The influence of decision heuristics and overconfidence on multiattribute choice

A process-tracing study

Marcus Selart, Bård Kuvaas, Ole Boe, Kazuhisa Takemura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present study it was shown that decision heuristics and confidence judgements play important roles in the building of preferences. Based on a dual-process account of thinking, the study compared people who did well versus poorly on a series of decision heuristics and overconfidence judgement tasks. The two groups were found to differ with regard to their information search behaviour in introduced multiattribute choice tasks. High performers on the judgemental tasks were less influenced in their decision processes by numerical information format (probabilities vs. frequencies) compared to low performers. They also looked at more attributes and spent more time on the multiattribute choice tasks. The results reveal that performance on decision heuristics and overconfidence tasks has a bearing both on heuristic and analytic processes in multiattribute decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-453
Number of pages17
JournalEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 May

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Heuristics
Thinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

The influence of decision heuristics and overconfidence on multiattribute choice : A process-tracing study. / Selart, Marcus; Kuvaas, Bård; Boe, Ole; Takemura, Kazuhisa.

In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 437-453.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b0b54e2586c4f40beb2eaaf329b3349,
title = "The influence of decision heuristics and overconfidence on multiattribute choice: A process-tracing study",
abstract = "In the present study it was shown that decision heuristics and confidence judgements play important roles in the building of preferences. Based on a dual-process account of thinking, the study compared people who did well versus poorly on a series of decision heuristics and overconfidence judgement tasks. The two groups were found to differ with regard to their information search behaviour in introduced multiattribute choice tasks. High performers on the judgemental tasks were less influenced in their decision processes by numerical information format (probabilities vs. frequencies) compared to low performers. They also looked at more attributes and spent more time on the multiattribute choice tasks. The results reveal that performance on decision heuristics and overconfidence tasks has a bearing both on heuristic and analytic processes in multiattribute decision making.",
author = "Marcus Selart and B{\aa}rd Kuvaas and Ole Boe and Kazuhisa Takemura",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/09541440500173054",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "437--453",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "2044-5911",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of decision heuristics and overconfidence on multiattribute choice

T2 - A process-tracing study

AU - Selart, Marcus

AU - Kuvaas, Bård

AU - Boe, Ole

AU - Takemura, Kazuhisa

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - In the present study it was shown that decision heuristics and confidence judgements play important roles in the building of preferences. Based on a dual-process account of thinking, the study compared people who did well versus poorly on a series of decision heuristics and overconfidence judgement tasks. The two groups were found to differ with regard to their information search behaviour in introduced multiattribute choice tasks. High performers on the judgemental tasks were less influenced in their decision processes by numerical information format (probabilities vs. frequencies) compared to low performers. They also looked at more attributes and spent more time on the multiattribute choice tasks. The results reveal that performance on decision heuristics and overconfidence tasks has a bearing both on heuristic and analytic processes in multiattribute decision making.

AB - In the present study it was shown that decision heuristics and confidence judgements play important roles in the building of preferences. Based on a dual-process account of thinking, the study compared people who did well versus poorly on a series of decision heuristics and overconfidence judgement tasks. The two groups were found to differ with regard to their information search behaviour in introduced multiattribute choice tasks. High performers on the judgemental tasks were less influenced in their decision processes by numerical information format (probabilities vs. frequencies) compared to low performers. They also looked at more attributes and spent more time on the multiattribute choice tasks. The results reveal that performance on decision heuristics and overconfidence tasks has a bearing both on heuristic and analytic processes in multiattribute decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646369430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646369430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09541440500173054

DO - 10.1080/09541440500173054

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 437

EP - 453

JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 2044-5911

IS - 3

ER -