Privatization of the Japan National Railway: overview of performance changes

F. Mizutani, K. Nakamura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1987, the Japanese National Railway (JNR) was privatized and separated into six JR passenger rail companies and one nationwide JR freight rail company. The main purpose of this paper is to outline how JNR's privatization came about and to examine the JRs' performances in the ten years after privatization. Distinguishing features of the JNR privatization are as follows: horizontal separation (or regional subdivision); passenger-freight separation; vertical integration (or operation and infrastructure integration); lump-sum subsidy for low density JRs; establishment of an Intermediary Institution; and allowance of non-rail business. The JRs have improved performance in many areas, such as financial status, overall service quality, labor productivity, and operating costs. Accident rates did not increase after privatization. Although fares had been increasing almost yearly before privatization, fares did not increase for nine years afterwards. However, many challenges remain, such as the liquidation of JMR's long-term debts, the sale of the remaining JR stock, financial difficulties among the three islands JRs due to a decrease in fund revenues, and the nagging lack of competitiveness at JR Freight. In general, however, the privatization process has led to increased productivity and efficiency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-99
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Transport Economics
Volume24
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Privatization
privatization
railway
German Federal Railways
Japan
performance
Rails
pricing
Productivity
liquidation
vertical integration
Industry
labor productivity
operating costs
debt
sale
Operating costs
competitiveness
subsidy
indebtedness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Transportation

Cite this

Privatization of the Japan National Railway : overview of performance changes. / Mizutani, F.; Nakamura, K.

In: International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1997, p. 75-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0721d2eb4ded4dcabbe9f6758432d4a6,
title = "Privatization of the Japan National Railway: overview of performance changes",
abstract = "In 1987, the Japanese National Railway (JNR) was privatized and separated into six JR passenger rail companies and one nationwide JR freight rail company. The main purpose of this paper is to outline how JNR's privatization came about and to examine the JRs' performances in the ten years after privatization. Distinguishing features of the JNR privatization are as follows: horizontal separation (or regional subdivision); passenger-freight separation; vertical integration (or operation and infrastructure integration); lump-sum subsidy for low density JRs; establishment of an Intermediary Institution; and allowance of non-rail business. The JRs have improved performance in many areas, such as financial status, overall service quality, labor productivity, and operating costs. Accident rates did not increase after privatization. Although fares had been increasing almost yearly before privatization, fares did not increase for nine years afterwards. However, many challenges remain, such as the liquidation of JMR's long-term debts, the sale of the remaining JR stock, financial difficulties among the three islands JRs due to a decrease in fund revenues, and the nagging lack of competitiveness at JR Freight. In general, however, the privatization process has led to increased productivity and efficiency.",
author = "F. Mizutani and K. Nakamura",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "75--99",
journal = "International Journal of Transport Economics",
issn = "0391-8440",
publisher = "Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale Srl.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privatization of the Japan National Railway

T2 - overview of performance changes

AU - Mizutani, F.

AU - Nakamura, K.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - In 1987, the Japanese National Railway (JNR) was privatized and separated into six JR passenger rail companies and one nationwide JR freight rail company. The main purpose of this paper is to outline how JNR's privatization came about and to examine the JRs' performances in the ten years after privatization. Distinguishing features of the JNR privatization are as follows: horizontal separation (or regional subdivision); passenger-freight separation; vertical integration (or operation and infrastructure integration); lump-sum subsidy for low density JRs; establishment of an Intermediary Institution; and allowance of non-rail business. The JRs have improved performance in many areas, such as financial status, overall service quality, labor productivity, and operating costs. Accident rates did not increase after privatization. Although fares had been increasing almost yearly before privatization, fares did not increase for nine years afterwards. However, many challenges remain, such as the liquidation of JMR's long-term debts, the sale of the remaining JR stock, financial difficulties among the three islands JRs due to a decrease in fund revenues, and the nagging lack of competitiveness at JR Freight. In general, however, the privatization process has led to increased productivity and efficiency.

AB - In 1987, the Japanese National Railway (JNR) was privatized and separated into six JR passenger rail companies and one nationwide JR freight rail company. The main purpose of this paper is to outline how JNR's privatization came about and to examine the JRs' performances in the ten years after privatization. Distinguishing features of the JNR privatization are as follows: horizontal separation (or regional subdivision); passenger-freight separation; vertical integration (or operation and infrastructure integration); lump-sum subsidy for low density JRs; establishment of an Intermediary Institution; and allowance of non-rail business. The JRs have improved performance in many areas, such as financial status, overall service quality, labor productivity, and operating costs. Accident rates did not increase after privatization. Although fares had been increasing almost yearly before privatization, fares did not increase for nine years afterwards. However, many challenges remain, such as the liquidation of JMR's long-term debts, the sale of the remaining JR stock, financial difficulties among the three islands JRs due to a decrease in fund revenues, and the nagging lack of competitiveness at JR Freight. In general, however, the privatization process has led to increased productivity and efficiency.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030679750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030679750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030679750

VL - 24

SP - 75

EP - 99

JO - International Journal of Transport Economics

JF - International Journal of Transport Economics

SN - 0391-8440

IS - 1

ER -