Roles of extension and ethno-religious networks in acceptance of resource-conserving agriculture among Ethiopian farmers

Petr Matouš, Yasuyuki Todo, Dagne Mojo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses roles of social and extension networks in adoption of resource-conserving practices among Ethiopian farmers. We gathered data from 297 randomly sampled households on their agricultural practices, social networks, access to the extension, and geographical location. After examining general determinants of practising resource-conserving agriculture, we employ a two-stage regression with full-maximum likelihood correction for selection bias to establish the roles of general social networks and external professionals in acceptance of conservation techniques. In accordance with previous research, probit regression in the first stage shows that the access to extension increases with farmers' wealth and the size of their personal networks, and decreases with the distance of their households from village centres. However, after accounting for this unequal access to extension, the second-stage linear regression shows that regardless of education, wealth or geographical location, those whose religion and ethnicity match with their agent, report learning more about conservation from extension sources. Furthermore, farmers who are socially well connected within the community tend to be less receptive to agents' recommendations regarding resource conservation. Dissemination policy of conservation agriculture should consider the ethnic and religious affinity between farmers and their extension agents. It also needs to pay more attention to socially and geographically isolated individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-316
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Nov
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

farmers
agriculture
social networks
Geographical Locations
households
extension agents
religion
nationalities and ethnic groups
villages
education
learning
Acceptance
Agriculture
Farmers
Resources
Conservation
methodology
Wealth
Social networks
Household

Keywords

  • Ethiopia
  • extension systems
  • resource-conserving agriculture
  • social networks
  • technology adoption

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{499c7dde3e994ab28d20789c7c052f58,
title = "Roles of extension and ethno-religious networks in acceptance of resource-conserving agriculture among Ethiopian farmers",
abstract = "This article analyses roles of social and extension networks in adoption of resource-conserving practices among Ethiopian farmers. We gathered data from 297 randomly sampled households on their agricultural practices, social networks, access to the extension, and geographical location. After examining general determinants of practising resource-conserving agriculture, we employ a two-stage regression with full-maximum likelihood correction for selection bias to establish the roles of general social networks and external professionals in acceptance of conservation techniques. In accordance with previous research, probit regression in the first stage shows that the access to extension increases with farmers' wealth and the size of their personal networks, and decreases with the distance of their households from village centres. However, after accounting for this unequal access to extension, the second-stage linear regression shows that regardless of education, wealth or geographical location, those whose religion and ethnicity match with their agent, report learning more about conservation from extension sources. Furthermore, farmers who are socially well connected within the community tend to be less receptive to agents' recommendations regarding resource conservation. Dissemination policy of conservation agriculture should consider the ethnic and religious affinity between farmers and their extension agents. It also needs to pay more attention to socially and geographically isolated individuals.",
keywords = "Ethiopia, extension systems, resource-conserving agriculture, social networks, technology adoption",
author = "Petr Matouš and Yasuyuki Todo and Dagne Mojo",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/14735903.2012.751701",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "301--316",
journal = "International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability",
issn = "1473-5903",
publisher = "Earthscan",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Roles of extension and ethno-religious networks in acceptance of resource-conserving agriculture among Ethiopian farmers

AU - Matouš, Petr

AU - Todo, Yasuyuki

AU - Mojo, Dagne

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - This article analyses roles of social and extension networks in adoption of resource-conserving practices among Ethiopian farmers. We gathered data from 297 randomly sampled households on their agricultural practices, social networks, access to the extension, and geographical location. After examining general determinants of practising resource-conserving agriculture, we employ a two-stage regression with full-maximum likelihood correction for selection bias to establish the roles of general social networks and external professionals in acceptance of conservation techniques. In accordance with previous research, probit regression in the first stage shows that the access to extension increases with farmers' wealth and the size of their personal networks, and decreases with the distance of their households from village centres. However, after accounting for this unequal access to extension, the second-stage linear regression shows that regardless of education, wealth or geographical location, those whose religion and ethnicity match with their agent, report learning more about conservation from extension sources. Furthermore, farmers who are socially well connected within the community tend to be less receptive to agents' recommendations regarding resource conservation. Dissemination policy of conservation agriculture should consider the ethnic and religious affinity between farmers and their extension agents. It also needs to pay more attention to socially and geographically isolated individuals.

AB - This article analyses roles of social and extension networks in adoption of resource-conserving practices among Ethiopian farmers. We gathered data from 297 randomly sampled households on their agricultural practices, social networks, access to the extension, and geographical location. After examining general determinants of practising resource-conserving agriculture, we employ a two-stage regression with full-maximum likelihood correction for selection bias to establish the roles of general social networks and external professionals in acceptance of conservation techniques. In accordance with previous research, probit regression in the first stage shows that the access to extension increases with farmers' wealth and the size of their personal networks, and decreases with the distance of their households from village centres. However, after accounting for this unequal access to extension, the second-stage linear regression shows that regardless of education, wealth or geographical location, those whose religion and ethnicity match with their agent, report learning more about conservation from extension sources. Furthermore, farmers who are socially well connected within the community tend to be less receptive to agents' recommendations regarding resource conservation. Dissemination policy of conservation agriculture should consider the ethnic and religious affinity between farmers and their extension agents. It also needs to pay more attention to socially and geographically isolated individuals.

KW - Ethiopia

KW - extension systems

KW - resource-conserving agriculture

KW - social networks

KW - technology adoption

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886086141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886086141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14735903.2012.751701

DO - 10.1080/14735903.2012.751701

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 301

EP - 316

JO - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

JF - International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

SN - 1473-5903

IS - 4

ER -