The processing difference between person names and common nouns in sentence contexts: an ERP study

Lin Wang, Rinus G. Verdonschot, Yufang Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Person names and common nouns differ in how they are stored in the mental lexicon. Using event-related potentials, this study compared the integration of names and nouns into sentence contexts. Both person names and common nouns were highly related in meaning and either congruent or incongruent within the previous contexts. Name incongruence elicited an N400 effect, suggesting that people were able to rapidly retrieve the semantic meaning of names from long-term memory even when this process was mediated by person identification. Conversely, participants showed a “good enough” processing of the nouns due to their low specificity level and, thus, rich semantic associations, leading to a P600 effect. These distinctive ERP effects provide clear evidence for the distinctive semantic representations of these word categories by showing that the activation of a name’s meaning is mediated by a single connection between identity-specific information and person identity, whereas multiple connections exist between nouns and their meanings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-108
Number of pages15
JournalPsychological Research
Volume80
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Names
Semantics
Long-Term Memory
Evoked Potentials
Common Noun
Sentence Context
Person
Nouns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The processing difference between person names and common nouns in sentence contexts : an ERP study. / Wang, Lin; Verdonschot, Rinus G.; Yang, Yufang.

In: Psychological Research, Vol. 80, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 94-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, Lin ; Verdonschot, Rinus G. ; Yang, Yufang. / The processing difference between person names and common nouns in sentence contexts : an ERP study. In: Psychological Research. 2016 ; Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 94-108.
@article{d27ade63a925447f9a1143931130f570,
title = "The processing difference between person names and common nouns in sentence contexts: an ERP study",
abstract = "Person names and common nouns differ in how they are stored in the mental lexicon. Using event-related potentials, this study compared the integration of names and nouns into sentence contexts. Both person names and common nouns were highly related in meaning and either congruent or incongruent within the previous contexts. Name incongruence elicited an N400 effect, suggesting that people were able to rapidly retrieve the semantic meaning of names from long-term memory even when this process was mediated by person identification. Conversely, participants showed a “good enough” processing of the nouns due to their low specificity level and, thus, rich semantic associations, leading to a P600 effect. These distinctive ERP effects provide clear evidence for the distinctive semantic representations of these word categories by showing that the activation of a name’s meaning is mediated by a single connection between identity-specific information and person identity, whereas multiple connections exist between nouns and their meanings.",
author = "Lin Wang and Verdonschot, {Rinus G.} and Yufang Yang",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00426-014-0645-6",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "94--108",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The processing difference between person names and common nouns in sentence contexts

T2 - an ERP study

AU - Wang, Lin

AU - Verdonschot, Rinus G.

AU - Yang, Yufang

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Person names and common nouns differ in how they are stored in the mental lexicon. Using event-related potentials, this study compared the integration of names and nouns into sentence contexts. Both person names and common nouns were highly related in meaning and either congruent or incongruent within the previous contexts. Name incongruence elicited an N400 effect, suggesting that people were able to rapidly retrieve the semantic meaning of names from long-term memory even when this process was mediated by person identification. Conversely, participants showed a “good enough” processing of the nouns due to their low specificity level and, thus, rich semantic associations, leading to a P600 effect. These distinctive ERP effects provide clear evidence for the distinctive semantic representations of these word categories by showing that the activation of a name’s meaning is mediated by a single connection between identity-specific information and person identity, whereas multiple connections exist between nouns and their meanings.

AB - Person names and common nouns differ in how they are stored in the mental lexicon. Using event-related potentials, this study compared the integration of names and nouns into sentence contexts. Both person names and common nouns were highly related in meaning and either congruent or incongruent within the previous contexts. Name incongruence elicited an N400 effect, suggesting that people were able to rapidly retrieve the semantic meaning of names from long-term memory even when this process was mediated by person identification. Conversely, participants showed a “good enough” processing of the nouns due to their low specificity level and, thus, rich semantic associations, leading to a P600 effect. These distinctive ERP effects provide clear evidence for the distinctive semantic representations of these word categories by showing that the activation of a name’s meaning is mediated by a single connection between identity-specific information and person identity, whereas multiple connections exist between nouns and their meanings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954415029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954415029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00426-014-0645-6

DO - 10.1007/s00426-014-0645-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 25575756

AN - SCOPUS:84954415029

VL - 80

SP - 94

EP - 108

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

IS - 1

ER -