Understanding the denial of abuses of human rights connected to sports mega-events*

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Academics debate the positive and negative consequences of hosting sports mega-events, and although there is a general recognition that doing so cannot be a panacea for solving other social issues, who wins and who loses tends to be the same. This article considers why mega-events are not more regularly resisted given the routinization of harm to local populations that they tend to invoke. It develops ideas derived from the late sociologist and criminologist Stanley Cohen concerning the relationships between, and the politics of, denial and acknowledgement, with specific attention to the role of academics, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the media. The article illustrates the difficulties in exposing, contesting and transforming these human rights abuses, but suggests that there are grounds for optimism as new strategies for communicating human rights abuses in connection with sports mega-events are developed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-21
Number of pages11
JournalLeisure Studies
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 2
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

human rights
sport
Sports
abuse
event
nongovernmental organization
politics
local population
social issue
optimism
sociologist
Human rights
Mega-events
Denial
Abuse

Keywords

  • denial
  • human rights
  • Mega-events
  • moral panic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this

Understanding the denial of abuses of human rights connected to sports mega-events* . / Horne, John D.

In: Leisure Studies, Vol. 37, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 11-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d956eb8c4e20419799abb7587d725e03,
title = "Understanding the denial of abuses of human rights connected to sports mega-events*",
abstract = "Academics debate the positive and negative consequences of hosting sports mega-events, and although there is a general recognition that doing so cannot be a panacea for solving other social issues, who wins and who loses tends to be the same. This article considers why mega-events are not more regularly resisted given the routinization of harm to local populations that they tend to invoke. It develops ideas derived from the late sociologist and criminologist Stanley Cohen concerning the relationships between, and the politics of, denial and acknowledgement, with specific attention to the role of academics, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the media. The article illustrates the difficulties in exposing, contesting and transforming these human rights abuses, but suggests that there are grounds for optimism as new strategies for communicating human rights abuses in connection with sports mega-events are developed.",
keywords = "denial, human rights, Mega-events, moral panic",
author = "Horne, {John D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/02614367.2017.1324512",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "11--21",
journal = "Leisure Studies",
issn = "0261-4367",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the denial of abuses of human rights connected to sports mega-events*

AU - Horne, John D.

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - Academics debate the positive and negative consequences of hosting sports mega-events, and although there is a general recognition that doing so cannot be a panacea for solving other social issues, who wins and who loses tends to be the same. This article considers why mega-events are not more regularly resisted given the routinization of harm to local populations that they tend to invoke. It develops ideas derived from the late sociologist and criminologist Stanley Cohen concerning the relationships between, and the politics of, denial and acknowledgement, with specific attention to the role of academics, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the media. The article illustrates the difficulties in exposing, contesting and transforming these human rights abuses, but suggests that there are grounds for optimism as new strategies for communicating human rights abuses in connection with sports mega-events are developed.

AB - Academics debate the positive and negative consequences of hosting sports mega-events, and although there is a general recognition that doing so cannot be a panacea for solving other social issues, who wins and who loses tends to be the same. This article considers why mega-events are not more regularly resisted given the routinization of harm to local populations that they tend to invoke. It develops ideas derived from the late sociologist and criminologist Stanley Cohen concerning the relationships between, and the politics of, denial and acknowledgement, with specific attention to the role of academics, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the media. The article illustrates the difficulties in exposing, contesting and transforming these human rights abuses, but suggests that there are grounds for optimism as new strategies for communicating human rights abuses in connection with sports mega-events are developed.

KW - denial

KW - human rights

KW - Mega-events

KW - moral panic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018663751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018663751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02614367.2017.1324512

DO - 10.1080/02614367.2017.1324512

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85018663751

VL - 37

SP - 11

EP - 21

JO - Leisure Studies

JF - Leisure Studies

SN - 0261-4367

IS - 1

ER -