The effects of awareness-raising through stimulated recall on the repeated performance of the same task and on a new task of the same type

Chris Sheppard, Rod Ellis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study explores the effects of intervening between the performance of the same task and whether these effects transfer to a new task. 40 Japanese university students completed the same monologic narrative task three times and then performed a new task of the same type (Time 4). 20 students just performed the tasks (the task-repetition group). The other 20 engaged in a stimulated recall procedure after the initial performance of the first task (the stimulated recall group). In both groups, structural complexity increased from Time 1 to Time 2 and was maintained, including in the new task. In contrast, accuracy remained the same for both groups when the same task was repeated and decreased notably in the new task. Fluency improved in both groups when the same task was repeated but declined when the new task was performed. However, performance of the new task was still significantly better than at Time 1. No differences were evident in complexity and accuracy between the task-repetition and the stimulated recall groups over time. The stimulated recall group demonstrated greater fluency than the task-repetition group when repeating the same task but not the new task. The chapter concludes with comments on the potential of stimulated recall as a means for enhancing the effects of task repetition.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTask-Based Language Teaching
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
Pages171-192
Number of pages22
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

performance
Group
student
time
narrative
university

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The effects of awareness-raising through stimulated recall on the repeated performance of the same task and on a new task of the same type. / Sheppard, Chris; Ellis, Rod.

Task-Based Language Teaching. Vol. 11 John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018. p. 171-192.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Sheppard, Chris ; Ellis, Rod. / The effects of awareness-raising through stimulated recall on the repeated performance of the same task and on a new task of the same type. Task-Based Language Teaching. Vol. 11 John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2018. pp. 171-192
@inbook{47314e1ffe594e538deb08691d8a9c1a,
title = "The effects of awareness-raising through stimulated recall on the repeated performance of the same task and on a new task of the same type",
abstract = "The study explores the effects of intervening between the performance of the same task and whether these effects transfer to a new task. 40 Japanese university students completed the same monologic narrative task three times and then performed a new task of the same type (Time 4). 20 students just performed the tasks (the task-repetition group). The other 20 engaged in a stimulated recall procedure after the initial performance of the first task (the stimulated recall group). In both groups, structural complexity increased from Time 1 to Time 2 and was maintained, including in the new task. In contrast, accuracy remained the same for both groups when the same task was repeated and decreased notably in the new task. Fluency improved in both groups when the same task was repeated but declined when the new task was performed. However, performance of the new task was still significantly better than at Time 1. No differences were evident in complexity and accuracy between the task-repetition and the stimulated recall groups over time. The stimulated recall group demonstrated greater fluency than the task-repetition group when repeating the same task but not the new task. The chapter concludes with comments on the potential of stimulated recall as a means for enhancing the effects of task repetition.",
author = "Chris Sheppard and Rod Ellis",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/tblt.11.07she",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "171--192",
booktitle = "Task-Based Language Teaching",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
address = "Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The effects of awareness-raising through stimulated recall on the repeated performance of the same task and on a new task of the same type

AU - Sheppard, Chris

AU - Ellis, Rod

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The study explores the effects of intervening between the performance of the same task and whether these effects transfer to a new task. 40 Japanese university students completed the same monologic narrative task three times and then performed a new task of the same type (Time 4). 20 students just performed the tasks (the task-repetition group). The other 20 engaged in a stimulated recall procedure after the initial performance of the first task (the stimulated recall group). In both groups, structural complexity increased from Time 1 to Time 2 and was maintained, including in the new task. In contrast, accuracy remained the same for both groups when the same task was repeated and decreased notably in the new task. Fluency improved in both groups when the same task was repeated but declined when the new task was performed. However, performance of the new task was still significantly better than at Time 1. No differences were evident in complexity and accuracy between the task-repetition and the stimulated recall groups over time. The stimulated recall group demonstrated greater fluency than the task-repetition group when repeating the same task but not the new task. The chapter concludes with comments on the potential of stimulated recall as a means for enhancing the effects of task repetition.

AB - The study explores the effects of intervening between the performance of the same task and whether these effects transfer to a new task. 40 Japanese university students completed the same monologic narrative task three times and then performed a new task of the same type (Time 4). 20 students just performed the tasks (the task-repetition group). The other 20 engaged in a stimulated recall procedure after the initial performance of the first task (the stimulated recall group). In both groups, structural complexity increased from Time 1 to Time 2 and was maintained, including in the new task. In contrast, accuracy remained the same for both groups when the same task was repeated and decreased notably in the new task. Fluency improved in both groups when the same task was repeated but declined when the new task was performed. However, performance of the new task was still significantly better than at Time 1. No differences were evident in complexity and accuracy between the task-repetition and the stimulated recall groups over time. The stimulated recall group demonstrated greater fluency than the task-repetition group when repeating the same task but not the new task. The chapter concludes with comments on the potential of stimulated recall as a means for enhancing the effects of task repetition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063999779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063999779&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/tblt.11.07she

DO - 10.1075/tblt.11.07she

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85063999779

VL - 11

SP - 171

EP - 192

BT - Task-Based Language Teaching

PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company

ER -