Uncertainty shocks and the relative price of investment goods

Munechika Katayama, Kwang Hwan Kim

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This study empirically shows that higher uncertainty leads to not only a simultaneous drop in consumption and investment, but also a rise in the relative price of investment goods. This negative relationship between the relative price and quantity of investment suggests that heightened uncertainty depresses investment as an adverse supply shock to the investment sector. We demonstrate that a two-sector sticky price model with realistic asymmetric sectoral price rigidity can successfully account for our empirical findings. In particular, the underlying mechanism behind the negative relationship between the price and quantity of investment is limited intersectoral factor mobility. By contrast, the standard two-sector model featuring perfect factor mobility causes a negative co-movement between consumption and investment, contradicting the business cycle phenomenon.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)163-178
    Number of pages16
    JournalReview of Economic Dynamics
    Volume30
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018 Oct 1

    Fingerprint

    Relative prices
    Uncertainty
    Factor mobility
    Price rigidity
    Sticky prices
    Comovement
    Supply shocks
    Business cycles
    Two-sector model

    Keywords

    • Factor mobility
    • Relative price of investment goods
    • Sticky prices
    • Uncertainty shocks

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Uncertainty shocks and the relative price of investment goods. / Katayama, Munechika; Kim, Kwang Hwan.

    In: Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 30, 01.10.2018, p. 163-178.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{0056629accab474e976edeeb75ba2ece,
    title = "Uncertainty shocks and the relative price of investment goods",
    abstract = "This study empirically shows that higher uncertainty leads to not only a simultaneous drop in consumption and investment, but also a rise in the relative price of investment goods. This negative relationship between the relative price and quantity of investment suggests that heightened uncertainty depresses investment as an adverse supply shock to the investment sector. We demonstrate that a two-sector sticky price model with realistic asymmetric sectoral price rigidity can successfully account for our empirical findings. In particular, the underlying mechanism behind the negative relationship between the price and quantity of investment is limited intersectoral factor mobility. By contrast, the standard two-sector model featuring perfect factor mobility causes a negative co-movement between consumption and investment, contradicting the business cycle phenomenon.",
    keywords = "Factor mobility, Relative price of investment goods, Sticky prices, Uncertainty shocks",
    author = "Munechika Katayama and Kim, {Kwang Hwan}",
    year = "2018",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.red.2018.05.003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "163--178",
    journal = "Review of Economic Dynamics",
    issn = "1094-2025",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Uncertainty shocks and the relative price of investment goods

    AU - Katayama, Munechika

    AU - Kim, Kwang Hwan

    PY - 2018/10/1

    Y1 - 2018/10/1

    N2 - This study empirically shows that higher uncertainty leads to not only a simultaneous drop in consumption and investment, but also a rise in the relative price of investment goods. This negative relationship between the relative price and quantity of investment suggests that heightened uncertainty depresses investment as an adverse supply shock to the investment sector. We demonstrate that a two-sector sticky price model with realistic asymmetric sectoral price rigidity can successfully account for our empirical findings. In particular, the underlying mechanism behind the negative relationship between the price and quantity of investment is limited intersectoral factor mobility. By contrast, the standard two-sector model featuring perfect factor mobility causes a negative co-movement between consumption and investment, contradicting the business cycle phenomenon.

    AB - This study empirically shows that higher uncertainty leads to not only a simultaneous drop in consumption and investment, but also a rise in the relative price of investment goods. This negative relationship between the relative price and quantity of investment suggests that heightened uncertainty depresses investment as an adverse supply shock to the investment sector. We demonstrate that a two-sector sticky price model with realistic asymmetric sectoral price rigidity can successfully account for our empirical findings. In particular, the underlying mechanism behind the negative relationship between the price and quantity of investment is limited intersectoral factor mobility. By contrast, the standard two-sector model featuring perfect factor mobility causes a negative co-movement between consumption and investment, contradicting the business cycle phenomenon.

    KW - Factor mobility

    KW - Relative price of investment goods

    KW - Sticky prices

    KW - Uncertainty shocks

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047736621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047736621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.red.2018.05.003

    DO - 10.1016/j.red.2018.05.003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 163

    EP - 178

    JO - Review of Economic Dynamics

    JF - Review of Economic Dynamics

    SN - 1094-2025

    ER -