The position of the Low Carbon Growth Partnership (LCGP)

at the end of Japan's navigation between the Kyoto Protocol and the APP

Chaewoon Oh, Shunji Matsuoka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A new climate change institutional package, the East Asia Low Carbon Growth Partnership (LCGP), has been recently developed. The LCGP has significant implications because it was initiated by Japan, which has navigated between the Kyoto Protocol (KP) and the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP) but ended the navigation by announcing its intention not to participate in the second commitment period of the KP. This paper investigates the position of the LCGP on the spectrum drawn by the KP and the APP using the theoretical ground of normative contestation. Results show that the normative stance of the LCGP is skewed toward the APP; however, the LCGP differentiates itself from the APP by its own functional properties and through its institutional fit with another regional institution, the East Asia Summit. The LCGP puts another complexion on global climate change governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2013

Fingerprint

Kyoto Protocol
Japan
climate change
Carbon
Navigation
climate
commitment
governance

Keywords

  • Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate
  • Climate change governance
  • East Asia Low Carbon Growth Partnership
  • Japan
  • Kyoto Protocol
  • Normative position

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

@article{c7387dc0a48a42b6a3e90f241a7a7c01,
title = "The position of the Low Carbon Growth Partnership (LCGP): at the end of Japan's navigation between the Kyoto Protocol and the APP",
abstract = "A new climate change institutional package, the East Asia Low Carbon Growth Partnership (LCGP), has been recently developed. The LCGP has significant implications because it was initiated by Japan, which has navigated between the Kyoto Protocol (KP) and the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP) but ended the navigation by announcing its intention not to participate in the second commitment period of the KP. This paper investigates the position of the LCGP on the spectrum drawn by the KP and the APP using the theoretical ground of normative contestation. Results show that the normative stance of the LCGP is skewed toward the APP; however, the LCGP differentiates itself from the APP by its own functional properties and through its institutional fit with another regional institution, the East Asia Summit. The LCGP puts another complexion on global climate change governance.",
keywords = "Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, Climate change governance, East Asia Low Carbon Growth Partnership, Japan, Kyoto Protocol, Normative position",
author = "Chaewoon Oh and Shunji Matsuoka",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s10784-013-9219-0",
language = "English",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
issn = "1567-9764",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The position of the Low Carbon Growth Partnership (LCGP)

T2 - at the end of Japan's navigation between the Kyoto Protocol and the APP

AU - Oh, Chaewoon

AU - Matsuoka, Shunji

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A new climate change institutional package, the East Asia Low Carbon Growth Partnership (LCGP), has been recently developed. The LCGP has significant implications because it was initiated by Japan, which has navigated between the Kyoto Protocol (KP) and the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP) but ended the navigation by announcing its intention not to participate in the second commitment period of the KP. This paper investigates the position of the LCGP on the spectrum drawn by the KP and the APP using the theoretical ground of normative contestation. Results show that the normative stance of the LCGP is skewed toward the APP; however, the LCGP differentiates itself from the APP by its own functional properties and through its institutional fit with another regional institution, the East Asia Summit. The LCGP puts another complexion on global climate change governance.

AB - A new climate change institutional package, the East Asia Low Carbon Growth Partnership (LCGP), has been recently developed. The LCGP has significant implications because it was initiated by Japan, which has navigated between the Kyoto Protocol (KP) and the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP) but ended the navigation by announcing its intention not to participate in the second commitment period of the KP. This paper investigates the position of the LCGP on the spectrum drawn by the KP and the APP using the theoretical ground of normative contestation. Results show that the normative stance of the LCGP is skewed toward the APP; however, the LCGP differentiates itself from the APP by its own functional properties and through its institutional fit with another regional institution, the East Asia Summit. The LCGP puts another complexion on global climate change governance.

KW - Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate

KW - Climate change governance

KW - East Asia Low Carbon Growth Partnership

KW - Japan

KW - Kyoto Protocol

KW - Normative position

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878730809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878730809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10784-013-9219-0

DO - 10.1007/s10784-013-9219-0

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

SN - 1567-9764

ER -