Trend of malpractice litigation against neurosurgeons in Japan

An analysis of disclosed database by courts in Japan from 2001 through 2015

Hisashi Nagashima, Yoshitaka Wada, Kazuhiro Hongo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Following the modern raising of public awareness, the numbers of malpractice litigation are increasing in the health care delivery system in Japan despite the extensive efforts of physicians. Authors reviewed the issues of litigation and the reasons for court decision from the healthcare-related negligence lawsuits in the past 15 years in Japan and investigated the cautionary points for reducing potential litigation. Healthcare-related negligence lawsuits between January 2001 and December 2015 were retrieved and sorted in each clinical field from the database in Courts in Japan and investigated on the proportional factors of the claims and court decisions in the neurosurgical field. During the period, 446 of healthcare-related court decisions including 41 against neurosurgeons (9.2%) were retrieved. Three of 41 decisions retrieved were decisions to retries for lower court decisions. In 38 claims against the neurosurgeons, 26 identified the negligence and 12 dismissed. In 26 decisions in favor of the plaintiffs, identified negligence in diagnosis in 4, clinical judgment in 3, technical skills in 5, clinical management in 7 and process of informed consent in 7. Five out of 18 decisions after 2006 were identified as negligence in an informed consent process, and additional one, who was mainly identified in inadequate technical skills also identified existing an inadequate informed consent process as a fundamental cause of litigation. Neurosurgeons are a higher risk group for malpractice litigation in Japan and adequate informed consent is important to reduce the risk of litigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)426-432
Number of pages7
JournalNeurologia Medico-Chirurgica
Volume57
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Malpractice
Jurisprudence
Japan
Databases
Informed Consent
Delivery of Health Care
Neurosurgeons
Physicians

Keywords

  • Court decision
  • Lawsuit
  • Litigation
  • Medical malpractice
  • Neurosurgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Trend of malpractice litigation against neurosurgeons in Japan : An analysis of disclosed database by courts in Japan from 2001 through 2015. / Nagashima, Hisashi; Wada, Yoshitaka; Hongo, Kazuhiro.

In: Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, Vol. 57, No. 8, 01.01.2017, p. 426-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{264bf3edd8bc42dc98e4efd16fafd0ea,
title = "Trend of malpractice litigation against neurosurgeons in Japan: An analysis of disclosed database by courts in Japan from 2001 through 2015",
abstract = "Following the modern raising of public awareness, the numbers of malpractice litigation are increasing in the health care delivery system in Japan despite the extensive efforts of physicians. Authors reviewed the issues of litigation and the reasons for court decision from the healthcare-related negligence lawsuits in the past 15 years in Japan and investigated the cautionary points for reducing potential litigation. Healthcare-related negligence lawsuits between January 2001 and December 2015 were retrieved and sorted in each clinical field from the database in Courts in Japan and investigated on the proportional factors of the claims and court decisions in the neurosurgical field. During the period, 446 of healthcare-related court decisions including 41 against neurosurgeons (9.2{\%}) were retrieved. Three of 41 decisions retrieved were decisions to retries for lower court decisions. In 38 claims against the neurosurgeons, 26 identified the negligence and 12 dismissed. In 26 decisions in favor of the plaintiffs, identified negligence in diagnosis in 4, clinical judgment in 3, technical skills in 5, clinical management in 7 and process of informed consent in 7. Five out of 18 decisions after 2006 were identified as negligence in an informed consent process, and additional one, who was mainly identified in inadequate technical skills also identified existing an inadequate informed consent process as a fundamental cause of litigation. Neurosurgeons are a higher risk group for malpractice litigation in Japan and adequate informed consent is important to reduce the risk of litigation.",
keywords = "Court decision, Lawsuit, Litigation, Medical malpractice, Neurosurgery",
author = "Hisashi Nagashima and Yoshitaka Wada and Kazuhiro Hongo",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0049",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "426--432",
journal = "Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica",
issn = "0387-2572",
publisher = "Japan Neurosurgical Society",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trend of malpractice litigation against neurosurgeons in Japan

T2 - An analysis of disclosed database by courts in Japan from 2001 through 2015

AU - Nagashima, Hisashi

AU - Wada, Yoshitaka

AU - Hongo, Kazuhiro

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Following the modern raising of public awareness, the numbers of malpractice litigation are increasing in the health care delivery system in Japan despite the extensive efforts of physicians. Authors reviewed the issues of litigation and the reasons for court decision from the healthcare-related negligence lawsuits in the past 15 years in Japan and investigated the cautionary points for reducing potential litigation. Healthcare-related negligence lawsuits between January 2001 and December 2015 were retrieved and sorted in each clinical field from the database in Courts in Japan and investigated on the proportional factors of the claims and court decisions in the neurosurgical field. During the period, 446 of healthcare-related court decisions including 41 against neurosurgeons (9.2%) were retrieved. Three of 41 decisions retrieved were decisions to retries for lower court decisions. In 38 claims against the neurosurgeons, 26 identified the negligence and 12 dismissed. In 26 decisions in favor of the plaintiffs, identified negligence in diagnosis in 4, clinical judgment in 3, technical skills in 5, clinical management in 7 and process of informed consent in 7. Five out of 18 decisions after 2006 were identified as negligence in an informed consent process, and additional one, who was mainly identified in inadequate technical skills also identified existing an inadequate informed consent process as a fundamental cause of litigation. Neurosurgeons are a higher risk group for malpractice litigation in Japan and adequate informed consent is important to reduce the risk of litigation.

AB - Following the modern raising of public awareness, the numbers of malpractice litigation are increasing in the health care delivery system in Japan despite the extensive efforts of physicians. Authors reviewed the issues of litigation and the reasons for court decision from the healthcare-related negligence lawsuits in the past 15 years in Japan and investigated the cautionary points for reducing potential litigation. Healthcare-related negligence lawsuits between January 2001 and December 2015 were retrieved and sorted in each clinical field from the database in Courts in Japan and investigated on the proportional factors of the claims and court decisions in the neurosurgical field. During the period, 446 of healthcare-related court decisions including 41 against neurosurgeons (9.2%) were retrieved. Three of 41 decisions retrieved were decisions to retries for lower court decisions. In 38 claims against the neurosurgeons, 26 identified the negligence and 12 dismissed. In 26 decisions in favor of the plaintiffs, identified negligence in diagnosis in 4, clinical judgment in 3, technical skills in 5, clinical management in 7 and process of informed consent in 7. Five out of 18 decisions after 2006 were identified as negligence in an informed consent process, and additional one, who was mainly identified in inadequate technical skills also identified existing an inadequate informed consent process as a fundamental cause of litigation. Neurosurgeons are a higher risk group for malpractice litigation in Japan and adequate informed consent is important to reduce the risk of litigation.

KW - Court decision

KW - Lawsuit

KW - Litigation

KW - Medical malpractice

KW - Neurosurgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027699677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027699677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0049

DO - 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0049

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 426

EP - 432

JO - Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica

JF - Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica

SN - 0387-2572

IS - 8

ER -