Re-politicising Philosophy of Science: A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate how we can reunite social philosophy and philosophy of science to address problems in science and technology. First, referring to Don Howard's, George Reisch's, and Philip Mirowski's works, I shall briefly explain how philosophy of science was depoliticised during the cold war. Second, I shall examine Steve Fuller's criticism of Thomas Kuhn. Third, I shall scrutinise Philip Kitcher's view of well-ordered science. Fourth, I shall emphasise the importance of autonomy and argue that philosophy of science needs to cultivate a critical attitude towards authority. Fifth, drawing upon Ian Jarvie's social reading of Karl Popper, I shall argue that Popper's philosophy can be a model for reuniting social philosophy and philosophy of science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)365-378
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Epistemology
Volume26
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Oct
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

philosophy of science
epistemology
social philosophy
science
cold war
criticism
autonomy
Social Epistemology
Philosophy of Science
Social philosophy

Keywords

  • Cold War
  • Depoliticisation
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Social Philosophy
  • Specialisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Re-politicising Philosophy of Science : A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology. / Yoshida, Kei.

In: Social Epistemology, Vol. 26, No. 3-4, 10.2012, p. 365-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dd0311d1c7124629b7013c1d71a76586,
title = "Re-politicising Philosophy of Science: A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to investigate how we can reunite social philosophy and philosophy of science to address problems in science and technology. First, referring to Don Howard's, George Reisch's, and Philip Mirowski's works, I shall briefly explain how philosophy of science was depoliticised during the cold war. Second, I shall examine Steve Fuller's criticism of Thomas Kuhn. Third, I shall scrutinise Philip Kitcher's view of well-ordered science. Fourth, I shall emphasise the importance of autonomy and argue that philosophy of science needs to cultivate a critical attitude towards authority. Fifth, drawing upon Ian Jarvie's social reading of Karl Popper, I shall argue that Popper's philosophy can be a model for reuniting social philosophy and philosophy of science.",
keywords = "Cold War, Depoliticisation, Philosophy of Science, Social Philosophy, Specialisation",
author = "Kei Yoshida",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1080/02691728.2012.727190",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "365--378",
journal = "Social Epistemology",
issn = "0269-1728",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-politicising Philosophy of Science

T2 - A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology

AU - Yoshida, Kei

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - The aim of this paper is to investigate how we can reunite social philosophy and philosophy of science to address problems in science and technology. First, referring to Don Howard's, George Reisch's, and Philip Mirowski's works, I shall briefly explain how philosophy of science was depoliticised during the cold war. Second, I shall examine Steve Fuller's criticism of Thomas Kuhn. Third, I shall scrutinise Philip Kitcher's view of well-ordered science. Fourth, I shall emphasise the importance of autonomy and argue that philosophy of science needs to cultivate a critical attitude towards authority. Fifth, drawing upon Ian Jarvie's social reading of Karl Popper, I shall argue that Popper's philosophy can be a model for reuniting social philosophy and philosophy of science.

AB - The aim of this paper is to investigate how we can reunite social philosophy and philosophy of science to address problems in science and technology. First, referring to Don Howard's, George Reisch's, and Philip Mirowski's works, I shall briefly explain how philosophy of science was depoliticised during the cold war. Second, I shall examine Steve Fuller's criticism of Thomas Kuhn. Third, I shall scrutinise Philip Kitcher's view of well-ordered science. Fourth, I shall emphasise the importance of autonomy and argue that philosophy of science needs to cultivate a critical attitude towards authority. Fifth, drawing upon Ian Jarvie's social reading of Karl Popper, I shall argue that Popper's philosophy can be a model for reuniting social philosophy and philosophy of science.

KW - Cold War

KW - Depoliticisation

KW - Philosophy of Science

KW - Social Philosophy

KW - Specialisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871325011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871325011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02691728.2012.727190

DO - 10.1080/02691728.2012.727190

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84871325011

VL - 26

SP - 365

EP - 378

JO - Social Epistemology

JF - Social Epistemology

SN - 0269-1728

IS - 3-4

ER -