Why is it difficult to rectify a misconception in learners ?

Keiichi Magara

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Many people nourish a misconception that vacuums draw substance into them. But vacuums can never draw anything. In fact, air presses substance. This study aimed at investigating why it is difficult for learners to rectify such misconception, by using specially devised questions. Subjects were undergraduates. The main results were as follows ; (1) Once their misconception was provoked, most Ss unintentionally tried to modify their knowledge on the amount of air pressure in such a way as not to contradict their misconception. (2) Even when they were instructed in advance to use the relevant knowledge they had, their misconception couldn't be replaced by the correct concept. (3) But the reasoning process based on the relevant knowledge could be activated under a certain type of questions. (4) So we might infer that two contradictory reasoning processes could coexist in cognitive structure in learners.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)379-388
    Number of pages10
    JournalJapanese Journal of Educational Psychology
    Volume44
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 1996

    Fingerprint

    Vacuum
    air
    Air Pressure
    cognitive structure
    Air

    Keywords

    • Cognitive change
    • Misconception
    • Naive physics
    • Undergraduates

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychology(all)
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology

    Cite this

    Why is it difficult to rectify a misconception in learners ? / Magara, Keiichi.

    In: Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 44, No. 4, 1996, p. 379-388.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{90715b3183174318a8eebb49f684a3c9,
    title = "Why is it difficult to rectify a misconception in learners ?",
    abstract = "Many people nourish a misconception that vacuums draw substance into them. But vacuums can never draw anything. In fact, air presses substance. This study aimed at investigating why it is difficult for learners to rectify such misconception, by using specially devised questions. Subjects were undergraduates. The main results were as follows ; (1) Once their misconception was provoked, most Ss unintentionally tried to modify their knowledge on the amount of air pressure in such a way as not to contradict their misconception. (2) Even when they were instructed in advance to use the relevant knowledge they had, their misconception couldn't be replaced by the correct concept. (3) But the reasoning process based on the relevant knowledge could be activated under a certain type of questions. (4) So we might infer that two contradictory reasoning processes could coexist in cognitive structure in learners.",
    keywords = "Cognitive change, Misconception, Naive physics, Undergraduates",
    author = "Keiichi Magara",
    year = "1996",
    language = "English",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "379--388",
    journal = "Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology",
    issn = "0021-5015",
    publisher = "Japanese Association of Educational Psychology",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why is it difficult to rectify a misconception in learners ?

    AU - Magara, Keiichi

    PY - 1996

    Y1 - 1996

    N2 - Many people nourish a misconception that vacuums draw substance into them. But vacuums can never draw anything. In fact, air presses substance. This study aimed at investigating why it is difficult for learners to rectify such misconception, by using specially devised questions. Subjects were undergraduates. The main results were as follows ; (1) Once their misconception was provoked, most Ss unintentionally tried to modify their knowledge on the amount of air pressure in such a way as not to contradict their misconception. (2) Even when they were instructed in advance to use the relevant knowledge they had, their misconception couldn't be replaced by the correct concept. (3) But the reasoning process based on the relevant knowledge could be activated under a certain type of questions. (4) So we might infer that two contradictory reasoning processes could coexist in cognitive structure in learners.

    AB - Many people nourish a misconception that vacuums draw substance into them. But vacuums can never draw anything. In fact, air presses substance. This study aimed at investigating why it is difficult for learners to rectify such misconception, by using specially devised questions. Subjects were undergraduates. The main results were as follows ; (1) Once their misconception was provoked, most Ss unintentionally tried to modify their knowledge on the amount of air pressure in such a way as not to contradict their misconception. (2) Even when they were instructed in advance to use the relevant knowledge they had, their misconception couldn't be replaced by the correct concept. (3) But the reasoning process based on the relevant knowledge could be activated under a certain type of questions. (4) So we might infer that two contradictory reasoning processes could coexist in cognitive structure in learners.

    KW - Cognitive change

    KW - Misconception

    KW - Naive physics

    KW - Undergraduates

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030328523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030328523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0030328523

    VL - 44

    SP - 379

    EP - 388

    JO - Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology

    JF - Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology

    SN - 0021-5015

    IS - 4

    ER -