When, how, and why prove theorems? A methodology for studying the perspective of geometry teachers

Patricio Herbst, Takeshi Miyakawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While every theorem has a proof in mathematics, in US geometry classrooms not every theorem is proved. How can one explain the practitioner's perspective on which theorems deserve proof? Toward providing an account of the practical rationality with which practitioners handle the norm that every theorem has a proof we have designed a methodology that relies on representing classroom instruction using animations. We use those animations to trigger commentary from experienced practitioners. In this article we illustrate how we model instructional situations as systems of norms and how we create animated stories that represent a situation. We show how the study of those stories as prototypes of a basic model can help anticipate the response from practitioners as well as suggest issues to be considered in improving a model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469-486
Number of pages18
JournalZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Dec 1
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'When, how, and why prove theorems? A methodology for studying the perspective of geometry teachers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this