Turing test considered mostly harmless

Daniel Berrar, Akihiko Konagaya, Alfons Schuster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Turing's landmark paper on computing machinery and intelligence is multifaceted and has an underemphasized ethical dimension. Turing's notion of "intelligence" and "thinking" was far more encompassing than the common anthropocentric view may suggest. We discuss a number of open and underrated problems that the common interpretation of the Turing test as a test of machine intelligence entails. We suggest that a more meaningful question than "Can machines think?" is whether modern computing machinery can amplify human intelligence. We cite examples ranging from traditional silicon-based environments to carbon-based, living organisms in order to illustrate that this kind of intelligence amplification is indeed happening today. We conclude that in its interpretation as a test of machine intelligence, the Turing test may indeed be harmful for artificial intelligence (AI); in its wider interpretation, however, it remains an inspiring source for philosophy and AI alike.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-263
Number of pages23
JournalNew Generation Computing
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Oct 1

Keywords

  • Creativity
  • Imitation Game
  • Intelligence Amplification
  • Machine Intelligence
  • Turing Test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software
  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Turing test considered mostly harmless'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this