Pro- and anti-whaling discourses in British and Japanese newspaper reports in comparison: A cross-cultural perspective

Kumiko Murata

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article compares and contrasts the discourse of whaling in British and Japanese newspaper reports. It investigates the ways in which pro- and anti-whaling discourses are formulated in the press by examining, in particular, the following features: (1) the use of specific lexis and syntactic structures, (2) the use of rhetorical devices, and (3) the control and organization of information at a discourse level. The article claims that British and Japanese news reports use very different strategies in expressing their anti- and pro-whaling stances; the former tend to use a more emotive and provocative tone, whereas the latter use a more restrained and factual tone. The article also claims that the issue of whaling tends to be discussed under different cultural assumptions and values in the respective discourses; and thus, suggests the possibility that readers may be influenced by the cumulative effects of these different discourses.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)741-764
    Number of pages24
    JournalDiscourse and Society
    Volume18
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007 Nov

    Keywords

    • Critical discourse analysis
    • Cross-cultural communication
    • Ecology
    • English and Japanese
    • NeWs discourse
    • Whaling
    • Written discourse

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Communication
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pro- and anti-whaling discourses in British and Japanese newspaper reports in comparison: A cross-cultural perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this