Study of anatomical landmark sampling error effect on motion measurement reproducibility for orthopaedic physical examination assisting system

Jun Okamoto, Yu Kumasaka, Kazuya Kawamura, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Seiji Kubo, Hirotsugu Muratsu, Masahiro Kurosaka, Masakatsu G. Fujie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We have been developing the Orthopaedic physical examination assisting system using magnetic position tracker to quantitate knee laxity diagnosis. In this study, to investigate the influence of anatomical landmark sampling error for bone coordinate registration, reproducibility verification simulation was done. Firstly, the motion data of imitation bones was acquired using the system and set as a reference data. To get the error motion data, virtual error vectors were added on the reference sampling points and new motion data was recomputed. Evaluation was executed by comparison with the reference data and recomputed data. The evaluation results lead improvement methods of measurement reproducibility as follows. 1. It is important to point the landmarks proximal to the knee carefully because the contribution of the motion error is higher than the distal landmarks. 2. To reduce the registration error, thigh and shank receivers should be set close to the knee as possible. 3. If the allowance area of the sampling error is in 2.0 mm diameter circle, Diagnosis error using IKDC Knee examination form is approximately 20 %.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)125-139
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing
    Volume7
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Orthopedics
    Sampling
    Bone

    Keywords

    • Bio-Motion
    • Biomechanics
    • Knee Laxity Diagnosis
    • Magnetic Tracker
    • Medical and Welfare Assistance
    • Medical Quantitation
    • Orthopaedic Physical Examination

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering

    Cite this

    Study of anatomical landmark sampling error effect on motion measurement reproducibility for orthopaedic physical examination assisting system. / Okamoto, Jun; Kumasaka, Yu; Kawamura, Kazuya; Matsumoto, Tomoyuki; Kubo, Seiji; Muratsu, Hirotsugu; Kurosaka, Masahiro; Fujie, Masakatsu G.

    In: Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2013, p. 125-139.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Okamoto, Jun ; Kumasaka, Yu ; Kawamura, Kazuya ; Matsumoto, Tomoyuki ; Kubo, Seiji ; Muratsu, Hirotsugu ; Kurosaka, Masahiro ; Fujie, Masakatsu G. / Study of anatomical landmark sampling error effect on motion measurement reproducibility for orthopaedic physical examination assisting system. In: Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing. 2013 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 125-139.
    @article{3a7e1e61e9334decb98b246bbd9af868,
    title = "Study of anatomical landmark sampling error effect on motion measurement reproducibility for orthopaedic physical examination assisting system",
    abstract = "We have been developing the Orthopaedic physical examination assisting system using magnetic position tracker to quantitate knee laxity diagnosis. In this study, to investigate the influence of anatomical landmark sampling error for bone coordinate registration, reproducibility verification simulation was done. Firstly, the motion data of imitation bones was acquired using the system and set as a reference data. To get the error motion data, virtual error vectors were added on the reference sampling points and new motion data was recomputed. Evaluation was executed by comparison with the reference data and recomputed data. The evaluation results lead improvement methods of measurement reproducibility as follows. 1. It is important to point the landmarks proximal to the knee carefully because the contribution of the motion error is higher than the distal landmarks. 2. To reduce the registration error, thigh and shank receivers should be set close to the knee as possible. 3. If the allowance area of the sampling error is in 2.0 mm diameter circle, Diagnosis error using IKDC Knee examination form is approximately 20 {\%}.",
    keywords = "Bio-Motion, Biomechanics, Knee Laxity Diagnosis, Magnetic Tracker, Medical and Welfare Assistance, Medical Quantitation, Orthopaedic Physical Examination",
    author = "Jun Okamoto and Yu Kumasaka and Kazuya Kawamura and Tomoyuki Matsumoto and Seiji Kubo and Hirotsugu Muratsu and Masahiro Kurosaka and Fujie, {Masakatsu G.}",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1299/jamdsm.7.125",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "125--139",
    journal = "Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing",
    issn = "1881-3054",
    publisher = "Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Study of anatomical landmark sampling error effect on motion measurement reproducibility for orthopaedic physical examination assisting system

    AU - Okamoto, Jun

    AU - Kumasaka, Yu

    AU - Kawamura, Kazuya

    AU - Matsumoto, Tomoyuki

    AU - Kubo, Seiji

    AU - Muratsu, Hirotsugu

    AU - Kurosaka, Masahiro

    AU - Fujie, Masakatsu G.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - We have been developing the Orthopaedic physical examination assisting system using magnetic position tracker to quantitate knee laxity diagnosis. In this study, to investigate the influence of anatomical landmark sampling error for bone coordinate registration, reproducibility verification simulation was done. Firstly, the motion data of imitation bones was acquired using the system and set as a reference data. To get the error motion data, virtual error vectors were added on the reference sampling points and new motion data was recomputed. Evaluation was executed by comparison with the reference data and recomputed data. The evaluation results lead improvement methods of measurement reproducibility as follows. 1. It is important to point the landmarks proximal to the knee carefully because the contribution of the motion error is higher than the distal landmarks. 2. To reduce the registration error, thigh and shank receivers should be set close to the knee as possible. 3. If the allowance area of the sampling error is in 2.0 mm diameter circle, Diagnosis error using IKDC Knee examination form is approximately 20 %.

    AB - We have been developing the Orthopaedic physical examination assisting system using magnetic position tracker to quantitate knee laxity diagnosis. In this study, to investigate the influence of anatomical landmark sampling error for bone coordinate registration, reproducibility verification simulation was done. Firstly, the motion data of imitation bones was acquired using the system and set as a reference data. To get the error motion data, virtual error vectors were added on the reference sampling points and new motion data was recomputed. Evaluation was executed by comparison with the reference data and recomputed data. The evaluation results lead improvement methods of measurement reproducibility as follows. 1. It is important to point the landmarks proximal to the knee carefully because the contribution of the motion error is higher than the distal landmarks. 2. To reduce the registration error, thigh and shank receivers should be set close to the knee as possible. 3. If the allowance area of the sampling error is in 2.0 mm diameter circle, Diagnosis error using IKDC Knee examination form is approximately 20 %.

    KW - Bio-Motion

    KW - Biomechanics

    KW - Knee Laxity Diagnosis

    KW - Magnetic Tracker

    KW - Medical and Welfare Assistance

    KW - Medical Quantitation

    KW - Orthopaedic Physical Examination

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878959151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878959151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1299/jamdsm.7.125

    DO - 10.1299/jamdsm.7.125

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 125

    EP - 139

    JO - Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing

    JF - Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing

    SN - 1881-3054

    IS - 2

    ER -