Towards a more responsive judiciary: Courts and judicial power in japan

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    Following the collapse of the regime under the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, the liberal democratization of Japanese society has been the most pressing issue in postwar Japan. The current Japanese Constitution, which was promulgated on 3 November 1946 and took effect half a year later, fortified the judiciary, vesting the highest court in Japan with autonomous institutional authority and the power of judicial. The expansion of judicial power over administrative cases, strengthening judicial independence, and the conception of constitutional rights with judicial promised to fulfill expectations for a new era immediately after the establishment of the new constitutional system. However, the Supreme Court and the judiciary as a whole have played a relatively minor role in the liberal democratization of postwar Japanese society. It can by no means be said that administrative and constitutional litigation, in particular, are or have been as lively as they were expected to be when the current Constitution was promulgated. That is why nobody has earnestly applauded or reproached the Supreme Court. Around the end of the twentieth century, the Japanese government started an eagerly awaited discussion on judicial reform. In July 1999, the Cabinet established the Justice System Reform Council to clarify the role to be played by justice in Japanese society in the twenty-first century examining and deliberating fundamental measures necessary for the realization of a justice system that is easy for the people to utilize, participation by the people in the justice system, achievement of a legal profession as it should be and strengthening the functions thereof, and other reforms of the justice system, as well as improvements in the infrastructure of that system.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAsian Courts in Context
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages77-111
    Number of pages35
    ISBN (Print)9781107588813, 9781107066083
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1

    Fingerprint

    judicial power
    judiciary
    Japan
    justice
    constitution
    reform
    democratization
    Supreme Court
    legal profession
    twenty-first century
    twentieth century
    regime
    infrastructure
    participation
    Society

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Towards a more responsive judiciary : Courts and judicial power in japan. / Kawagishi, Norikazu.

    Asian Courts in Context. Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 77-111.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Kawagishi, Norikazu. / Towards a more responsive judiciary : Courts and judicial power in japan. Asian Courts in Context. Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp. 77-111
    @inbook{1d0d4cf5d0864dfdb186736ea478b49d,
    title = "Towards a more responsive judiciary: Courts and judicial power in japan",
    abstract = "Following the collapse of the regime under the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, the liberal democratization of Japanese society has been the most pressing issue in postwar Japan. The current Japanese Constitution, which was promulgated on 3 November 1946 and took effect half a year later, fortified the judiciary, vesting the highest court in Japan with autonomous institutional authority and the power of judicial. The expansion of judicial power over administrative cases, strengthening judicial independence, and the conception of constitutional rights with judicial promised to fulfill expectations for a new era immediately after the establishment of the new constitutional system. However, the Supreme Court and the judiciary as a whole have played a relatively minor role in the liberal democratization of postwar Japanese society. It can by no means be said that administrative and constitutional litigation, in particular, are or have been as lively as they were expected to be when the current Constitution was promulgated. That is why nobody has earnestly applauded or reproached the Supreme Court. Around the end of the twentieth century, the Japanese government started an eagerly awaited discussion on judicial reform. In July 1999, the Cabinet established the Justice System Reform Council to clarify the role to be played by justice in Japanese society in the twenty-first century examining and deliberating fundamental measures necessary for the realization of a justice system that is easy for the people to utilize, participation by the people in the justice system, achievement of a legal profession as it should be and strengthening the functions thereof, and other reforms of the justice system, as well as improvements in the infrastructure of that system.",
    author = "Norikazu Kawagishi",
    year = "2014",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9781107588813.003",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781107588813",
    pages = "77--111",
    booktitle = "Asian Courts in Context",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Towards a more responsive judiciary

    T2 - Courts and judicial power in japan

    AU - Kawagishi, Norikazu

    PY - 2014/1/1

    Y1 - 2014/1/1

    N2 - Following the collapse of the regime under the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, the liberal democratization of Japanese society has been the most pressing issue in postwar Japan. The current Japanese Constitution, which was promulgated on 3 November 1946 and took effect half a year later, fortified the judiciary, vesting the highest court in Japan with autonomous institutional authority and the power of judicial. The expansion of judicial power over administrative cases, strengthening judicial independence, and the conception of constitutional rights with judicial promised to fulfill expectations for a new era immediately after the establishment of the new constitutional system. However, the Supreme Court and the judiciary as a whole have played a relatively minor role in the liberal democratization of postwar Japanese society. It can by no means be said that administrative and constitutional litigation, in particular, are or have been as lively as they were expected to be when the current Constitution was promulgated. That is why nobody has earnestly applauded or reproached the Supreme Court. Around the end of the twentieth century, the Japanese government started an eagerly awaited discussion on judicial reform. In July 1999, the Cabinet established the Justice System Reform Council to clarify the role to be played by justice in Japanese society in the twenty-first century examining and deliberating fundamental measures necessary for the realization of a justice system that is easy for the people to utilize, participation by the people in the justice system, achievement of a legal profession as it should be and strengthening the functions thereof, and other reforms of the justice system, as well as improvements in the infrastructure of that system.

    AB - Following the collapse of the regime under the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, the liberal democratization of Japanese society has been the most pressing issue in postwar Japan. The current Japanese Constitution, which was promulgated on 3 November 1946 and took effect half a year later, fortified the judiciary, vesting the highest court in Japan with autonomous institutional authority and the power of judicial. The expansion of judicial power over administrative cases, strengthening judicial independence, and the conception of constitutional rights with judicial promised to fulfill expectations for a new era immediately after the establishment of the new constitutional system. However, the Supreme Court and the judiciary as a whole have played a relatively minor role in the liberal democratization of postwar Japanese society. It can by no means be said that administrative and constitutional litigation, in particular, are or have been as lively as they were expected to be when the current Constitution was promulgated. That is why nobody has earnestly applauded or reproached the Supreme Court. Around the end of the twentieth century, the Japanese government started an eagerly awaited discussion on judicial reform. In July 1999, the Cabinet established the Justice System Reform Council to clarify the role to be played by justice in Japanese society in the twenty-first century examining and deliberating fundamental measures necessary for the realization of a justice system that is easy for the people to utilize, participation by the people in the justice system, achievement of a legal profession as it should be and strengthening the functions thereof, and other reforms of the justice system, as well as improvements in the infrastructure of that system.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953391420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953391420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781107588813.003

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9781107588813.003

    M3 - Chapter

    AN - SCOPUS:84953391420

    SN - 9781107588813

    SN - 9781107066083

    SP - 77

    EP - 111

    BT - Asian Courts in Context

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -