The effects of repetition and dual-task on the output monitoring errors

Eriko Sugimori, Masashi Nakanishi, Hidetsugu Komeda, Kohei Tsunemi, Takashi Kusumi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated output-monitoring errors in a modified source-monitoring paradigm. Unlike the traditional paradigm that involves two phases, learning and monitoring, the modified paradigm involves three phases, learning, enactment, and monitoring. Three experiments produced two major findings. First, compared with the traditional paradigm, the modified paradigm produced fewer monitoring errors. Second, performing a dual-task during the enactment phase increased monitoring errors for the items that participants repeatedly enacted during the learning phase. In contrast, performing a dual-task during the learning phase did not influence monitoring errors. It only decreased the number of items that were enacted during the enactment phase. We concluded that monitoring errors are more likely to occur (a) when the modality of items matches between the learning and enactment phases (i.e., items are enacted during both phases), and (b) when a dual-task increases processing demands during the enactment phase.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-251
Number of pages8
JournalShinrigaku Kenkyu
Volume76
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2005 Aug
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning

Keywords

  • Enactment
  • Image
  • Metacognition
  • Output-monitoring
  • Source-monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Sugimori, E., Nakanishi, M., Komeda, H., Tsunemi, K., & Kusumi, T. (2005). The effects of repetition and dual-task on the output monitoring errors. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 76(3), 244-251.

The effects of repetition and dual-task on the output monitoring errors. / Sugimori, Eriko; Nakanishi, Masashi; Komeda, Hidetsugu; Tsunemi, Kohei; Kusumi, Takashi.

In: Shinrigaku Kenkyu, Vol. 76, No. 3, 08.2005, p. 244-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sugimori, E, Nakanishi, M, Komeda, H, Tsunemi, K & Kusumi, T 2005, 'The effects of repetition and dual-task on the output monitoring errors', Shinrigaku Kenkyu, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 244-251.
Sugimori E, Nakanishi M, Komeda H, Tsunemi K, Kusumi T. The effects of repetition and dual-task on the output monitoring errors. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2005 Aug;76(3):244-251.
Sugimori, Eriko ; Nakanishi, Masashi ; Komeda, Hidetsugu ; Tsunemi, Kohei ; Kusumi, Takashi. / The effects of repetition and dual-task on the output monitoring errors. In: Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2005 ; Vol. 76, No. 3. pp. 244-251.
@article{491dcd96fa77433e9921f8da5da7c8e3,
title = "The effects of repetition and dual-task on the output monitoring errors",
abstract = "We investigated output-monitoring errors in a modified source-monitoring paradigm. Unlike the traditional paradigm that involves two phases, learning and monitoring, the modified paradigm involves three phases, learning, enactment, and monitoring. Three experiments produced two major findings. First, compared with the traditional paradigm, the modified paradigm produced fewer monitoring errors. Second, performing a dual-task during the enactment phase increased monitoring errors for the items that participants repeatedly enacted during the learning phase. In contrast, performing a dual-task during the learning phase did not influence monitoring errors. It only decreased the number of items that were enacted during the enactment phase. We concluded that monitoring errors are more likely to occur (a) when the modality of items matches between the learning and enactment phases (i.e., items are enacted during both phases), and (b) when a dual-task increases processing demands during the enactment phase.",
keywords = "Enactment, Image, Metacognition, Output-monitoring, Source-monitoring",
author = "Eriko Sugimori and Masashi Nakanishi and Hidetsugu Komeda and Kohei Tsunemi and Takashi Kusumi",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "244--251",
journal = "Shinrigaku Kenkyu",
issn = "0021-5236",
publisher = "Japanese Psychological Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of repetition and dual-task on the output monitoring errors

AU - Sugimori, Eriko

AU - Nakanishi, Masashi

AU - Komeda, Hidetsugu

AU - Tsunemi, Kohei

AU - Kusumi, Takashi

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - We investigated output-monitoring errors in a modified source-monitoring paradigm. Unlike the traditional paradigm that involves two phases, learning and monitoring, the modified paradigm involves three phases, learning, enactment, and monitoring. Three experiments produced two major findings. First, compared with the traditional paradigm, the modified paradigm produced fewer monitoring errors. Second, performing a dual-task during the enactment phase increased monitoring errors for the items that participants repeatedly enacted during the learning phase. In contrast, performing a dual-task during the learning phase did not influence monitoring errors. It only decreased the number of items that were enacted during the enactment phase. We concluded that monitoring errors are more likely to occur (a) when the modality of items matches between the learning and enactment phases (i.e., items are enacted during both phases), and (b) when a dual-task increases processing demands during the enactment phase.

AB - We investigated output-monitoring errors in a modified source-monitoring paradigm. Unlike the traditional paradigm that involves two phases, learning and monitoring, the modified paradigm involves three phases, learning, enactment, and monitoring. Three experiments produced two major findings. First, compared with the traditional paradigm, the modified paradigm produced fewer monitoring errors. Second, performing a dual-task during the enactment phase increased monitoring errors for the items that participants repeatedly enacted during the learning phase. In contrast, performing a dual-task during the learning phase did not influence monitoring errors. It only decreased the number of items that were enacted during the enactment phase. We concluded that monitoring errors are more likely to occur (a) when the modality of items matches between the learning and enactment phases (i.e., items are enacted during both phases), and (b) when a dual-task increases processing demands during the enactment phase.

KW - Enactment

KW - Image

KW - Metacognition

KW - Output-monitoring

KW - Source-monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32944465307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32944465307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 244

EP - 251

JO - Shinrigaku Kenkyu

JF - Shinrigaku Kenkyu

SN - 0021-5236

IS - 3

ER -