Which combinations of personal characteristic types are more effective in different project-based learning courses?

Yusuke Sunaga, Masashi Shuto, Hironori Washizaki, Katsuhiko Kakehi, Yoshiaki Fukazawa, Shoso Yamato, Masashi Okubo

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    To improve practical IT education, many universities are implementing project-based learning (PBL). Although researchers have examined the relationship between projects and personality, they have not investigated the type of projects and team construction based on personality. We consider not to construct optimal team for the view of educational effectiveness if we do not understand the difference of each course characteristic. Herein the Five Factor & Stress theory is used to measure personal characteristics and classify students enrolled in two different PBL courses at a university into four types-leadership, management, tugboat, and anchor. Then knowledge and skills questionnaires are used to measure educational effectiveness. The results show that educational effectiveness is highest when a team consists of management and anchor types but not leadership types in the PBL course which teaches system development, and a team without management types is consisted in the PBL course which teaches IT management strategy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings - 2016 IEEE 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016
    PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
    Pages137-141
    Number of pages5
    ISBN (Electronic)9781509007653
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016 May 19
    Event29th IEEE Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016 - Dallas, United States
    Duration: 2016 Apr 52016 Apr 6

    Other

    Other29th IEEE Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016
    CountryUnited States
    CityDallas
    Period16/4/516/4/6

    Fingerprint

    Anchors
    learning
    Tugboats
    management
    personality
    leadership
    Education
    university education
    system development
    Students
    questionnaire
    university
    student

    Keywords

    • Education
    • Five Factor & Stress Theory (FFS)
    • Personal Characteristic
    • Project Based Learning (PBL)

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Software
    • Education

    Cite this

    Sunaga, Y., Shuto, M., Washizaki, H., Kakehi, K., Fukazawa, Y., Yamato, S., & Okubo, M. (2016). Which combinations of personal characteristic types are more effective in different project-based learning courses? In Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016 (pp. 137-141). [7474477] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2016.21

    Which combinations of personal characteristic types are more effective in different project-based learning courses? / Sunaga, Yusuke; Shuto, Masashi; Washizaki, Hironori; Kakehi, Katsuhiko; Fukazawa, Yoshiaki; Yamato, Shoso; Okubo, Masashi.

    Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016. p. 137-141 7474477.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

    Sunaga, Y, Shuto, M, Washizaki, H, Kakehi, K, Fukazawa, Y, Yamato, S & Okubo, M 2016, Which combinations of personal characteristic types are more effective in different project-based learning courses? in Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016., 7474477, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 137-141, 29th IEEE Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016, Dallas, United States, 16/4/5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2016.21
    Sunaga Y, Shuto M, Washizaki H, Kakehi K, Fukazawa Y, Yamato S et al. Which combinations of personal characteristic types are more effective in different project-based learning courses? In Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2016. p. 137-141. 7474477 https://doi.org/10.1109/CSEET.2016.21
    Sunaga, Yusuke ; Shuto, Masashi ; Washizaki, Hironori ; Kakehi, Katsuhiko ; Fukazawa, Yoshiaki ; Yamato, Shoso ; Okubo, Masashi. / Which combinations of personal characteristic types are more effective in different project-based learning courses?. Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016. pp. 137-141
    @inproceedings{2d7e3a551ed545bbb7788cacd1230e50,
    title = "Which combinations of personal characteristic types are more effective in different project-based learning courses?",
    abstract = "To improve practical IT education, many universities are implementing project-based learning (PBL). Although researchers have examined the relationship between projects and personality, they have not investigated the type of projects and team construction based on personality. We consider not to construct optimal team for the view of educational effectiveness if we do not understand the difference of each course characteristic. Herein the Five Factor & Stress theory is used to measure personal characteristics and classify students enrolled in two different PBL courses at a university into four types-leadership, management, tugboat, and anchor. Then knowledge and skills questionnaires are used to measure educational effectiveness. The results show that educational effectiveness is highest when a team consists of management and anchor types but not leadership types in the PBL course which teaches system development, and a team without management types is consisted in the PBL course which teaches IT management strategy.",
    keywords = "Education, Five Factor & Stress Theory (FFS), Personal Characteristic, Project Based Learning (PBL)",
    author = "Yusuke Sunaga and Masashi Shuto and Hironori Washizaki and Katsuhiko Kakehi and Yoshiaki Fukazawa and Shoso Yamato and Masashi Okubo",
    year = "2016",
    month = "5",
    day = "19",
    doi = "10.1109/CSEET.2016.21",
    language = "English",
    pages = "137--141",
    booktitle = "Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016",
    publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
    address = "United States",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Which combinations of personal characteristic types are more effective in different project-based learning courses?

    AU - Sunaga, Yusuke

    AU - Shuto, Masashi

    AU - Washizaki, Hironori

    AU - Kakehi, Katsuhiko

    AU - Fukazawa, Yoshiaki

    AU - Yamato, Shoso

    AU - Okubo, Masashi

    PY - 2016/5/19

    Y1 - 2016/5/19

    N2 - To improve practical IT education, many universities are implementing project-based learning (PBL). Although researchers have examined the relationship between projects and personality, they have not investigated the type of projects and team construction based on personality. We consider not to construct optimal team for the view of educational effectiveness if we do not understand the difference of each course characteristic. Herein the Five Factor & Stress theory is used to measure personal characteristics and classify students enrolled in two different PBL courses at a university into four types-leadership, management, tugboat, and anchor. Then knowledge and skills questionnaires are used to measure educational effectiveness. The results show that educational effectiveness is highest when a team consists of management and anchor types but not leadership types in the PBL course which teaches system development, and a team without management types is consisted in the PBL course which teaches IT management strategy.

    AB - To improve practical IT education, many universities are implementing project-based learning (PBL). Although researchers have examined the relationship between projects and personality, they have not investigated the type of projects and team construction based on personality. We consider not to construct optimal team for the view of educational effectiveness if we do not understand the difference of each course characteristic. Herein the Five Factor & Stress theory is used to measure personal characteristics and classify students enrolled in two different PBL courses at a university into four types-leadership, management, tugboat, and anchor. Then knowledge and skills questionnaires are used to measure educational effectiveness. The results show that educational effectiveness is highest when a team consists of management and anchor types but not leadership types in the PBL course which teaches system development, and a team without management types is consisted in the PBL course which teaches IT management strategy.

    KW - Education

    KW - Five Factor & Stress Theory (FFS)

    KW - Personal Characteristic

    KW - Project Based Learning (PBL)

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974604654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974604654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1109/CSEET.2016.21

    DO - 10.1109/CSEET.2016.21

    M3 - Conference contribution

    AN - SCOPUS:84974604654

    SP - 137

    EP - 141

    BT - Proceedings - 2016 IEEE 29th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, CSEEandT 2016

    PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

    ER -