Recurrent Word Combinations in EAP Test-Taker Writing: Differences between High- and Low-Proficiency Levels

Randy Appel, David Wood*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The correct use of frequently occurring word combinations represents an important part of language proficiency in spoken and written discourse. This study investigates the use of English-language recurrent word combinations in low-level and high-level L2 English academic essays sourced from the Canadian Academic English Language (CAEL) assessment. Quantitative and qualitative measures of analysis were used to investigate how L2 English writers of differing proficiency levels made use of recurrent word combinations in their writing. Results indicate that low-level writers tend to use more stance and discourse-organizing expressions in their essays, and more of these identified expressions also appear in the articles included as part of the test materials (i.e., suggesting that low-level writers used verbatim copying as a test-taking strategy). High-level writers were found to be less dependent on the included reading articles and made greater use of referential bundles in their writing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-71
Number of pages17
JournalLanguage Assessment Quarterly
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 2
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recurrent Word Combinations in EAP Test-Taker Writing: Differences between High- and Low-Proficiency Levels'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this