Understanding rationality in hobbes and hume

Hun Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many commentators think that Hobbes was committed to an instrumental view of rationality which foreshadows that of David Hume. The Humean conception of instrumental rationality is a conjunction of the following two claims: (a) no preferences or desires can properly be said to be irrational in themselves, and (b) the role of reason or rationality can only be confined to informing the agent with true beliefs about the world, and revealing the most effective means that could satisfy the agent's current ends whatever they happen to be. In this paper, I argue that, unlike what many people think, a careful reading of Hobbes shows that he was committed to neither of these claims.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)687-696
Number of pages10
JournalFilozofia
Volume69
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rationality
David Hume
Thomas Hobbes
Informing
Instrumental Rationality
Commentators
Conception

Keywords

  • Hobbes
  • Hume
  • Instrumental rationality
  • Practical rationality
  • The humean view of rationality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Religious studies

Cite this

Chung, H. (2014). Understanding rationality in hobbes and hume. Filozofia, 69(8), 687-696.

Understanding rationality in hobbes and hume. / Chung, Hun.

In: Filozofia, Vol. 69, No. 8, 01.01.2014, p. 687-696.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chung, H 2014, 'Understanding rationality in hobbes and hume', Filozofia, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 687-696.
Chung H. Understanding rationality in hobbes and hume. Filozofia. 2014 Jan 1;69(8):687-696.
Chung, Hun. / Understanding rationality in hobbes and hume. In: Filozofia. 2014 ; Vol. 69, No. 8. pp. 687-696.
@article{4792dd0f294a4eb6a19923687efaecaa,
title = "Understanding rationality in hobbes and hume",
abstract = "Many commentators think that Hobbes was committed to an instrumental view of rationality which foreshadows that of David Hume. The Humean conception of instrumental rationality is a conjunction of the following two claims: (a) no preferences or desires can properly be said to be irrational in themselves, and (b) the role of reason or rationality can only be confined to informing the agent with true beliefs about the world, and revealing the most effective means that could satisfy the agent's current ends whatever they happen to be. In this paper, I argue that, unlike what many people think, a careful reading of Hobbes shows that he was committed to neither of these claims.",
keywords = "Hobbes, Hume, Instrumental rationality, Practical rationality, The humean view of rationality",
author = "Hun Chung",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "687--696",
journal = "Filozofia",
issn = "0046-385X",
publisher = "Slovak Academy of Sciences - Inst of Philosophy",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding rationality in hobbes and hume

AU - Chung, Hun

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Many commentators think that Hobbes was committed to an instrumental view of rationality which foreshadows that of David Hume. The Humean conception of instrumental rationality is a conjunction of the following two claims: (a) no preferences or desires can properly be said to be irrational in themselves, and (b) the role of reason or rationality can only be confined to informing the agent with true beliefs about the world, and revealing the most effective means that could satisfy the agent's current ends whatever they happen to be. In this paper, I argue that, unlike what many people think, a careful reading of Hobbes shows that he was committed to neither of these claims.

AB - Many commentators think that Hobbes was committed to an instrumental view of rationality which foreshadows that of David Hume. The Humean conception of instrumental rationality is a conjunction of the following two claims: (a) no preferences or desires can properly be said to be irrational in themselves, and (b) the role of reason or rationality can only be confined to informing the agent with true beliefs about the world, and revealing the most effective means that could satisfy the agent's current ends whatever they happen to be. In this paper, I argue that, unlike what many people think, a careful reading of Hobbes shows that he was committed to neither of these claims.

KW - Hobbes

KW - Hume

KW - Instrumental rationality

KW - Practical rationality

KW - The humean view of rationality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961944733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961944733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84961944733

VL - 69

SP - 687

EP - 696

JO - Filozofia

JF - Filozofia

SN - 0046-385X

IS - 8

ER -