Spurred by Threats or Afraid of War? A Survey Experiment on Costs of Conflict in Support for Military Action

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, Atsushi Tago, Seiki Tanaka

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    It is commonly assumed that perceived threats from a rival state will make individuals more likely to "rally-round-the-flag" and support military action. Previous studies have looked at how information about threats affects public support for military action. To date, however, there has been less attention to how information about the costs of conflict affects support for military action in response to threats. In this article, we present a survey experiment designed to evaluate how information about the likely military and economic costs of conflict influences support for military action. We provide Japanese respondents with information about relations with China, and probe how support for military action in the context of the ongoing territorial dispute changes with varying information on the military costs of conflict and its economic consequences. We find that information about trade ties and military capacity exerts a pacifying effect and strengthens opposition to military action. Consistent with our proposed mechanism, we show that greater awareness of military costs is associated with stronger opposition to military action. Our results indicate that even under the existence of external threats, greater awareness of the costs of conflict affects attitudes to military action and can increase support for peaceful solutions to territorial rivalries.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalPeace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jan 1

    Fingerprint

    Military
    threat
    experiment
    costs
    cost
    territorial dispute
    economics
    conflict
    Threat
    Experiment
    Costs
    opposition
    probe
    public support
    China

    Keywords

    • arming
    • China
    • interdependence
    • Japan
    • public opinion
    • territorial disputes

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Political Science and International Relations
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

    Cite this

    Spurred by Threats or Afraid of War? A Survey Experiment on Costs of Conflict in Support for Military Action. / Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede; Tago, Atsushi; Tanaka, Seiki.

    In: Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 01.01.2019.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d7b93a99855649ec9592d72cbc3ce818,
    title = "Spurred by Threats or Afraid of War? A Survey Experiment on Costs of Conflict in Support for Military Action",
    abstract = "It is commonly assumed that perceived threats from a rival state will make individuals more likely to {"}rally-round-the-flag{"} and support military action. Previous studies have looked at how information about threats affects public support for military action. To date, however, there has been less attention to how information about the costs of conflict affects support for military action in response to threats. In this article, we present a survey experiment designed to evaluate how information about the likely military and economic costs of conflict influences support for military action. We provide Japanese respondents with information about relations with China, and probe how support for military action in the context of the ongoing territorial dispute changes with varying information on the military costs of conflict and its economic consequences. We find that information about trade ties and military capacity exerts a pacifying effect and strengthens opposition to military action. Consistent with our proposed mechanism, we show that greater awareness of military costs is associated with stronger opposition to military action. Our results indicate that even under the existence of external threats, greater awareness of the costs of conflict affects attitudes to military action and can increase support for peaceful solutions to territorial rivalries.",
    keywords = "arming, China, interdependence, Japan, public opinion, territorial disputes",
    author = "Gleditsch, {Kristian Skrede} and Atsushi Tago and Seiki Tanaka",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1515/peps-2018-0023",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy",
    issn = "1079-2457",
    publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Spurred by Threats or Afraid of War? A Survey Experiment on Costs of Conflict in Support for Military Action

    AU - Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede

    AU - Tago, Atsushi

    AU - Tanaka, Seiki

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - It is commonly assumed that perceived threats from a rival state will make individuals more likely to "rally-round-the-flag" and support military action. Previous studies have looked at how information about threats affects public support for military action. To date, however, there has been less attention to how information about the costs of conflict affects support for military action in response to threats. In this article, we present a survey experiment designed to evaluate how information about the likely military and economic costs of conflict influences support for military action. We provide Japanese respondents with information about relations with China, and probe how support for military action in the context of the ongoing territorial dispute changes with varying information on the military costs of conflict and its economic consequences. We find that information about trade ties and military capacity exerts a pacifying effect and strengthens opposition to military action. Consistent with our proposed mechanism, we show that greater awareness of military costs is associated with stronger opposition to military action. Our results indicate that even under the existence of external threats, greater awareness of the costs of conflict affects attitudes to military action and can increase support for peaceful solutions to territorial rivalries.

    AB - It is commonly assumed that perceived threats from a rival state will make individuals more likely to "rally-round-the-flag" and support military action. Previous studies have looked at how information about threats affects public support for military action. To date, however, there has been less attention to how information about the costs of conflict affects support for military action in response to threats. In this article, we present a survey experiment designed to evaluate how information about the likely military and economic costs of conflict influences support for military action. We provide Japanese respondents with information about relations with China, and probe how support for military action in the context of the ongoing territorial dispute changes with varying information on the military costs of conflict and its economic consequences. We find that information about trade ties and military capacity exerts a pacifying effect and strengthens opposition to military action. Consistent with our proposed mechanism, we show that greater awareness of military costs is associated with stronger opposition to military action. Our results indicate that even under the existence of external threats, greater awareness of the costs of conflict affects attitudes to military action and can increase support for peaceful solutions to territorial rivalries.

    KW - arming

    KW - China

    KW - interdependence

    KW - Japan

    KW - public opinion

    KW - territorial disputes

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063075283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063075283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1515/peps-2018-0023

    DO - 10.1515/peps-2018-0023

    M3 - Article

    JO - Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

    JF - Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy

    SN - 1079-2457

    ER -