Russia's energy governance transitions and implications for enhanced cooperation with China, Japan, and South Korea

Elena Shadrina, Michael Bradshaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A Tokyo-based economist and a noted western economic geographer, both specializing in the hydrocarbon resources of Russia, apply the framework of governance studies in an effort to gain a deeper understanding of the recent changes in the country's energy policy-making. The authors argue that, unlike the international relations paradigm prevailing in studies of Russia's energy policy, the country's multiple roles in the international energy arena (as producer, consumer, exporter, importer, and transit state) warrant a more nuanced approach, reflecting Russian energy policy's flexibility over time and diversity across space. This paper endeavors, therefore, to apply a political economy and governance perspective to an understanding of the significant changes in Russia's energy policy-making regarding its dynamic energy relations with the Northeast Asia (NEA; China, Japan, and South Korea). In exploring the complex interactions between Russia's internal energy policy-making and its emerging energy relations in NEA, the authors addresses three key questions, namely: (1) how Russia's Asian energy policy corresponds to its domestic needs, (2) how much coherence in energy governance and cooperation exists between Russia and the Northeast Asian states at the institutional and organizational levels, and (3) the extent to which Russia's expectations for increased energy cooperation with the Northeast Asian states are likely to materialize.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-499
Number of pages39
JournalPost-Soviet Affairs
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Nov 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

energy policy
South Korea
Russia
Japan
governance
energy
China
political governance
Governance
Energy
economist
international relations
Energy policy
political economy
producer
flexibility
paradigm
interaction
resources
economics

Keywords

  • China
  • Energy governance
  • Energy policy transition
  • Gazprom
  • Japan
  • Northeast Asia
  • Oil and gas exports
  • Political economy
  • Pricing disputes
  • Rosneft
  • Russia
  • South Korea
  • Transneft

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Russia's energy governance transitions and implications for enhanced cooperation with China, Japan, and South Korea. / Shadrina, Elena; Bradshaw, Michael.

In: Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 29, No. 6, 01.11.2013, p. 461-499.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13eaa96a64a44d719ef01911c2e37bde,
title = "Russia's energy governance transitions and implications for enhanced cooperation with China, Japan, and South Korea",
abstract = "A Tokyo-based economist and a noted western economic geographer, both specializing in the hydrocarbon resources of Russia, apply the framework of governance studies in an effort to gain a deeper understanding of the recent changes in the country's energy policy-making. The authors argue that, unlike the international relations paradigm prevailing in studies of Russia's energy policy, the country's multiple roles in the international energy arena (as producer, consumer, exporter, importer, and transit state) warrant a more nuanced approach, reflecting Russian energy policy's flexibility over time and diversity across space. This paper endeavors, therefore, to apply a political economy and governance perspective to an understanding of the significant changes in Russia's energy policy-making regarding its dynamic energy relations with the Northeast Asia (NEA; China, Japan, and South Korea). In exploring the complex interactions between Russia's internal energy policy-making and its emerging energy relations in NEA, the authors addresses three key questions, namely: (1) how Russia's Asian energy policy corresponds to its domestic needs, (2) how much coherence in energy governance and cooperation exists between Russia and the Northeast Asian states at the institutional and organizational levels, and (3) the extent to which Russia's expectations for increased energy cooperation with the Northeast Asian states are likely to materialize.",
keywords = "China, Energy governance, Energy policy transition, Gazprom, Japan, Northeast Asia, Oil and gas exports, Political economy, Pricing disputes, Rosneft, Russia, South Korea, Transneft",
author = "Elena Shadrina and Michael Bradshaw",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1060586X.2013.837635",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "461--499",
journal = "Post-Soviet Affairs",
issn = "1060-586X",
publisher = "Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Russia's energy governance transitions and implications for enhanced cooperation with China, Japan, and South Korea

AU - Shadrina, Elena

AU - Bradshaw, Michael

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - A Tokyo-based economist and a noted western economic geographer, both specializing in the hydrocarbon resources of Russia, apply the framework of governance studies in an effort to gain a deeper understanding of the recent changes in the country's energy policy-making. The authors argue that, unlike the international relations paradigm prevailing in studies of Russia's energy policy, the country's multiple roles in the international energy arena (as producer, consumer, exporter, importer, and transit state) warrant a more nuanced approach, reflecting Russian energy policy's flexibility over time and diversity across space. This paper endeavors, therefore, to apply a political economy and governance perspective to an understanding of the significant changes in Russia's energy policy-making regarding its dynamic energy relations with the Northeast Asia (NEA; China, Japan, and South Korea). In exploring the complex interactions between Russia's internal energy policy-making and its emerging energy relations in NEA, the authors addresses three key questions, namely: (1) how Russia's Asian energy policy corresponds to its domestic needs, (2) how much coherence in energy governance and cooperation exists between Russia and the Northeast Asian states at the institutional and organizational levels, and (3) the extent to which Russia's expectations for increased energy cooperation with the Northeast Asian states are likely to materialize.

AB - A Tokyo-based economist and a noted western economic geographer, both specializing in the hydrocarbon resources of Russia, apply the framework of governance studies in an effort to gain a deeper understanding of the recent changes in the country's energy policy-making. The authors argue that, unlike the international relations paradigm prevailing in studies of Russia's energy policy, the country's multiple roles in the international energy arena (as producer, consumer, exporter, importer, and transit state) warrant a more nuanced approach, reflecting Russian energy policy's flexibility over time and diversity across space. This paper endeavors, therefore, to apply a political economy and governance perspective to an understanding of the significant changes in Russia's energy policy-making regarding its dynamic energy relations with the Northeast Asia (NEA; China, Japan, and South Korea). In exploring the complex interactions between Russia's internal energy policy-making and its emerging energy relations in NEA, the authors addresses three key questions, namely: (1) how Russia's Asian energy policy corresponds to its domestic needs, (2) how much coherence in energy governance and cooperation exists between Russia and the Northeast Asian states at the institutional and organizational levels, and (3) the extent to which Russia's expectations for increased energy cooperation with the Northeast Asian states are likely to materialize.

KW - China

KW - Energy governance

KW - Energy policy transition

KW - Gazprom

KW - Japan

KW - Northeast Asia

KW - Oil and gas exports

KW - Political economy

KW - Pricing disputes

KW - Rosneft

KW - Russia

KW - South Korea

KW - Transneft

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889883339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889883339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1060586X.2013.837635

DO - 10.1080/1060586X.2013.837635

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84889883339

VL - 29

SP - 461

EP - 499

JO - Post-Soviet Affairs

JF - Post-Soviet Affairs

SN - 1060-586X

IS - 6

ER -