Work in progress: A comparison of programming way: Illustration-based programming and text-based programming

Daisuke Saito; Hironori Washizaki; Yoshiaki Fukazawa

doi:10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047

Work in progress: A comparison of programming way: Illustration-based programming and text-based programming

Daisuke Saito, Hironori Washizaki, Yoshiaki Fukazawa

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Learning to programming language is difficult. One solution is to use a digital game, which increases motivation of first-time learners. In this paper, we were executing programming learning with MincraftEdu of sandbox game and ComputerCraftEdu of expansion function. In addition, learning method to programming has illustration-based programming and text-based programming in ComputerCraftEdu. We compare the programming way of illustration programming and text programming. In this result, there was a significant difference towards the illustration-based programming throughout the comparison. In this paper, we present the results.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015
Publisher	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages	220-223
Number of pages	4
ISBN (Print)	9781467392266
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047
Publication status	Published - 2016 Jan 18
Event	4th IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015 - Zhuhai, China Duration: 2015 Dec 10 → 2015 Dec 12

Other

Other	4th IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015
Country/Territory	China
City	Zhuhai
Period	15/12/10 → 15/12/12

Keywords

digital-game-based learning
Minecraft
programming learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Education
Engineering (miscellaneous)

Access to Document

10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047

Cite this

Saito, D., Washizaki, H., & Fukazawa, Y. (2016). Work in progress: A comparison of programming way: Illustration-based programming and text-based programming. In Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015 (pp. 220-223). [7386047] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047

Work in progress : A comparison of programming way: Illustration-based programming and text-based programming. / Saito, Daisuke ; Washizaki, Hironori ; Fukazawa, Yoshiaki.

Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016. p. 220-223 7386047.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Saito, D , Washizaki, H & Fukazawa, Y 2016, Work in progress: A comparison of programming way: Illustration-based programming and text-based programming. in Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015., 7386047, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 220-223, 4th IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015, Zhuhai, China, 15/12/10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047

Saito D , Washizaki H , Fukazawa Y. Work in progress: A comparison of programming way: Illustration-based programming and text-based programming. In Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2016. p. 220-223. 7386047 https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047

@inproceedings{72f7e9104a434d828840a24a0140f359,

title = "Work in progress: A comparison of programming way: Illustration-based programming and text-based programming",

abstract = "Learning to programming language is difficult. One solution is to use a digital game, which increases motivation of first-time learners. In this paper, we were executing programming learning with MincraftEdu of sandbox game and ComputerCraftEdu of expansion function. In addition, learning method to programming has illustration-based programming and text-based programming in ComputerCraftEdu. We compare the programming way of illustration programming and text programming. In this result, there was a significant difference towards the illustration-based programming throughout the comparison. In this paper, we present the results.",

keywords = "digital-game-based learning, Minecraft, programming learning",

author = "Daisuke Saito and Hironori Washizaki and Yoshiaki Fukazawa",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "18",

doi = "10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781467392266",

pages = "220--223",

booktitle = "Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

note = "4th IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015 ; Conference date: 10-12-2015 Through 12-12-2015",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Work in progress

T2 - 4th IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015

AU - Saito, Daisuke

AU - Washizaki, Hironori

AU - Fukazawa, Yoshiaki

PY - 2016/1/18

Y1 - 2016/1/18

N2 - Learning to programming language is difficult. One solution is to use a digital game, which increases motivation of first-time learners. In this paper, we were executing programming learning with MincraftEdu of sandbox game and ComputerCraftEdu of expansion function. In addition, learning method to programming has illustration-based programming and text-based programming in ComputerCraftEdu. We compare the programming way of illustration programming and text programming. In this result, there was a significant difference towards the illustration-based programming throughout the comparison. In this paper, we present the results.

AB - Learning to programming language is difficult. One solution is to use a digital game, which increases motivation of first-time learners. In this paper, we were executing programming learning with MincraftEdu of sandbox game and ComputerCraftEdu of expansion function. In addition, learning method to programming has illustration-based programming and text-based programming in ComputerCraftEdu. We compare the programming way of illustration programming and text programming. In this result, there was a significant difference towards the illustration-based programming throughout the comparison. In this paper, we present the results.

KW - digital-game-based learning

KW - Minecraft

KW - programming learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963558396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963558396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047

DO - 10.1109/TALE.2015.7386047

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84963558396

SN - 9781467392266

SP - 220

EP - 223

BT - Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2015

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

Y2 - 10 December 2015 through 12 December 2015

ER -

Work in progress: A comparison of programming way: Illustration-based programming and text-based programming

Abstract

Other

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this