Should we track migrant households when collecting household panel data? Household relocation, economic mobility, and attrition biases in the rural Philippines

Nobuhiko Fuwa

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Based on household panel data that tracked migrant households (with an additional survey cost of 17 percent), this article describes behavior of household relocation and quantifies the extent of attrition biases in estimating the determinants of percapita household consumption and of its growth rate. Many households relocate for non-economic reasons, and to rural destinations, while the small number of urban migrants improved their wellbeing faster than did others. Such heterogeneity among migrants may be a reason behind the negligible attrition biases caused by the omission of migrants, in the inference on the average behavioral coefficients among the original population.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)56-82
    Number of pages27
    JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
    Volume93
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011 Jan

    Fingerprint

    family resource management
    Philippines
    households
    Economics
    Costs and Cost Analysis
    Panel data
    Migrants
    Household
    Relocation
    Attrition
    Growth
    Population

    Keywords

    • domestic migration
    • household relocation
    • panel data analysis
    • Philippines
    • poverty dynamics
    • sample attrition
    • urbanization

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    @article{7b533198bac44e3d9880a19d2e5db424,
    title = "Should we track migrant households when collecting household panel data? Household relocation, economic mobility, and attrition biases in the rural Philippines",
    abstract = "Based on household panel data that tracked migrant households (with an additional survey cost of 17 percent), this article describes behavior of household relocation and quantifies the extent of attrition biases in estimating the determinants of percapita household consumption and of its growth rate. Many households relocate for non-economic reasons, and to rural destinations, while the small number of urban migrants improved their wellbeing faster than did others. Such heterogeneity among migrants may be a reason behind the negligible attrition biases caused by the omission of migrants, in the inference on the average behavioral coefficients among the original population.",
    keywords = "domestic migration, household relocation, panel data analysis, Philippines, poverty dynamics, sample attrition, urbanization",
    author = "Nobuhiko Fuwa",
    year = "2011",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/ajae/aaq114",
    language = "English",
    volume = "93",
    pages = "56--82",
    journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",
    issn = "0002-9092",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Should we track migrant households when collecting household panel data? Household relocation, economic mobility, and attrition biases in the rural Philippines

    AU - Fuwa, Nobuhiko

    PY - 2011/1

    Y1 - 2011/1

    N2 - Based on household panel data that tracked migrant households (with an additional survey cost of 17 percent), this article describes behavior of household relocation and quantifies the extent of attrition biases in estimating the determinants of percapita household consumption and of its growth rate. Many households relocate for non-economic reasons, and to rural destinations, while the small number of urban migrants improved their wellbeing faster than did others. Such heterogeneity among migrants may be a reason behind the negligible attrition biases caused by the omission of migrants, in the inference on the average behavioral coefficients among the original population.

    AB - Based on household panel data that tracked migrant households (with an additional survey cost of 17 percent), this article describes behavior of household relocation and quantifies the extent of attrition biases in estimating the determinants of percapita household consumption and of its growth rate. Many households relocate for non-economic reasons, and to rural destinations, while the small number of urban migrants improved their wellbeing faster than did others. Such heterogeneity among migrants may be a reason behind the negligible attrition biases caused by the omission of migrants, in the inference on the average behavioral coefficients among the original population.

    KW - domestic migration

    KW - household relocation

    KW - panel data analysis

    KW - Philippines

    KW - poverty dynamics

    KW - sample attrition

    KW - urbanization

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952954615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952954615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/ajae/aaq114

    DO - 10.1093/ajae/aaq114

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:79952954615

    VL - 93

    SP - 56

    EP - 82

    JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

    JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

    SN - 0002-9092

    IS - 1

    ER -