The limits of liberal-democracy promotion

Christopher Edward Hobson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the few unambiguously positive outcomes of the George W. Bush years is a greater interest in the practice of democracy promotion. However, the expansion of scholarship in this area has not been matched by an equal expansion in its scope. There continues to be an overwhelming tendency to focus exclusively on empirical case studies and policy prescriptions, usually informed by a set of unstated liberal assumptions. Nothing is necessarily wrong with this per se. The problem stems from the lack of attention directed toward the larger theoretical and conceptual frameworks that inform and shape these practices. Responding to this state of affairs, this article examines the way certain theoretical tendencies and commitments have helped give rise to many problematic aspects of liberal democracy promotion. It is necessary to challenge the restrictive framework that currently dominates. It is argued that to do so entails rethinking, extending, and pluralizing the way democracy itself is conceived.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-405
Number of pages23
JournalAlternatives
Volume34
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

promotion
democracy
medication
commitment
lack

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Democracy promotion
  • Democratization
  • Liberalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Hobson, C. E. (2009). The limits of liberal-democracy promotion. Alternatives, 34(4), 383-405.

The limits of liberal-democracy promotion. / Hobson, Christopher Edward.

In: Alternatives, Vol. 34, No. 4, 2009, p. 383-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hobson, CE 2009, 'The limits of liberal-democracy promotion', Alternatives, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 383-405.
Hobson, Christopher Edward. / The limits of liberal-democracy promotion. In: Alternatives. 2009 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 383-405.
@article{196328c4f14e4767a2868a631cd84dbe,
title = "The limits of liberal-democracy promotion",
abstract = "One of the few unambiguously positive outcomes of the George W. Bush years is a greater interest in the practice of democracy promotion. However, the expansion of scholarship in this area has not been matched by an equal expansion in its scope. There continues to be an overwhelming tendency to focus exclusively on empirical case studies and policy prescriptions, usually informed by a set of unstated liberal assumptions. Nothing is necessarily wrong with this per se. The problem stems from the lack of attention directed toward the larger theoretical and conceptual frameworks that inform and shape these practices. Responding to this state of affairs, this article examines the way certain theoretical tendencies and commitments have helped give rise to many problematic aspects of liberal democracy promotion. It is necessary to challenge the restrictive framework that currently dominates. It is argued that to do so entails rethinking, extending, and pluralizing the way democracy itself is conceived.",
keywords = "Democracy, Democracy promotion, Democratization, Liberalism",
author = "Hobson, {Christopher Edward}",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "383--405",
journal = "Alternatives",
issn = "0304-3754",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The limits of liberal-democracy promotion

AU - Hobson, Christopher Edward

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - One of the few unambiguously positive outcomes of the George W. Bush years is a greater interest in the practice of democracy promotion. However, the expansion of scholarship in this area has not been matched by an equal expansion in its scope. There continues to be an overwhelming tendency to focus exclusively on empirical case studies and policy prescriptions, usually informed by a set of unstated liberal assumptions. Nothing is necessarily wrong with this per se. The problem stems from the lack of attention directed toward the larger theoretical and conceptual frameworks that inform and shape these practices. Responding to this state of affairs, this article examines the way certain theoretical tendencies and commitments have helped give rise to many problematic aspects of liberal democracy promotion. It is necessary to challenge the restrictive framework that currently dominates. It is argued that to do so entails rethinking, extending, and pluralizing the way democracy itself is conceived.

AB - One of the few unambiguously positive outcomes of the George W. Bush years is a greater interest in the practice of democracy promotion. However, the expansion of scholarship in this area has not been matched by an equal expansion in its scope. There continues to be an overwhelming tendency to focus exclusively on empirical case studies and policy prescriptions, usually informed by a set of unstated liberal assumptions. Nothing is necessarily wrong with this per se. The problem stems from the lack of attention directed toward the larger theoretical and conceptual frameworks that inform and shape these practices. Responding to this state of affairs, this article examines the way certain theoretical tendencies and commitments have helped give rise to many problematic aspects of liberal democracy promotion. It is necessary to challenge the restrictive framework that currently dominates. It is argued that to do so entails rethinking, extending, and pluralizing the way democracy itself is conceived.

KW - Democracy

KW - Democracy promotion

KW - Democratization

KW - Liberalism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951450970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951450970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 383

EP - 405

JO - Alternatives

JF - Alternatives

SN - 0304-3754

IS - 4

ER -