Silencing Critics

Why and How Presidents Restrict Media Freedom in Democracies

Marisa Andrea Kellam, Elizabeth A. Stein

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The media hold democratically elected leaders accountable by exposing corruption and policy failures. Although many politicians accept media criticism as intrinsic to liberal democracy, some politicians rein in freedom of the press or intimidate media outlets to silence their critics. We identify circumstances that motivate and enable presidents to curb media freedom in presidential democracies. We argue that (a) presidents who hold ideological positions contrary to those of the mainstream media adopt the media as viable opponents in the absence of an effective electoral opposition, and (b) the media are vulnerable to presidential infringements on their freedom where legislatures and judiciaries hold weak powers relative to presidents, and are therefore unable to constrain presidents’ actions against media freedom. We support our argument with quantitative analyses of press freedom ratings in presidential and semi-presidential democracies from 1993 to 2013.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)36-77
    Number of pages42
    JournalComparative Political Studies
    Volume49
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

    Fingerprint

    critic
    president
    democracy
    politician
    media criticism
    freedom of the press
    corruption
    opposition
    rating
    leader

    Keywords

    • Latin American politics
    • media freedom
    • presidents and executive politics
    • quality of democracy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Silencing Critics : Why and How Presidents Restrict Media Freedom in Democracies. / Kellam, Marisa Andrea; Stein, Elizabeth A.

    In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 36-77.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e1c0627b4bb041148196ceeaa61fa50f,
    title = "Silencing Critics: Why and How Presidents Restrict Media Freedom in Democracies",
    abstract = "The media hold democratically elected leaders accountable by exposing corruption and policy failures. Although many politicians accept media criticism as intrinsic to liberal democracy, some politicians rein in freedom of the press or intimidate media outlets to silence their critics. We identify circumstances that motivate and enable presidents to curb media freedom in presidential democracies. We argue that (a) presidents who hold ideological positions contrary to those of the mainstream media adopt the media as viable opponents in the absence of an effective electoral opposition, and (b) the media are vulnerable to presidential infringements on their freedom where legislatures and judiciaries hold weak powers relative to presidents, and are therefore unable to constrain presidents’ actions against media freedom. We support our argument with quantitative analyses of press freedom ratings in presidential and semi-presidential democracies from 1993 to 2013.",
    keywords = "Latin American politics, media freedom, presidents and executive politics, quality of democracy",
    author = "Kellam, {Marisa Andrea} and Stein, {Elizabeth A.}",
    year = "2016",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0010414015592644",
    language = "English",
    volume = "49",
    pages = "36--77",
    journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
    issn = "0010-4140",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Silencing Critics

    T2 - Why and How Presidents Restrict Media Freedom in Democracies

    AU - Kellam, Marisa Andrea

    AU - Stein, Elizabeth A.

    PY - 2016/1/1

    Y1 - 2016/1/1

    N2 - The media hold democratically elected leaders accountable by exposing corruption and policy failures. Although many politicians accept media criticism as intrinsic to liberal democracy, some politicians rein in freedom of the press or intimidate media outlets to silence their critics. We identify circumstances that motivate and enable presidents to curb media freedom in presidential democracies. We argue that (a) presidents who hold ideological positions contrary to those of the mainstream media adopt the media as viable opponents in the absence of an effective electoral opposition, and (b) the media are vulnerable to presidential infringements on their freedom where legislatures and judiciaries hold weak powers relative to presidents, and are therefore unable to constrain presidents’ actions against media freedom. We support our argument with quantitative analyses of press freedom ratings in presidential and semi-presidential democracies from 1993 to 2013.

    AB - The media hold democratically elected leaders accountable by exposing corruption and policy failures. Although many politicians accept media criticism as intrinsic to liberal democracy, some politicians rein in freedom of the press or intimidate media outlets to silence their critics. We identify circumstances that motivate and enable presidents to curb media freedom in presidential democracies. We argue that (a) presidents who hold ideological positions contrary to those of the mainstream media adopt the media as viable opponents in the absence of an effective electoral opposition, and (b) the media are vulnerable to presidential infringements on their freedom where legislatures and judiciaries hold weak powers relative to presidents, and are therefore unable to constrain presidents’ actions against media freedom. We support our argument with quantitative analyses of press freedom ratings in presidential and semi-presidential democracies from 1993 to 2013.

    KW - Latin American politics

    KW - media freedom

    KW - presidents and executive politics

    KW - quality of democracy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949684282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949684282&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0010414015592644

    DO - 10.1177/0010414015592644

    M3 - Article

    VL - 49

    SP - 36

    EP - 77

    JO - Comparative Political Studies

    JF - Comparative Political Studies

    SN - 0010-4140

    IS - 1

    ER -