Regional differences in temperature sensation and thermal comfort in humans

Mayumi Nakamura, Tamae Yoda, Larry I. Crawshaw, Saki Yasuhara, Yasuyo Saito, Momoko Kasuga, Kei Nagashima, Kazuyuki Kanosue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sensations evoked by thermal stimulation (temperature-related sensations) can be divided into two categories, "temperature sensation" and "thermal comfort." Although several studies have investigated regional differences in temperature sensation, less is known about the sensitivity differences in thermal comfort for the various body regions. In the present study, we examined regional differences in temperature-related sensations with special attention to thermal comfort. Healthy male subjects sitting in an environment of mild heat or cold were locally cooled or warmed with water-perfused stimulators. Areas stimulated were the face, chest, abdomen, and thigh. Temperature sensation and thermal comfort of the stimulated areas were reported by the subjects, as was whole body thermal comfort. During mild heat exposure, facial cooling was most comfortable and facial warming was most uncomfortable. On the other hand, during mild cold exposure, neither warming nor cooling of the face had a major effect. The chest and abdomen had characteristics opposite to those of the face. Local warming of the chest and abdomen did produce a strong comfort sensation during whole body cold exposure. The thermal comfort seen in this study suggests that if given the chance, humans would preferentially cool the head in the heat, and they would maintain the warmth of the trunk areas in the cold. The qualitative differences seen in thermal comfort for the various areas cannot be explained solely by the density or properties of the peripheral thermal receptors and thus must reflect processing mechanisms in the central nervous system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1897-1906
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume105
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Dec

Fingerprint

Hot Temperature
Temperature
Abdomen
Thorax
Body Regions
Thigh
Healthy Volunteers
Central Nervous System
Head
Water

Keywords

  • Cold exposure
  • Heat exposure
  • Skin temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Regional differences in temperature sensation and thermal comfort in humans. / Nakamura, Mayumi; Yoda, Tamae; Crawshaw, Larry I.; Yasuhara, Saki; Saito, Yasuyo; Kasuga, Momoko; Nagashima, Kei; Kanosue, Kazuyuki.

In: Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 105, No. 6, 12.2008, p. 1897-1906.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nakamura M, Yoda T, Crawshaw LI, Yasuhara S, Saito Y, Kasuga M et al. Regional differences in temperature sensation and thermal comfort in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2008 Dec;105(6):1897-1906. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90466.2008
Nakamura, Mayumi ; Yoda, Tamae ; Crawshaw, Larry I. ; Yasuhara, Saki ; Saito, Yasuyo ; Kasuga, Momoko ; Nagashima, Kei ; Kanosue, Kazuyuki. / Regional differences in temperature sensation and thermal comfort in humans. In: Journal of Applied Physiology. 2008 ; Vol. 105, No. 6. pp. 1897-1906.
@article{7800d23e5acd494487b3ea95f41ade32,
title = "Regional differences in temperature sensation and thermal comfort in humans",
abstract = "Sensations evoked by thermal stimulation (temperature-related sensations) can be divided into two categories, {"}temperature sensation{"} and {"}thermal comfort.{"} Although several studies have investigated regional differences in temperature sensation, less is known about the sensitivity differences in thermal comfort for the various body regions. In the present study, we examined regional differences in temperature-related sensations with special attention to thermal comfort. Healthy male subjects sitting in an environment of mild heat or cold were locally cooled or warmed with water-perfused stimulators. Areas stimulated were the face, chest, abdomen, and thigh. Temperature sensation and thermal comfort of the stimulated areas were reported by the subjects, as was whole body thermal comfort. During mild heat exposure, facial cooling was most comfortable and facial warming was most uncomfortable. On the other hand, during mild cold exposure, neither warming nor cooling of the face had a major effect. The chest and abdomen had characteristics opposite to those of the face. Local warming of the chest and abdomen did produce a strong comfort sensation during whole body cold exposure. The thermal comfort seen in this study suggests that if given the chance, humans would preferentially cool the head in the heat, and they would maintain the warmth of the trunk areas in the cold. The qualitative differences seen in thermal comfort for the various areas cannot be explained solely by the density or properties of the peripheral thermal receptors and thus must reflect processing mechanisms in the central nervous system.",
keywords = "Cold exposure, Heat exposure, Skin temperature",
author = "Mayumi Nakamura and Tamae Yoda and Crawshaw, {Larry I.} and Saki Yasuhara and Yasuyo Saito and Momoko Kasuga and Kei Nagashima and Kazuyuki Kanosue",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1152/japplphysiol.90466.2008",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "1897--1906",
journal = "Journal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental and Exercise Physiology",
issn = "8750-7587",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional differences in temperature sensation and thermal comfort in humans

AU - Nakamura, Mayumi

AU - Yoda, Tamae

AU - Crawshaw, Larry I.

AU - Yasuhara, Saki

AU - Saito, Yasuyo

AU - Kasuga, Momoko

AU - Nagashima, Kei

AU - Kanosue, Kazuyuki

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Sensations evoked by thermal stimulation (temperature-related sensations) can be divided into two categories, "temperature sensation" and "thermal comfort." Although several studies have investigated regional differences in temperature sensation, less is known about the sensitivity differences in thermal comfort for the various body regions. In the present study, we examined regional differences in temperature-related sensations with special attention to thermal comfort. Healthy male subjects sitting in an environment of mild heat or cold were locally cooled or warmed with water-perfused stimulators. Areas stimulated were the face, chest, abdomen, and thigh. Temperature sensation and thermal comfort of the stimulated areas were reported by the subjects, as was whole body thermal comfort. During mild heat exposure, facial cooling was most comfortable and facial warming was most uncomfortable. On the other hand, during mild cold exposure, neither warming nor cooling of the face had a major effect. The chest and abdomen had characteristics opposite to those of the face. Local warming of the chest and abdomen did produce a strong comfort sensation during whole body cold exposure. The thermal comfort seen in this study suggests that if given the chance, humans would preferentially cool the head in the heat, and they would maintain the warmth of the trunk areas in the cold. The qualitative differences seen in thermal comfort for the various areas cannot be explained solely by the density or properties of the peripheral thermal receptors and thus must reflect processing mechanisms in the central nervous system.

AB - Sensations evoked by thermal stimulation (temperature-related sensations) can be divided into two categories, "temperature sensation" and "thermal comfort." Although several studies have investigated regional differences in temperature sensation, less is known about the sensitivity differences in thermal comfort for the various body regions. In the present study, we examined regional differences in temperature-related sensations with special attention to thermal comfort. Healthy male subjects sitting in an environment of mild heat or cold were locally cooled or warmed with water-perfused stimulators. Areas stimulated were the face, chest, abdomen, and thigh. Temperature sensation and thermal comfort of the stimulated areas were reported by the subjects, as was whole body thermal comfort. During mild heat exposure, facial cooling was most comfortable and facial warming was most uncomfortable. On the other hand, during mild cold exposure, neither warming nor cooling of the face had a major effect. The chest and abdomen had characteristics opposite to those of the face. Local warming of the chest and abdomen did produce a strong comfort sensation during whole body cold exposure. The thermal comfort seen in this study suggests that if given the chance, humans would preferentially cool the head in the heat, and they would maintain the warmth of the trunk areas in the cold. The qualitative differences seen in thermal comfort for the various areas cannot be explained solely by the density or properties of the peripheral thermal receptors and thus must reflect processing mechanisms in the central nervous system.

KW - Cold exposure

KW - Heat exposure

KW - Skin temperature

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57349194646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57349194646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.90466.2008

DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.90466.2008

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 1897

EP - 1906

JO - Journal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental and Exercise Physiology

JF - Journal of Applied Physiology Respiratory Environmental and Exercise Physiology

SN - 8750-7587

IS - 6

ER -