Zen and the art of neriage: Facilitating consensus building in mathematics inquiry lessons through lesson study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One danger of integrating inquiry-based problem-solving activities into mathematics lessons is that different strategies could be accepted without in-depth discussions on the cogency and efficiency of the strategies. To overcome this issue, Japanese teachers typically go through a series of lesson-study-based teacher learning sessions and learn how to help students build consensus on the best mathematical strategy and think deeply about problem solving (neriage in Japanese). Assuming that this can also be an effective model in other cultural contexts, a video-based lesson study was conducted for a group of US teachers to effectively incorporate consensus building discussions in their mathematical inquiry lessons. Through the lesson study, the teachers learned to release control of class discussions to their students and help them discuss and examine different strategies. This article concludes with various aspects that the teachers learned for effectively implementing neriage in their lessons.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-23
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Mathematics Teacher Education
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Feb 1
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Consensus building
  • Lesson study
  • Mathematical inquiry lesson
  • Neriage
  • Proportional reasoning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Zen and the art of neriage: Facilitating consensus building in mathematics inquiry lessons through lesson study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this