[Validity of a standard questionnaire to assess physical activity for specific medical checkups and health guidance].

Ryoko Kawakami, Motohiko Miyachi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the validity of a standard questionnaire to assess amount of physical activity (PA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak). A total of 483 men and women, aged 20 to 69 years, participated. The standard questionnaire included 3 items about exercise, PA, and walking speed. All questions were designed to require an answer of Yes or No. Subjects were classified into one of four groups regarding the number of Yes answers to the three questions, giving activity levels of 0 to 3. The amount of PA was measured objectively with a tn-axial accelerometer which could also calculate daily step counts, and the amounts of PA under 3 metabolic equivalents (METs) and at 3 METs or more. VO2peak. was measured by incremental cycle exercise tests with indirect calorimetry. The daily step counts, the amount of PA at 3 METs or more, and the VO2peak. were significantly higher in subjects who answered Yes to each question than in those who answered No. Sensitivity and specificity of each question were 62-73% and 45-71% for the amount of PA established with the "Exercise and Physical Activity Reference for Health Promotion 2006 (EPAR2006)". The sum of sensitivity and specificity was the highest when the cutoff value was activity level 2 (sensitivity 73%, specificity 68%). Sensitivity and specificity for VO2max established by EPAR2006 were lower than those for the amount of PA. These results suggest that only answering simple questions with a standard questionnaire is sufficient for estimation of PA levels for specific medical checkups and health guidance, even though the accuracy is somewhat limited.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)891-899
Number of pages9
Journal[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
Volume57
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Oct
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise
Health
Metabolic Equivalent
Sensitivity and Specificity
Health Promotion
Surveys and Questionnaires
Indirect Calorimetry
Physical Fitness
Exercise Test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{3e9cc4771237458e95f7424599fdcf0d,
title = "[Validity of a standard questionnaire to assess physical activity for specific medical checkups and health guidance].",
abstract = "This study aimed to determine the validity of a standard questionnaire to assess amount of physical activity (PA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak). A total of 483 men and women, aged 20 to 69 years, participated. The standard questionnaire included 3 items about exercise, PA, and walking speed. All questions were designed to require an answer of Yes or No. Subjects were classified into one of four groups regarding the number of Yes answers to the three questions, giving activity levels of 0 to 3. The amount of PA was measured objectively with a tn-axial accelerometer which could also calculate daily step counts, and the amounts of PA under 3 metabolic equivalents (METs) and at 3 METs or more. VO2peak. was measured by incremental cycle exercise tests with indirect calorimetry. The daily step counts, the amount of PA at 3 METs or more, and the VO2peak. were significantly higher in subjects who answered Yes to each question than in those who answered No. Sensitivity and specificity of each question were 62-73{\%} and 45-71{\%} for the amount of PA established with the {"}Exercise and Physical Activity Reference for Health Promotion 2006 (EPAR2006){"}. The sum of sensitivity and specificity was the highest when the cutoff value was activity level 2 (sensitivity 73{\%}, specificity 68{\%}). Sensitivity and specificity for VO2max established by EPAR2006 were lower than those for the amount of PA. These results suggest that only answering simple questions with a standard questionnaire is sufficient for estimation of PA levels for specific medical checkups and health guidance, even though the accuracy is somewhat limited.",
author = "Ryoko Kawakami and Motohiko Miyachi",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "891--899",
journal = "[Nippon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health",
issn = "0546-1766",
publisher = "Nihon Eisei Gammai/Japanese Society of Public Health",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Validity of a standard questionnaire to assess physical activity for specific medical checkups and health guidance].

AU - Kawakami, Ryoko

AU - Miyachi, Motohiko

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - This study aimed to determine the validity of a standard questionnaire to assess amount of physical activity (PA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak). A total of 483 men and women, aged 20 to 69 years, participated. The standard questionnaire included 3 items about exercise, PA, and walking speed. All questions were designed to require an answer of Yes or No. Subjects were classified into one of four groups regarding the number of Yes answers to the three questions, giving activity levels of 0 to 3. The amount of PA was measured objectively with a tn-axial accelerometer which could also calculate daily step counts, and the amounts of PA under 3 metabolic equivalents (METs) and at 3 METs or more. VO2peak. was measured by incremental cycle exercise tests with indirect calorimetry. The daily step counts, the amount of PA at 3 METs or more, and the VO2peak. were significantly higher in subjects who answered Yes to each question than in those who answered No. Sensitivity and specificity of each question were 62-73% and 45-71% for the amount of PA established with the "Exercise and Physical Activity Reference for Health Promotion 2006 (EPAR2006)". The sum of sensitivity and specificity was the highest when the cutoff value was activity level 2 (sensitivity 73%, specificity 68%). Sensitivity and specificity for VO2max established by EPAR2006 were lower than those for the amount of PA. These results suggest that only answering simple questions with a standard questionnaire is sufficient for estimation of PA levels for specific medical checkups and health guidance, even though the accuracy is somewhat limited.

AB - This study aimed to determine the validity of a standard questionnaire to assess amount of physical activity (PA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak). A total of 483 men and women, aged 20 to 69 years, participated. The standard questionnaire included 3 items about exercise, PA, and walking speed. All questions were designed to require an answer of Yes or No. Subjects were classified into one of four groups regarding the number of Yes answers to the three questions, giving activity levels of 0 to 3. The amount of PA was measured objectively with a tn-axial accelerometer which could also calculate daily step counts, and the amounts of PA under 3 metabolic equivalents (METs) and at 3 METs or more. VO2peak. was measured by incremental cycle exercise tests with indirect calorimetry. The daily step counts, the amount of PA at 3 METs or more, and the VO2peak. were significantly higher in subjects who answered Yes to each question than in those who answered No. Sensitivity and specificity of each question were 62-73% and 45-71% for the amount of PA established with the "Exercise and Physical Activity Reference for Health Promotion 2006 (EPAR2006)". The sum of sensitivity and specificity was the highest when the cutoff value was activity level 2 (sensitivity 73%, specificity 68%). Sensitivity and specificity for VO2max established by EPAR2006 were lower than those for the amount of PA. These results suggest that only answering simple questions with a standard questionnaire is sufficient for estimation of PA levels for specific medical checkups and health guidance, even though the accuracy is somewhat limited.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952199324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952199324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 21174723

AN - SCOPUS:79952199324

VL - 57

SP - 891

EP - 899

JO - [Nippon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health

JF - [Nippon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health

SN - 0546-1766

IS - 10

ER -