Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison

Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education

Manuel Förster, Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Sebastian Brückner, Roland Happ, Ronald K. Hambleton, William B. Walstad, Tadayoshi Asano, Michio Yamaoka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cross-national assessment of students' competences in higher education is becoming increasingly important in many disciplines including economics but there are few available instruments that meet psychological standards for assessing students' economic competence in higher education (HE). One of them is the internationally valid Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE), which has been adapted and employed successfully in HE systems in various countries, but the test results have seldom been used for international comparisons of students' Economic Content Knowledge (ECK). Here, we compare the German and the Japanese test adaptations of the TUCE with reference to the American original in order to determine their suitability for comparative analyses of ECK in HE among these countries. Having critically examined the two test adaptations, we present a comparative analysis of students' test scores in Germany and Japan and evaluate potential differences with regard to students' acquisition of ECK while investigating country-specific influence factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-23
Number of pages10
JournalZeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology
Volume223
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Germany
Japan
Economics
Students
Education
Mental Competency
Test Scores
Psychology

Keywords

  • Cross-national assessment
  • Economic competence
  • Germany
  • Higher education
  • Japan

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison : Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education. / Förster, Manuel; Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga; Brückner, Sebastian; Happ, Roland; Hambleton, Ronald K.; Walstad, William B.; Asano, Tadayoshi; Yamaoka, Michio.

In: Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, Vol. 223, No. 1, 2015, p. 14-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Förster, Manuel ; Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga ; Brückner, Sebastian ; Happ, Roland ; Hambleton, Ronald K. ; Walstad, William B. ; Asano, Tadayoshi ; Yamaoka, Michio. / Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison : Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education. In: Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 223, No. 1. pp. 14-23.
@article{5191419b365f4e1c878345e0be6e0082,
title = "Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison: Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education",
abstract = "Cross-national assessment of students' competences in higher education is becoming increasingly important in many disciplines including economics but there are few available instruments that meet psychological standards for assessing students' economic competence in higher education (HE). One of them is the internationally valid Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE), which has been adapted and employed successfully in HE systems in various countries, but the test results have seldom been used for international comparisons of students' Economic Content Knowledge (ECK). Here, we compare the German and the Japanese test adaptations of the TUCE with reference to the American original in order to determine their suitability for comparative analyses of ECK in HE among these countries. Having critically examined the two test adaptations, we present a comparative analysis of students' test scores in Germany and Japan and evaluate potential differences with regard to students' acquisition of ECK while investigating country-specific influence factors.",
keywords = "Cross-national assessment, Economic competence, Germany, Higher education, Japan",
author = "Manuel F{\"o}rster and Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia and Sebastian Br{\"u}ckner and Roland Happ and Hambleton, {Ronald K.} and Walstad, {William B.} and Tadayoshi Asano and Michio Yamaoka",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1027/2151-2604/a000195",
language = "English",
volume = "223",
pages = "14--23",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology",
issn = "2190-8370",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validating test score interpretations by cross-national comparison

T2 - Comparing the results of students from Japan and Germany on an American test of economic knowledge in higher education

AU - Förster, Manuel

AU - Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga

AU - Brückner, Sebastian

AU - Happ, Roland

AU - Hambleton, Ronald K.

AU - Walstad, William B.

AU - Asano, Tadayoshi

AU - Yamaoka, Michio

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Cross-national assessment of students' competences in higher education is becoming increasingly important in many disciplines including economics but there are few available instruments that meet psychological standards for assessing students' economic competence in higher education (HE). One of them is the internationally valid Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE), which has been adapted and employed successfully in HE systems in various countries, but the test results have seldom been used for international comparisons of students' Economic Content Knowledge (ECK). Here, we compare the German and the Japanese test adaptations of the TUCE with reference to the American original in order to determine their suitability for comparative analyses of ECK in HE among these countries. Having critically examined the two test adaptations, we present a comparative analysis of students' test scores in Germany and Japan and evaluate potential differences with regard to students' acquisition of ECK while investigating country-specific influence factors.

AB - Cross-national assessment of students' competences in higher education is becoming increasingly important in many disciplines including economics but there are few available instruments that meet psychological standards for assessing students' economic competence in higher education (HE). One of them is the internationally valid Test of Understanding in College Economics (TUCE), which has been adapted and employed successfully in HE systems in various countries, but the test results have seldom been used for international comparisons of students' Economic Content Knowledge (ECK). Here, we compare the German and the Japanese test adaptations of the TUCE with reference to the American original in order to determine their suitability for comparative analyses of ECK in HE among these countries. Having critically examined the two test adaptations, we present a comparative analysis of students' test scores in Germany and Japan and evaluate potential differences with regard to students' acquisition of ECK while investigating country-specific influence factors.

KW - Cross-national assessment

KW - Economic competence

KW - Germany

KW - Higher education

KW - Japan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922537263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922537263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000195

DO - 10.1027/2151-2604/a000195

M3 - Article

VL - 223

SP - 14

EP - 23

JO - Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

JF - Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

SN - 2190-8370

IS - 1

ER -