Validity, reliability and acceptability of the Japanese version of the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS)

T. Nakayama, Hideki Toyoda, K. Ohno, N. Yoshiike, T. Futagami

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS) is a widely used, self-administered questionnaire to measure subjective well-being. It contains 18 items and was originally hypothesized to have six domains; however, the following studies suggest other factorial models. We devised the schedule's Japanese edition following the standard procedure and tested its psychometric properties considering Japanese cultural characteristics. Subjects were 1224 middle-aged participants undergoing health checkups in Adachi, Tokyo. The reliability of the original version was high: alpha coefficient, 0.90; test-retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the structural validity of the 6-factor, the following 3-factor and 4-factor models (goodness of fit index: 0.932, 0.946 and 0.937, respectively). A new 3-factor model developed after the exclusion of item 11, which had no correlation with the other variables, was proved to have a higher fitness index (0.958) than the other models. This 17-item version showed adequate reliability (α coefficient, 0.91; test-retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85) and concurrent validity compared with the General Health Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Self-rating Depression Scale and Profile Of Mood State (correlation coefficients: -0.75 to -0.53). The median time required to complete the schedule was five minutes. Completing this instrument was easy for 80% of the subjects. These findings attest to the adequacy of the 17-item Japanese GWBS for the comprehensive assessment of individual inner state.

Original languageEnglish
Article number269042
Pages (from-to)529-539
Number of pages11
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Appointments and Schedules
Cultural Characteristics
Depression
Tokyo
Health
Psychometrics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Epidemiologic Studies
Anxiety
Equipment and Supplies
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Acceptability
  • Factor analysis
  • General Well-Being Schedule
  • Questionnaire
  • Reliability
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Validity, reliability and acceptability of the Japanese version of the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS). / Nakayama, T.; Toyoda, Hideki; Ohno, K.; Yoshiike, N.; Futagami, T.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 9, No. 5, 269042, 01.01.2000, p. 529-539.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nakayama, T. ; Toyoda, Hideki ; Ohno, K. ; Yoshiike, N. ; Futagami, T. / Validity, reliability and acceptability of the Japanese version of the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS). In: Quality of Life Research. 2000 ; Vol. 9, No. 5. pp. 529-539.
@article{b151eddd03824e88a0cac57355d7b26e,
title = "Validity, reliability and acceptability of the Japanese version of the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS)",
abstract = "The General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS) is a widely used, self-administered questionnaire to measure subjective well-being. It contains 18 items and was originally hypothesized to have six domains; however, the following studies suggest other factorial models. We devised the schedule's Japanese edition following the standard procedure and tested its psychometric properties considering Japanese cultural characteristics. Subjects were 1224 middle-aged participants undergoing health checkups in Adachi, Tokyo. The reliability of the original version was high: alpha coefficient, 0.90; test-retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the structural validity of the 6-factor, the following 3-factor and 4-factor models (goodness of fit index: 0.932, 0.946 and 0.937, respectively). A new 3-factor model developed after the exclusion of item 11, which had no correlation with the other variables, was proved to have a higher fitness index (0.958) than the other models. This 17-item version showed adequate reliability (α coefficient, 0.91; test-retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85) and concurrent validity compared with the General Health Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Self-rating Depression Scale and Profile Of Mood State (correlation coefficients: -0.75 to -0.53). The median time required to complete the schedule was five minutes. Completing this instrument was easy for 80{\%} of the subjects. These findings attest to the adequacy of the 17-item Japanese GWBS for the comprehensive assessment of individual inner state.",
keywords = "Acceptability, Factor analysis, General Well-Being Schedule, Questionnaire, Reliability, Validity",
author = "T. Nakayama and Hideki Toyoda and K. Ohno and N. Yoshiike and T. Futagami",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1008940902849",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "529--539",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity, reliability and acceptability of the Japanese version of the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS)

AU - Nakayama, T.

AU - Toyoda, Hideki

AU - Ohno, K.

AU - Yoshiike, N.

AU - Futagami, T.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS) is a widely used, self-administered questionnaire to measure subjective well-being. It contains 18 items and was originally hypothesized to have six domains; however, the following studies suggest other factorial models. We devised the schedule's Japanese edition following the standard procedure and tested its psychometric properties considering Japanese cultural characteristics. Subjects were 1224 middle-aged participants undergoing health checkups in Adachi, Tokyo. The reliability of the original version was high: alpha coefficient, 0.90; test-retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the structural validity of the 6-factor, the following 3-factor and 4-factor models (goodness of fit index: 0.932, 0.946 and 0.937, respectively). A new 3-factor model developed after the exclusion of item 11, which had no correlation with the other variables, was proved to have a higher fitness index (0.958) than the other models. This 17-item version showed adequate reliability (α coefficient, 0.91; test-retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85) and concurrent validity compared with the General Health Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Self-rating Depression Scale and Profile Of Mood State (correlation coefficients: -0.75 to -0.53). The median time required to complete the schedule was five minutes. Completing this instrument was easy for 80% of the subjects. These findings attest to the adequacy of the 17-item Japanese GWBS for the comprehensive assessment of individual inner state.

AB - The General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS) is a widely used, self-administered questionnaire to measure subjective well-being. It contains 18 items and was originally hypothesized to have six domains; however, the following studies suggest other factorial models. We devised the schedule's Japanese edition following the standard procedure and tested its psychometric properties considering Japanese cultural characteristics. Subjects were 1224 middle-aged participants undergoing health checkups in Adachi, Tokyo. The reliability of the original version was high: alpha coefficient, 0.90; test-retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the structural validity of the 6-factor, the following 3-factor and 4-factor models (goodness of fit index: 0.932, 0.946 and 0.937, respectively). A new 3-factor model developed after the exclusion of item 11, which had no correlation with the other variables, was proved to have a higher fitness index (0.958) than the other models. This 17-item version showed adequate reliability (α coefficient, 0.91; test-retest Pearson's correlation coefficient, 0.81; and intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.85) and concurrent validity compared with the General Health Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Self-rating Depression Scale and Profile Of Mood State (correlation coefficients: -0.75 to -0.53). The median time required to complete the schedule was five minutes. Completing this instrument was easy for 80% of the subjects. These findings attest to the adequacy of the 17-item Japanese GWBS for the comprehensive assessment of individual inner state.

KW - Acceptability

KW - Factor analysis

KW - General Well-Being Schedule

KW - Questionnaire

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034533919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034533919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1008940902849

DO - 10.1023/A:1008940902849

M3 - Article

C2 - 11190008

AN - SCOPUS:0034533919

VL - 9

SP - 529

EP - 539

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 5

M1 - 269042

ER -