Tracking behavior in persuasive apps: Is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting?

Miyuki Shiraishi; Vili Lehdonvirta; Yasuyuki Washio; Hiroaki Kimura; Chihiro Takayama; Tatsuo Nakajima

doi:10.1145/1520340.1520615

Tracking behavior in persuasive apps: Is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting?

Miyuki Shiraishi, Vili Lehdonvirta, Yasuyuki Washio, Hiroaki Kimura, Chihiro Takayama, Tatsuo Nakajima

School of Fundamental Science and Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the roles for the two types of tracking user behavior. Considering these two types of tracking, sensor based recognition has a great advantage when sensing human activity, but it is not always adequate when tracking in the real world. In this paper, we compare the benefits and drawbacks of sensor-based tracking versus self-reported data in persuasive applications called EcoIsland.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009
Pages	4045-4050
Number of pages	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520615
Publication status	Published - 2009 Sep 22
Event	27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009 - Boston, MA, United States Duration: 2009 Apr 4 → 2009 Apr 9

Publication series

Name	Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Conference

Conference	27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009
Country	United States
City	Boston, MA
Period	09/4/4 → 09/4/9

Fingerprint

Keywords

Automatic sensing
Persuasive technology
Self-reporting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Software
Human-Computer Interaction
Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cite this

Shiraishi, M., Lehdonvirta, V., Washio, Y., Kimura, H., Takayama, C., & Nakajima, T. (2009). Tracking behavior in persuasive apps: Is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting? In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009 (pp. 4045-4050). (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings). https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520615

Tracking behavior in persuasive apps : Is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting? / Shiraishi, Miyuki; Lehdonvirta, Vili; Washio, Yasuyuki; Kimura, Hiroaki; Takayama, Chihiro; Nakajima, Tatsuo.

Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009. 2009. p. 4045-4050 (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Shiraishi, M, Lehdonvirta, V, Washio, Y, Kimura, H, Takayama, C & Nakajima, T 2009, Tracking behavior in persuasive apps: Is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting? in Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, pp. 4045-4050, 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009, Boston, MA, United States, 09/4/4. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520615

Shiraishi M, Lehdonvirta V, Washio Y, Kimura H, Takayama C, Nakajima T. Tracking behavior in persuasive apps: Is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting? In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009. 2009. p. 4045-4050. (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings). https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520615

Shiraishi, Miyuki ; Lehdonvirta, Vili ; Washio, Yasuyuki ; Kimura, Hiroaki ; Takayama, Chihiro ; Nakajima, Tatsuo. / Tracking behavior in persuasive apps : Is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting?. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009. 2009. pp. 4045-4050 (Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings).

@inproceedings{be132e6d155d4d869e55d1150cfd968e,

title = "Tracking behavior in persuasive apps: Is sensor-based detection always better than user self-reporting?",

abstract = "This paper aims to discuss the roles for the two types of tracking user behavior. Considering these two types of tracking, sensor based recognition has a great advantage when sensing human activity, but it is not always adequate when tracking in the real world. In this paper, we compare the benefits and drawbacks of sensor-based tracking versus self-reported data in persuasive applications called EcoIsland.",

keywords = "Automatic sensing, Persuasive technology, Self-reporting",

author = "Miyuki Shiraishi and Vili Lehdonvirta and Yasuyuki Washio and Hiroaki Kimura and Chihiro Takayama and Tatsuo Nakajima",

year = "2009",

month = sep

day = "22",

doi = "10.1145/1520340.1520615",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781605582474",

series = "Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings",

pages = "4045--4050",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009",

note = "27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009 ; Conference date: 04-04-2009 Through 09-04-2009",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Tracking behavior in persuasive apps

T2 - 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009

AU - Shiraishi, Miyuki

AU - Lehdonvirta, Vili

AU - Washio, Yasuyuki

AU - Kimura, Hiroaki

AU - Takayama, Chihiro

AU - Nakajima, Tatsuo

PY - 2009/9/22

Y1 - 2009/9/22

N2 - This paper aims to discuss the roles for the two types of tracking user behavior. Considering these two types of tracking, sensor based recognition has a great advantage when sensing human activity, but it is not always adequate when tracking in the real world. In this paper, we compare the benefits and drawbacks of sensor-based tracking versus self-reported data in persuasive applications called EcoIsland.

AB - This paper aims to discuss the roles for the two types of tracking user behavior. Considering these two types of tracking, sensor based recognition has a great advantage when sensing human activity, but it is not always adequate when tracking in the real world. In this paper, we compare the benefits and drawbacks of sensor-based tracking versus self-reported data in persuasive applications called EcoIsland.

KW - Automatic sensing

KW - Persuasive technology

KW - Self-reporting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349188092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349188092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1520340.1520615

DO - 10.1145/1520340.1520615

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:70349188092

SN - 9781605582474

T3 - Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

SP - 4045

EP - 4050

BT - Proceedings of the 27th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009

Y2 - 4 April 2009 through 9 April 2009

ER -

Access to Document

10.1145/1520340.1520615