Proposal of analysis method of the worst accidents reasons (AMWAR) for product safety to clarify the worst accident scenarios when using consumer products

Hattan Altiyare, Akinori Komatsubara

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Accidents due to the misuse of consumer products are the main concern in this study. Currently, the traditional risk assessment processes such as the ISO/IEC 51 guide have been proposed for industrial machines. However, designers and safety managers for consumer products tend to relay on their experiences to conduct risk assessment. The reason is that the workload could be high because, with the traditional risk assessment processes, all risks including acceptable level of risk are evaluated for the targeted product. To solve this problem, we have developed the analysis method for worst accidents reasons (AMWAR), which is based on the concept of sabotage analysis focusing only on high-risk accidents. A case study was conducted using people with little experience in risk assessment to determine whether or not they could find out accident scenarios with AMWAR. A company survey was also conducted to evaluate AMWAR by people in charge of product safety. During the case study, the participants managed to forecast many accident scenarios. In the company survey, AMWAR was approved as a risk assessment method that could help reduce the workload. It was also suggested that AMWAR could be used as an educational tool for risk assessment and could be applied in all manufacturing stages of the product; especially those which newly developed without an accident history at the market.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)182-189
    Number of pages8
    JournalJournal of Japan Industrial Management Association
    Volume66
    Issue number2E
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Consumer products
    Accidents
    Safety
    Scenarios
    Risk Assessment
    Risk assessment
    Workload
    Product safety
    Relay
    Forecast
    Industry
    Managers
    Manufacturing
    History
    Charge
    Tend

    Keywords

    • Product safety
    • Risk finding
    • Sabotage analysis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
    • Applied Mathematics
    • Management Science and Operations Research
    • Strategy and Management

    Cite this

    @article{5ca8ec8719b241d3a89b3f288f3e621f,
    title = "Proposal of analysis method of the worst accidents reasons (AMWAR) for product safety to clarify the worst accident scenarios when using consumer products",
    abstract = "Accidents due to the misuse of consumer products are the main concern in this study. Currently, the traditional risk assessment processes such as the ISO/IEC 51 guide have been proposed for industrial machines. However, designers and safety managers for consumer products tend to relay on their experiences to conduct risk assessment. The reason is that the workload could be high because, with the traditional risk assessment processes, all risks including acceptable level of risk are evaluated for the targeted product. To solve this problem, we have developed the analysis method for worst accidents reasons (AMWAR), which is based on the concept of sabotage analysis focusing only on high-risk accidents. A case study was conducted using people with little experience in risk assessment to determine whether or not they could find out accident scenarios with AMWAR. A company survey was also conducted to evaluate AMWAR by people in charge of product safety. During the case study, the participants managed to forecast many accident scenarios. In the company survey, AMWAR was approved as a risk assessment method that could help reduce the workload. It was also suggested that AMWAR could be used as an educational tool for risk assessment and could be applied in all manufacturing stages of the product; especially those which newly developed without an accident history at the market.",
    keywords = "Product safety, Risk finding, Sabotage analysis",
    author = "Hattan Altiyare and Akinori Komatsubara",
    year = "2015",
    language = "English",
    volume = "66",
    pages = "182--189",
    journal = "Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association",
    issn = "0386-4812",
    publisher = "Nihon Keikei Kogakkai",
    number = "2E",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Proposal of analysis method of the worst accidents reasons (AMWAR) for product safety to clarify the worst accident scenarios when using consumer products

    AU - Altiyare, Hattan

    AU - Komatsubara, Akinori

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Accidents due to the misuse of consumer products are the main concern in this study. Currently, the traditional risk assessment processes such as the ISO/IEC 51 guide have been proposed for industrial machines. However, designers and safety managers for consumer products tend to relay on their experiences to conduct risk assessment. The reason is that the workload could be high because, with the traditional risk assessment processes, all risks including acceptable level of risk are evaluated for the targeted product. To solve this problem, we have developed the analysis method for worst accidents reasons (AMWAR), which is based on the concept of sabotage analysis focusing only on high-risk accidents. A case study was conducted using people with little experience in risk assessment to determine whether or not they could find out accident scenarios with AMWAR. A company survey was also conducted to evaluate AMWAR by people in charge of product safety. During the case study, the participants managed to forecast many accident scenarios. In the company survey, AMWAR was approved as a risk assessment method that could help reduce the workload. It was also suggested that AMWAR could be used as an educational tool for risk assessment and could be applied in all manufacturing stages of the product; especially those which newly developed without an accident history at the market.

    AB - Accidents due to the misuse of consumer products are the main concern in this study. Currently, the traditional risk assessment processes such as the ISO/IEC 51 guide have been proposed for industrial machines. However, designers and safety managers for consumer products tend to relay on their experiences to conduct risk assessment. The reason is that the workload could be high because, with the traditional risk assessment processes, all risks including acceptable level of risk are evaluated for the targeted product. To solve this problem, we have developed the analysis method for worst accidents reasons (AMWAR), which is based on the concept of sabotage analysis focusing only on high-risk accidents. A case study was conducted using people with little experience in risk assessment to determine whether or not they could find out accident scenarios with AMWAR. A company survey was also conducted to evaluate AMWAR by people in charge of product safety. During the case study, the participants managed to forecast many accident scenarios. In the company survey, AMWAR was approved as a risk assessment method that could help reduce the workload. It was also suggested that AMWAR could be used as an educational tool for risk assessment and could be applied in all manufacturing stages of the product; especially those which newly developed without an accident history at the market.

    KW - Product safety

    KW - Risk finding

    KW - Sabotage analysis

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940975173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940975173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84940975173

    VL - 66

    SP - 182

    EP - 189

    JO - Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association

    JF - Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association

    SN - 0386-4812

    IS - 2E

    ER -