The effects of uncontested elections on legislator performance

David M. Konisky, Michiko Ueda

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Political competition lies at the core of representative democracy. Yet, uncompetitive elections and uncontested races are widespread in the United States, particularly at the state level. In this article, we analyze the consequences of uncontested elections on lawmaking activity. Our primary hypothesis is that legislators who run unopposed are less active lawmakers than those who were selected through competitive elections. Studying roll-call vote participation and bill introduction and enactment for most of the U.S. states for 1999-2000, we find that state legislators elected in unopposed elections perform more poorly compared to their colleagues elected in competitive contests.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)199-229
    Number of pages31
    JournalLegislative Studies Quarterly
    Volume36
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011 May

    Fingerprint

    election
    performance
    representative democracy
    bill
    voter
    participation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    The effects of uncontested elections on legislator performance. / Konisky, David M.; Ueda, Michiko.

    In: Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2, 05.2011, p. 199-229.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d0d5e9f2c17f440bbfefb5ccec49981f,
    title = "The effects of uncontested elections on legislator performance",
    abstract = "Political competition lies at the core of representative democracy. Yet, uncompetitive elections and uncontested races are widespread in the United States, particularly at the state level. In this article, we analyze the consequences of uncontested elections on lawmaking activity. Our primary hypothesis is that legislators who run unopposed are less active lawmakers than those who were selected through competitive elections. Studying roll-call vote participation and bill introduction and enactment for most of the U.S. states for 1999-2000, we find that state legislators elected in unopposed elections perform more poorly compared to their colleagues elected in competitive contests.",
    author = "Konisky, {David M.} and Michiko Ueda",
    year = "2011",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00011.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "199--229",
    journal = "Legislative Studies Quarterly",
    issn = "0362-9805",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The effects of uncontested elections on legislator performance

    AU - Konisky, David M.

    AU - Ueda, Michiko

    PY - 2011/5

    Y1 - 2011/5

    N2 - Political competition lies at the core of representative democracy. Yet, uncompetitive elections and uncontested races are widespread in the United States, particularly at the state level. In this article, we analyze the consequences of uncontested elections on lawmaking activity. Our primary hypothesis is that legislators who run unopposed are less active lawmakers than those who were selected through competitive elections. Studying roll-call vote participation and bill introduction and enactment for most of the U.S. states for 1999-2000, we find that state legislators elected in unopposed elections perform more poorly compared to their colleagues elected in competitive contests.

    AB - Political competition lies at the core of representative democracy. Yet, uncompetitive elections and uncontested races are widespread in the United States, particularly at the state level. In this article, we analyze the consequences of uncontested elections on lawmaking activity. Our primary hypothesis is that legislators who run unopposed are less active lawmakers than those who were selected through competitive elections. Studying roll-call vote participation and bill introduction and enactment for most of the U.S. states for 1999-2000, we find that state legislators elected in unopposed elections perform more poorly compared to their colleagues elected in competitive contests.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955604554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955604554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00011.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00011.x

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:79955604554

    VL - 36

    SP - 199

    EP - 229

    JO - Legislative Studies Quarterly

    JF - Legislative Studies Quarterly

    SN - 0362-9805

    IS - 2

    ER -