Prosody helps L1 speakers but confuses L2 learners

Influence of L+H* Pitch accent on referential ambiguity resolution

Chie Nakamura, Manabu Arai, Yuki Hirose, Suzanne Flynn

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

Abstract

Numerous studies have reported an effect of prosodic information on initial parsing decision. However, whether prosody functions in the same way in adult second language (L2) sentence processing is not known. In visual world eyetracking experiments, we investigated the influence of contrastive intonation and visual context on processing locally ambiguous sentences with L1 speakers (native English speakers) and L2 learners (Japanese adult learners of English). Our results showed that referential visual context alone helped both L1 speakers and L2 learners to correctly analyze the sentence structure. Interestingly, however, the results also revealed that contrastive intonation accompanied by referential visual context facilitated the correct interpretation with L1 speakers but misled L2 learners “down a garden path”. L2 learners did not interpret the contrastive intonation as a cue that highlights a contrastive set in the visual scene. Instead, they interpreted the contrastive intonation as a simple emphasis and adopted the incorrect syntactic analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-581
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody
Volume2016-January
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes
Event8th Speech Prosody 2016 - Boston, United States
Duration: 2016 May 312016 Jun 3

Fingerprint

interpretation
experiment
language
Ambiguity Resolution
Contrastive
Prosody
Referential
Pitch Accent
L2 Learners
Intonation
Sentence Processing
Experiment
Language
English Speakers
Parsing
Syntactic Analysis
Adult Learners
Visual World
Native Speaker

Keywords

  • Contrastive prosody
  • Eye-tracking
  • Garden-path
  • Referential ambiguity resolution
  • Second language acquisition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Prosody helps L1 speakers but confuses L2 learners : Influence of L+H* Pitch accent on referential ambiguity resolution. / Nakamura, Chie; Arai, Manabu; Hirose, Yuki; Flynn, Suzanne.

In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody, Vol. 2016-January, 01.01.2016, p. 577-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference article

@article{fa6603167482455daf8c517a2ae4eee5,
title = "Prosody helps L1 speakers but confuses L2 learners: Influence of L+H* Pitch accent on referential ambiguity resolution",
abstract = "Numerous studies have reported an effect of prosodic information on initial parsing decision. However, whether prosody functions in the same way in adult second language (L2) sentence processing is not known. In visual world eyetracking experiments, we investigated the influence of contrastive intonation and visual context on processing locally ambiguous sentences with L1 speakers (native English speakers) and L2 learners (Japanese adult learners of English). Our results showed that referential visual context alone helped both L1 speakers and L2 learners to correctly analyze the sentence structure. Interestingly, however, the results also revealed that contrastive intonation accompanied by referential visual context facilitated the correct interpretation with L1 speakers but misled L2 learners “down a garden path”. L2 learners did not interpret the contrastive intonation as a cue that highlights a contrastive set in the visual scene. Instead, they interpreted the contrastive intonation as a simple emphasis and adopted the incorrect syntactic analysis.",
keywords = "Contrastive prosody, Eye-tracking, Garden-path, Referential ambiguity resolution, Second language acquisition",
author = "Chie Nakamura and Manabu Arai and Yuki Hirose and Suzanne Flynn",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "2016-January",
pages = "577--581",
journal = "Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody",
issn = "2333-2042",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosody helps L1 speakers but confuses L2 learners

T2 - Influence of L+H* Pitch accent on referential ambiguity resolution

AU - Nakamura, Chie

AU - Arai, Manabu

AU - Hirose, Yuki

AU - Flynn, Suzanne

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Numerous studies have reported an effect of prosodic information on initial parsing decision. However, whether prosody functions in the same way in adult second language (L2) sentence processing is not known. In visual world eyetracking experiments, we investigated the influence of contrastive intonation and visual context on processing locally ambiguous sentences with L1 speakers (native English speakers) and L2 learners (Japanese adult learners of English). Our results showed that referential visual context alone helped both L1 speakers and L2 learners to correctly analyze the sentence structure. Interestingly, however, the results also revealed that contrastive intonation accompanied by referential visual context facilitated the correct interpretation with L1 speakers but misled L2 learners “down a garden path”. L2 learners did not interpret the contrastive intonation as a cue that highlights a contrastive set in the visual scene. Instead, they interpreted the contrastive intonation as a simple emphasis and adopted the incorrect syntactic analysis.

AB - Numerous studies have reported an effect of prosodic information on initial parsing decision. However, whether prosody functions in the same way in adult second language (L2) sentence processing is not known. In visual world eyetracking experiments, we investigated the influence of contrastive intonation and visual context on processing locally ambiguous sentences with L1 speakers (native English speakers) and L2 learners (Japanese adult learners of English). Our results showed that referential visual context alone helped both L1 speakers and L2 learners to correctly analyze the sentence structure. Interestingly, however, the results also revealed that contrastive intonation accompanied by referential visual context facilitated the correct interpretation with L1 speakers but misled L2 learners “down a garden path”. L2 learners did not interpret the contrastive intonation as a cue that highlights a contrastive set in the visual scene. Instead, they interpreted the contrastive intonation as a simple emphasis and adopted the incorrect syntactic analysis.

KW - Contrastive prosody

KW - Eye-tracking

KW - Garden-path

KW - Referential ambiguity resolution

KW - Second language acquisition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982908233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982908233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

VL - 2016-January

SP - 577

EP - 581

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody

JF - Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody

SN - 2333-2042

ER -