Sequential effects in face-attractiveness judgment

Aki Kondo, Kohske Takahashi, Katsumi Watanabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that current-trial responses are biased toward the response of the preceding trial in perceptual decisionmaking tasks (the sequential effectöHolland and Lockhead, 1968 Perception & Psychophysics 3 409-414). The sequential effect has been widely observed in evaluation of the physical properties of stimuli as well as more complex properties. However, it is unclear whether subjective decisions (eg attractiveness judgments) are also susceptible to the sequential effect. Here, we examined whether the sequential effect would occur in face-attractiveness judgments. Forty-eight pictures of male and female faces were presented successively. Participants rated the attractiveness of each face on a 7-point scale. The results showed that the attractiveness rating of a given face assimilated toward the rating of the preceding trial. In a separate experiment, we provided the average attractiveness rating by others for each trial as feedback. The feedback weakened the sequential effect. These findings suggest that attractiveness judgment is also biased toward the preceding judgment, and hence the sequential effect can be extended into the domain of subjective decisionmaking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-49
Number of pages7
JournalPerception
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Feedback
Physical properties
Psychophysics
Experiments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Sequential effects in face-attractiveness judgment. / Kondo, Aki; Takahashi, Kohske; Watanabe, Katsumi.

In: Perception, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2012, p. 43-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kondo, Aki ; Takahashi, Kohske ; Watanabe, Katsumi. / Sequential effects in face-attractiveness judgment. In: Perception. 2012 ; Vol. 41, No. 1. pp. 43-49.
@article{f3fd63d4251e44e09424e24b408d24d2,
title = "Sequential effects in face-attractiveness judgment",
abstract = "A number of studies have shown that current-trial responses are biased toward the response of the preceding trial in perceptual decisionmaking tasks (the sequential effect{\"o}Holland and Lockhead, 1968 Perception & Psychophysics 3 409-414). The sequential effect has been widely observed in evaluation of the physical properties of stimuli as well as more complex properties. However, it is unclear whether subjective decisions (eg attractiveness judgments) are also susceptible to the sequential effect. Here, we examined whether the sequential effect would occur in face-attractiveness judgments. Forty-eight pictures of male and female faces were presented successively. Participants rated the attractiveness of each face on a 7-point scale. The results showed that the attractiveness rating of a given face assimilated toward the rating of the preceding trial. In a separate experiment, we provided the average attractiveness rating by others for each trial as feedback. The feedback weakened the sequential effect. These findings suggest that attractiveness judgment is also biased toward the preceding judgment, and hence the sequential effect can be extended into the domain of subjective decisionmaking.",
author = "Aki Kondo and Kohske Takahashi and Katsumi Watanabe",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1068/p7116",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "43--49",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequential effects in face-attractiveness judgment

AU - Kondo, Aki

AU - Takahashi, Kohske

AU - Watanabe, Katsumi

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A number of studies have shown that current-trial responses are biased toward the response of the preceding trial in perceptual decisionmaking tasks (the sequential effectöHolland and Lockhead, 1968 Perception & Psychophysics 3 409-414). The sequential effect has been widely observed in evaluation of the physical properties of stimuli as well as more complex properties. However, it is unclear whether subjective decisions (eg attractiveness judgments) are also susceptible to the sequential effect. Here, we examined whether the sequential effect would occur in face-attractiveness judgments. Forty-eight pictures of male and female faces were presented successively. Participants rated the attractiveness of each face on a 7-point scale. The results showed that the attractiveness rating of a given face assimilated toward the rating of the preceding trial. In a separate experiment, we provided the average attractiveness rating by others for each trial as feedback. The feedback weakened the sequential effect. These findings suggest that attractiveness judgment is also biased toward the preceding judgment, and hence the sequential effect can be extended into the domain of subjective decisionmaking.

AB - A number of studies have shown that current-trial responses are biased toward the response of the preceding trial in perceptual decisionmaking tasks (the sequential effectöHolland and Lockhead, 1968 Perception & Psychophysics 3 409-414). The sequential effect has been widely observed in evaluation of the physical properties of stimuli as well as more complex properties. However, it is unclear whether subjective decisions (eg attractiveness judgments) are also susceptible to the sequential effect. Here, we examined whether the sequential effect would occur in face-attractiveness judgments. Forty-eight pictures of male and female faces were presented successively. Participants rated the attractiveness of each face on a 7-point scale. The results showed that the attractiveness rating of a given face assimilated toward the rating of the preceding trial. In a separate experiment, we provided the average attractiveness rating by others for each trial as feedback. The feedback weakened the sequential effect. These findings suggest that attractiveness judgment is also biased toward the preceding judgment, and hence the sequential effect can be extended into the domain of subjective decisionmaking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863275008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863275008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/p7116

DO - 10.1068/p7116

M3 - Article

C2 - 22611662

AN - SCOPUS:84863275008

VL - 41

SP - 43

EP - 49

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 1

ER -