations, Participatory simulations, Power relations",
author = "Paul Guyot and Alexis Drogoul and Shinichi Honiden",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1145/1160633.1160636",
language = "English",
isbn = "1595933034",
volume = "2006",
pages = "27--33",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Power and negotiation

T2 - Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations

AU - Guyot, Paul

AU - Drogoul, Alexis

AU - Honiden, Shinichi

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Participatory simulations are conducted to improve our knowledge of human behaviors, to help in solving conflicts, to shape interaction protocols between humans and to teach some aspects of collective management. Agent-based participatory simulations differ from other kinds of participatory simulations including role playing games and experimental economics simulations. The control architecture of the agents, in these simulations, is more or less integrally replaced by a human player and the interactions between players are limited by the communication protocols designed for the agents, usually the exchange of electronic messages logged for further analysis. Such systems can be considered as ideal multi-agent systems featuring cognitive and intelligent agents. Previous work demonstrated that running this kind of simulations helps to design and improve multi-agent simulations. In this paper, we present a series of agent-based participatory experiments studying negotiation in an abstract case of common resource pool management. The roles were designed in such a way that conflicts should emerge during the negotiations. Observing the behavior of human players, we noticed the apparition of power relations between players. We observed that this power in negotiations was unrelated to any a priori dependence between agents or between roles but was instead drawn from strategies and, more surprisingly, this power was built on an emerging ontology.

AB - Participatory simulations are conducted to improve our knowledge of human behaviors, to help in solving conflicts, to shape interaction protocols between humans and to teach some aspects of collective management. Agent-based participatory simulations differ from other kinds of participatory simulations including role playing games and experimental economics simulations. The control architecture of the agents, in these simulations, is more or less integrally replaced by a human player and the interactions between players are limited by the communication protocols designed for the agents, usually the exchange of electronic messages logged for further analysis. Such systems can be considered as ideal multi-agent systems featuring cognitive and intelligent agents. Previous work demonstrated that running this kind of simulations helps to design and improve multi-agent simulations. In this paper, we present a series of agent-based participatory experiments studying negotiation in an abstract case of common resource pool management. The roles were designed in such a way that conflicts should emerge during the negotiations. Observing the behavior of human players, we noticed the apparition of power relations between players. We observed that this power in negotiations was unrelated to any a priori dependence between agents or between roles but was instead drawn from strategies and, more surprisingly, this power was built on an emerging ontology.

KW - Agent-based simulations

KW - Negotiations

KW - Participatory simulations

KW - Power relations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247227622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247227622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1160633.1160636

DO - 10.1145/1160633.1160636

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:34247227622

SN - 1595933034

SN - 9781595933034

VL - 2006

SP - 27

EP - 33

BT - Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

ER -