The rise of safe havens for threatened cultural heritage

Nikolaus Thaddaus Paumgartner, Raphael Zingg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In light of the recent rise of destruction and looting of cultural property, a need for formalized heritage protection has arisen. Increasingly popular in the debate has become the instrument of international assistance known as safe havens. These temporary refuges for at-risk cultural goods in a third country have recently been implemented by Switzerland, France, the United States, and the Association of Art Museum Directors. We assess the contributions and shortcomings of these four regimes using a comparative approach. Mainly, we find that, despite variations in their scope and structure, none of the models accounts entirely for today's major difficulties in protecting endangered cultural properties. We draw recommendations for future safe haven states against the backdrop of the existing models and hope to see the instrument used in practice as a way to safely isolate cultural property from destructive conflicts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-346
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Cultural Property
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Aug 1

Fingerprint

cultural heritage
third countries
Switzerland
museum
director
assistance
France
regime
art
Cultural Property
Rise
Cultural Heritage

Keywords

  • Comparative law
  • Cultural heritage protection
  • Safe havens

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Conservation
  • Cultural Studies
  • History
  • Anthropology
  • Museology

Cite this

The rise of safe havens for threatened cultural heritage. / Paumgartner, Nikolaus Thaddaus; Zingg, Raphael.

In: International Journal of Cultural Property, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.08.2018, p. 323-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Paumgartner, Nikolaus Thaddaus ; Zingg, Raphael. / The rise of safe havens for threatened cultural heritage. In: International Journal of Cultural Property. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 323-346.
@article{1bd6bc88259f4402984aa32ceb4f2c50,
title = "The rise of safe havens for threatened cultural heritage",
abstract = "In light of the recent rise of destruction and looting of cultural property, a need for formalized heritage protection has arisen. Increasingly popular in the debate has become the instrument of international assistance known as safe havens. These temporary refuges for at-risk cultural goods in a third country have recently been implemented by Switzerland, France, the United States, and the Association of Art Museum Directors. We assess the contributions and shortcomings of these four regimes using a comparative approach. Mainly, we find that, despite variations in their scope and structure, none of the models accounts entirely for today's major difficulties in protecting endangered cultural properties. We draw recommendations for future safe haven states against the backdrop of the existing models and hope to see the instrument used in practice as a way to safely isolate cultural property from destructive conflicts.",
keywords = "Comparative law, Cultural heritage protection, Safe havens",
author = "Paumgartner, {Nikolaus Thaddaus} and Raphael Zingg",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0940739118000188",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "323--346",
journal = "International Journal of Cultural Property",
issn = "0940-7391",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The rise of safe havens for threatened cultural heritage

AU - Paumgartner, Nikolaus Thaddaus

AU - Zingg, Raphael

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - In light of the recent rise of destruction and looting of cultural property, a need for formalized heritage protection has arisen. Increasingly popular in the debate has become the instrument of international assistance known as safe havens. These temporary refuges for at-risk cultural goods in a third country have recently been implemented by Switzerland, France, the United States, and the Association of Art Museum Directors. We assess the contributions and shortcomings of these four regimes using a comparative approach. Mainly, we find that, despite variations in their scope and structure, none of the models accounts entirely for today's major difficulties in protecting endangered cultural properties. We draw recommendations for future safe haven states against the backdrop of the existing models and hope to see the instrument used in practice as a way to safely isolate cultural property from destructive conflicts.

AB - In light of the recent rise of destruction and looting of cultural property, a need for formalized heritage protection has arisen. Increasingly popular in the debate has become the instrument of international assistance known as safe havens. These temporary refuges for at-risk cultural goods in a third country have recently been implemented by Switzerland, France, the United States, and the Association of Art Museum Directors. We assess the contributions and shortcomings of these four regimes using a comparative approach. Mainly, we find that, despite variations in their scope and structure, none of the models accounts entirely for today's major difficulties in protecting endangered cultural properties. We draw recommendations for future safe haven states against the backdrop of the existing models and hope to see the instrument used in practice as a way to safely isolate cultural property from destructive conflicts.

KW - Comparative law

KW - Cultural heritage protection

KW - Safe havens

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059953734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059953734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0940739118000188

DO - 10.1017/S0940739118000188

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85059953734

VL - 25

SP - 323

EP - 346

JO - International Journal of Cultural Property

JF - International Journal of Cultural Property

SN - 0940-7391

IS - 3

ER -