The cost of misinformation in deadly conflicts

Hawk-dove games and suicidal terrorism

James E. Hanley, John Orbell, Tomonori Morikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The hijacking and purposeful crashing of airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, prompts questions about why the passengers and crew of those airplanes did not act to prevent these attacks, as did at least some passengers on a hijacked flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. We argue, first, that humans have an evolved cognitive bias that leads to the expectation that antagonists hope to survive conflict and, second, that highly credible information to the contrary is needed to overcome this bias. Absent such information, the passengers on at least two airplanes incorrectly interpreted the game being played as a hawk-dove version of a conflict-of-interest game, when it was actually a "suicidal terrorism" variant of that family. Given that other terrorists may have been in the air and ready to act, the airlines' policy of not informing passengers about such events could have risked disabling them from reacting forcefully when force alone was advisable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-18
Number of pages6
JournalPolitics and the Life Sciences
Volume21
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2002 Mar

Fingerprint

aircraft
terrorism
costs
September 11, 2001
conflict of interest
trend
world trade
flight
air
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The cost of misinformation in deadly conflicts : Hawk-dove games and suicidal terrorism. / Hanley, James E.; Orbell, John; Morikawa, Tomonori.

In: Politics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 21, No. 1, 03.2002, p. 13-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86d3493526be47b5bba83e16521340ef,
title = "The cost of misinformation in deadly conflicts: Hawk-dove games and suicidal terrorism",
abstract = "The hijacking and purposeful crashing of airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, prompts questions about why the passengers and crew of those airplanes did not act to prevent these attacks, as did at least some passengers on a hijacked flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. We argue, first, that humans have an evolved cognitive bias that leads to the expectation that antagonists hope to survive conflict and, second, that highly credible information to the contrary is needed to overcome this bias. Absent such information, the passengers on at least two airplanes incorrectly interpreted the game being played as a hawk-dove version of a conflict-of-interest game, when it was actually a {"}suicidal terrorism{"} variant of that family. Given that other terrorists may have been in the air and ready to act, the airlines' policy of not informing passengers about such events could have risked disabling them from reacting forcefully when force alone was advisable.",
author = "Hanley, {James E.} and John Orbell and Tomonori Morikawa",
year = "2002",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "13--18",
journal = "Politics and the Life Sciences",
issn = "0730-9384",
publisher = "Association for Politics and the Life Sciences",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cost of misinformation in deadly conflicts

T2 - Hawk-dove games and suicidal terrorism

AU - Hanley, James E.

AU - Orbell, John

AU - Morikawa, Tomonori

PY - 2002/3

Y1 - 2002/3

N2 - The hijacking and purposeful crashing of airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, prompts questions about why the passengers and crew of those airplanes did not act to prevent these attacks, as did at least some passengers on a hijacked flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. We argue, first, that humans have an evolved cognitive bias that leads to the expectation that antagonists hope to survive conflict and, second, that highly credible information to the contrary is needed to overcome this bias. Absent such information, the passengers on at least two airplanes incorrectly interpreted the game being played as a hawk-dove version of a conflict-of-interest game, when it was actually a "suicidal terrorism" variant of that family. Given that other terrorists may have been in the air and ready to act, the airlines' policy of not informing passengers about such events could have risked disabling them from reacting forcefully when force alone was advisable.

AB - The hijacking and purposeful crashing of airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, prompts questions about why the passengers and crew of those airplanes did not act to prevent these attacks, as did at least some passengers on a hijacked flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. We argue, first, that humans have an evolved cognitive bias that leads to the expectation that antagonists hope to survive conflict and, second, that highly credible information to the contrary is needed to overcome this bias. Absent such information, the passengers on at least two airplanes incorrectly interpreted the game being played as a hawk-dove version of a conflict-of-interest game, when it was actually a "suicidal terrorism" variant of that family. Given that other terrorists may have been in the air and ready to act, the airlines' policy of not informing passengers about such events could have risked disabling them from reacting forcefully when force alone was advisable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25844443339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25844443339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 13

EP - 18

JO - Politics and the Life Sciences

JF - Politics and the Life Sciences

SN - 0730-9384

IS - 1

ER -