Trust and Acceptance of Risks

Satoshi Fujii, Toshiko Kikkawa, Kazuhisa Takemura

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter seeks to understand the determinants of risk acceptance. Thus, it implements a survey (n=200) to ask participants which policy measures would make people accept each of the following risks: nuclear power plants, traffic accidents, food safety, electrical appliances, and medical mishaps. These results indicate that risk acceptance cannot be fully explained only by objectively achieved security, but other factors, such as scientific understanding and trust in workers and organizations, were also found to be important for increasing risk acceptance. Those who wish to increase the public's risk acceptance should appear trustworthy and try to understand the scientific mechanisms of accidents; they should also try to minimize risk damage and probability. Trust is important, especially for risks where accidents can be prevented relatively easily by workers and/or organizations. These risks include those associated with food and medical mishaps. Scientific understanding of risk mechanisms is also important for risk acceptance, especially for risks involving mechanisms that are relatively complex, such as nuclear power and electrical appliance risks.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSystems and Human Science - For Safety, Security and Dependability
PublisherElsevier
Pages113-122
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9780444518132
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Accidents
Public risks
Food safety
Highway accidents
Nuclear energy
Nuclear power plants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Fujii, S., Kikkawa, T., & Takemura, K. (2005). Trust and Acceptance of Risks. In Systems and Human Science - For Safety, Security and Dependability (pp. 113-122). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451813-2/50010-5

Trust and Acceptance of Risks. / Fujii, Satoshi; Kikkawa, Toshiko; Takemura, Kazuhisa.

Systems and Human Science - For Safety, Security and Dependability. Elsevier, 2005. p. 113-122.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Fujii, S, Kikkawa, T & Takemura, K 2005, Trust and Acceptance of Risks. in Systems and Human Science - For Safety, Security and Dependability. Elsevier, pp. 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451813-2/50010-5
Fujii S, Kikkawa T, Takemura K. Trust and Acceptance of Risks. In Systems and Human Science - For Safety, Security and Dependability. Elsevier. 2005. p. 113-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451813-2/50010-5
Fujii, Satoshi ; Kikkawa, Toshiko ; Takemura, Kazuhisa. / Trust and Acceptance of Risks. Systems and Human Science - For Safety, Security and Dependability. Elsevier, 2005. pp. 113-122
@inbook{4ad5ba17d1e343fb87fefeb2929bff07,
title = "Trust and Acceptance of Risks",
abstract = "This chapter seeks to understand the determinants of risk acceptance. Thus, it implements a survey (n=200) to ask participants which policy measures would make people accept each of the following risks: nuclear power plants, traffic accidents, food safety, electrical appliances, and medical mishaps. These results indicate that risk acceptance cannot be fully explained only by objectively achieved security, but other factors, such as scientific understanding and trust in workers and organizations, were also found to be important for increasing risk acceptance. Those who wish to increase the public's risk acceptance should appear trustworthy and try to understand the scientific mechanisms of accidents; they should also try to minimize risk damage and probability. Trust is important, especially for risks where accidents can be prevented relatively easily by workers and/or organizations. These risks include those associated with food and medical mishaps. Scientific understanding of risk mechanisms is also important for risk acceptance, especially for risks involving mechanisms that are relatively complex, such as nuclear power and electrical appliance risks.",
author = "Satoshi Fujii and Toshiko Kikkawa and Kazuhisa Takemura",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1016/B978-044451813-2/50010-5",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780444518132",
pages = "113--122",
booktitle = "Systems and Human Science - For Safety, Security and Dependability",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Trust and Acceptance of Risks

AU - Fujii, Satoshi

AU - Kikkawa, Toshiko

AU - Takemura, Kazuhisa

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - This chapter seeks to understand the determinants of risk acceptance. Thus, it implements a survey (n=200) to ask participants which policy measures would make people accept each of the following risks: nuclear power plants, traffic accidents, food safety, electrical appliances, and medical mishaps. These results indicate that risk acceptance cannot be fully explained only by objectively achieved security, but other factors, such as scientific understanding and trust in workers and organizations, were also found to be important for increasing risk acceptance. Those who wish to increase the public's risk acceptance should appear trustworthy and try to understand the scientific mechanisms of accidents; they should also try to minimize risk damage and probability. Trust is important, especially for risks where accidents can be prevented relatively easily by workers and/or organizations. These risks include those associated with food and medical mishaps. Scientific understanding of risk mechanisms is also important for risk acceptance, especially for risks involving mechanisms that are relatively complex, such as nuclear power and electrical appliance risks.

AB - This chapter seeks to understand the determinants of risk acceptance. Thus, it implements a survey (n=200) to ask participants which policy measures would make people accept each of the following risks: nuclear power plants, traffic accidents, food safety, electrical appliances, and medical mishaps. These results indicate that risk acceptance cannot be fully explained only by objectively achieved security, but other factors, such as scientific understanding and trust in workers and organizations, were also found to be important for increasing risk acceptance. Those who wish to increase the public's risk acceptance should appear trustworthy and try to understand the scientific mechanisms of accidents; they should also try to minimize risk damage and probability. Trust is important, especially for risks where accidents can be prevented relatively easily by workers and/or organizations. These risks include those associated with food and medical mishaps. Scientific understanding of risk mechanisms is also important for risk acceptance, especially for risks involving mechanisms that are relatively complex, such as nuclear power and electrical appliance risks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882883851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882883851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-044451813-2/50010-5

DO - 10.1016/B978-044451813-2/50010-5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780444518132

SP - 113

EP - 122

BT - Systems and Human Science - For Safety, Security and Dependability

PB - Elsevier

ER -