The birth of judicial review in Japan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Judicial review was introduced to Japan when the current constitution took effect in May 1947; this paper examines how it was institutionalized in the postwar period. Although it was established almost by accident, judicial review has profoundly transformed the Japanese political process. We can recognize the full meaning and potential of judicial review only when we try to understand it in the historical context of Japanese constitutionalism. The old Meiji constitutional regime, which had no provision and practice for judicial review, was based on the concept of the kokutai, a system in which the emperors, in one line unbroken for eternity, held and exercised sovereign power. This orthodoxy prevented the Meiji regime from developing fully its liberal democratic potential. In contrast, the current constitution declares universalistic principles of government. Due respect for the fundamental rights of citizens and the principle of popular sovereignty have transformed politics from a vertical hierarchy to a horizontal relation among equals through mutual persuasion, in which judicial review must be situated. Finally, this paper discusses a lèse majesté case that marks Japan having reached, painfully, a new stage of liberal democratization.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)308-331
    Number of pages24
    JournalInternational Journal of Constitutional Law
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007 Apr 15

    Fingerprint

    constitution
    Japan
    regime
    constitutionalism
    fundamental right
    post-war period
    persuasion
    sovereignty
    democratization
    respect
    citizen
    politics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Cite this

    The birth of judicial review in Japan. / Kawagishi, Norikazu.

    In: International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 5, No. 2, 15.04.2007, p. 308-331.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{9e700b671dff43a39c86df60e90a0b04,
    title = "The birth of judicial review in Japan",
    abstract = "Judicial review was introduced to Japan when the current constitution took effect in May 1947; this paper examines how it was institutionalized in the postwar period. Although it was established almost by accident, judicial review has profoundly transformed the Japanese political process. We can recognize the full meaning and potential of judicial review only when we try to understand it in the historical context of Japanese constitutionalism. The old Meiji constitutional regime, which had no provision and practice for judicial review, was based on the concept of the kokutai, a system in which the emperors, in one line unbroken for eternity, held and exercised sovereign power. This orthodoxy prevented the Meiji regime from developing fully its liberal democratic potential. In contrast, the current constitution declares universalistic principles of government. Due respect for the fundamental rights of citizens and the principle of popular sovereignty have transformed politics from a vertical hierarchy to a horizontal relation among equals through mutual persuasion, in which judicial review must be situated. Finally, this paper discusses a l{\`e}se majest{\'e} case that marks Japan having reached, painfully, a new stage of liberal democratization.",
    author = "Norikazu Kawagishi",
    year = "2007",
    month = "4",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1093/icon/mom011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "308--331",
    journal = "International Journal of Constitutional Law",
    issn = "1474-2640",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The birth of judicial review in Japan

    AU - Kawagishi, Norikazu

    PY - 2007/4/15

    Y1 - 2007/4/15

    N2 - Judicial review was introduced to Japan when the current constitution took effect in May 1947; this paper examines how it was institutionalized in the postwar period. Although it was established almost by accident, judicial review has profoundly transformed the Japanese political process. We can recognize the full meaning and potential of judicial review only when we try to understand it in the historical context of Japanese constitutionalism. The old Meiji constitutional regime, which had no provision and practice for judicial review, was based on the concept of the kokutai, a system in which the emperors, in one line unbroken for eternity, held and exercised sovereign power. This orthodoxy prevented the Meiji regime from developing fully its liberal democratic potential. In contrast, the current constitution declares universalistic principles of government. Due respect for the fundamental rights of citizens and the principle of popular sovereignty have transformed politics from a vertical hierarchy to a horizontal relation among equals through mutual persuasion, in which judicial review must be situated. Finally, this paper discusses a lèse majesté case that marks Japan having reached, painfully, a new stage of liberal democratization.

    AB - Judicial review was introduced to Japan when the current constitution took effect in May 1947; this paper examines how it was institutionalized in the postwar period. Although it was established almost by accident, judicial review has profoundly transformed the Japanese political process. We can recognize the full meaning and potential of judicial review only when we try to understand it in the historical context of Japanese constitutionalism. The old Meiji constitutional regime, which had no provision and practice for judicial review, was based on the concept of the kokutai, a system in which the emperors, in one line unbroken for eternity, held and exercised sovereign power. This orthodoxy prevented the Meiji regime from developing fully its liberal democratic potential. In contrast, the current constitution declares universalistic principles of government. Due respect for the fundamental rights of citizens and the principle of popular sovereignty have transformed politics from a vertical hierarchy to a horizontal relation among equals through mutual persuasion, in which judicial review must be situated. Finally, this paper discusses a lèse majesté case that marks Japan having reached, painfully, a new stage of liberal democratization.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247259494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247259494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/icon/mom011

    DO - 10.1093/icon/mom011

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:34247259494

    VL - 5

    SP - 308

    EP - 331

    JO - International Journal of Constitutional Law

    JF - International Journal of Constitutional Law

    SN - 1474-2640

    IS - 2

    ER -