Somatosensory off-response in humans: An ERP study

Koya Yamashiro, Koji Inui, Naofumi Otsuru, Tetsuo Kida, Kosuke Akatsuka, Ryusuke Kakigi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quick detection of changes in the sensory environment is very important for survival, resulting in automatic shifts of attention to the event and the facilitation of subsequent processes to execute appropriate behaviors. The abrupt onset or offset of a sensory stimulus should also activate the neural network detecting changes. To test this hypothesis, we compared cortical on- and off-responses using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by a train of electrical pulses delivered to the right hand in eight healthy volunteers. SEPs were recorded from 15 electrodes on the scalp at three different interstimulus intervals (ISIs, 50, 20, and 10 ms) under two sets of conditions (attended and unattended). Both the onset and offset of stimulation evoked two similar components, P100 and N140, in the attended and unattended conditions. The latency of P100 and N140 in response to stimulus onset did not differ among the three ISIs, while the latency of both components in response to stimulus offset was significantly longer for the longer ISI; that is, detection of the cessation of the stimulation was based on short-term memory of the stimulus frequency. The present results supported a cortical network triggered by both the onset and offset of sensory stimulation. In this network, the change is automatically detected using a memory trace by comparing the abrupt event (on or off) with the preceding condition (silent or repetitive stimuli).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-213
Number of pages7
JournalExperimental Brain Research
Volume190
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Sep

Fingerprint

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Scalp
Short-Term Memory
Healthy Volunteers
Electrodes
Hand
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Yamashiro, K., Inui, K., Otsuru, N., Kida, T., Akatsuka, K., & Kakigi, R. (2008). Somatosensory off-response in humans: An ERP study. Experimental Brain Research, 190(2), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1468-8

Somatosensory off-response in humans : An ERP study. / Yamashiro, Koya; Inui, Koji; Otsuru, Naofumi; Kida, Tetsuo; Akatsuka, Kosuke; Kakigi, Ryusuke.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 190, No. 2, 09.2008, p. 207-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yamashiro, K, Inui, K, Otsuru, N, Kida, T, Akatsuka, K & Kakigi, R 2008, 'Somatosensory off-response in humans: An ERP study', Experimental Brain Research, vol. 190, no. 2, pp. 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1468-8
Yamashiro K, Inui K, Otsuru N, Kida T, Akatsuka K, Kakigi R. Somatosensory off-response in humans: An ERP study. Experimental Brain Research. 2008 Sep;190(2):207-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1468-8
Yamashiro, Koya ; Inui, Koji ; Otsuru, Naofumi ; Kida, Tetsuo ; Akatsuka, Kosuke ; Kakigi, Ryusuke. / Somatosensory off-response in humans : An ERP study. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2008 ; Vol. 190, No. 2. pp. 207-213.
@article{f4a09abe64fb45008b7b872b173049e3,
title = "Somatosensory off-response in humans: An ERP study",
abstract = "Quick detection of changes in the sensory environment is very important for survival, resulting in automatic shifts of attention to the event and the facilitation of subsequent processes to execute appropriate behaviors. The abrupt onset or offset of a sensory stimulus should also activate the neural network detecting changes. To test this hypothesis, we compared cortical on- and off-responses using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by a train of electrical pulses delivered to the right hand in eight healthy volunteers. SEPs were recorded from 15 electrodes on the scalp at three different interstimulus intervals (ISIs, 50, 20, and 10 ms) under two sets of conditions (attended and unattended). Both the onset and offset of stimulation evoked two similar components, P100 and N140, in the attended and unattended conditions. The latency of P100 and N140 in response to stimulus onset did not differ among the three ISIs, while the latency of both components in response to stimulus offset was significantly longer for the longer ISI; that is, detection of the cessation of the stimulation was based on short-term memory of the stimulus frequency. The present results supported a cortical network triggered by both the onset and offset of sensory stimulation. In this network, the change is automatically detected using a memory trace by comparing the abrupt event (on or off) with the preceding condition (silent or repetitive stimuli).",
author = "Koya Yamashiro and Koji Inui and Naofumi Otsuru and Tetsuo Kida and Kosuke Akatsuka and Ryusuke Kakigi",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-008-1468-8",
language = "English",
volume = "190",
pages = "207--213",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Somatosensory off-response in humans

T2 - An ERP study

AU - Yamashiro, Koya

AU - Inui, Koji

AU - Otsuru, Naofumi

AU - Kida, Tetsuo

AU - Akatsuka, Kosuke

AU - Kakigi, Ryusuke

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Quick detection of changes in the sensory environment is very important for survival, resulting in automatic shifts of attention to the event and the facilitation of subsequent processes to execute appropriate behaviors. The abrupt onset or offset of a sensory stimulus should also activate the neural network detecting changes. To test this hypothesis, we compared cortical on- and off-responses using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by a train of electrical pulses delivered to the right hand in eight healthy volunteers. SEPs were recorded from 15 electrodes on the scalp at three different interstimulus intervals (ISIs, 50, 20, and 10 ms) under two sets of conditions (attended and unattended). Both the onset and offset of stimulation evoked two similar components, P100 and N140, in the attended and unattended conditions. The latency of P100 and N140 in response to stimulus onset did not differ among the three ISIs, while the latency of both components in response to stimulus offset was significantly longer for the longer ISI; that is, detection of the cessation of the stimulation was based on short-term memory of the stimulus frequency. The present results supported a cortical network triggered by both the onset and offset of sensory stimulation. In this network, the change is automatically detected using a memory trace by comparing the abrupt event (on or off) with the preceding condition (silent or repetitive stimuli).

AB - Quick detection of changes in the sensory environment is very important for survival, resulting in automatic shifts of attention to the event and the facilitation of subsequent processes to execute appropriate behaviors. The abrupt onset or offset of a sensory stimulus should also activate the neural network detecting changes. To test this hypothesis, we compared cortical on- and off-responses using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by a train of electrical pulses delivered to the right hand in eight healthy volunteers. SEPs were recorded from 15 electrodes on the scalp at three different interstimulus intervals (ISIs, 50, 20, and 10 ms) under two sets of conditions (attended and unattended). Both the onset and offset of stimulation evoked two similar components, P100 and N140, in the attended and unattended conditions. The latency of P100 and N140 in response to stimulus onset did not differ among the three ISIs, while the latency of both components in response to stimulus offset was significantly longer for the longer ISI; that is, detection of the cessation of the stimulation was based on short-term memory of the stimulus frequency. The present results supported a cortical network triggered by both the onset and offset of sensory stimulation. In this network, the change is automatically detected using a memory trace by comparing the abrupt event (on or off) with the preceding condition (silent or repetitive stimuli).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49649085736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49649085736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-008-1468-8

DO - 10.1007/s00221-008-1468-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 18584160

AN - SCOPUS:49649085736

VL - 190

SP - 207

EP - 213

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 2

ER -