0D/1D turbulent combustion model assessment from an ultra-lean spark ignition engine

Ratnak Sok, Kyohei Yamaguchi, Jin Kusaka

研究成果: Conference article

抄録

This paper focuses on an assessment of predictive combustion model using a 0D/1D simulation tool under high load, different excess air ratio ?, and different combustion stabilities (based on coefficient of variation of indicated mean effective pressure COV imep ). To consider that, crank angle resolved data of experimental pressure of 500 cycles are recorded under engine speed 1000 RPM and 2000 RPM, wide-open throttle, and ?=1.0, 1.42, 1.7, and 2.0. Firstly, model calibration is conducted using 18 cases at 2000 RPM using 500 cycle-averaged in-cylinder pressure to find optimized model constants. Then, the model constants are unchanged for other cases. Next, different cycle-averaged pressure data are used as inputs in the simulation based on the COV imep for studying sensitivity of the turbulent model constants. The simulation is conducted using 1D simulation software GT-Power. Firstly, a three-pressure analysis (TPA) model (intake, in-cylinder, exhaust) for experimental prediction and optimization of burn rate shape are studied. Boundary conditions such as the three pressure histories, intake/exhaust valves timings, boundary temperatures, and exhaust gas emissions are used as model inputs. Errors of indicated thermal efficiency, indicated mean effective pressure, and CA50 are within 3%. Predicted parameters from the TPA model such as air volumetric efficiency, trapped air/fuel vapor mass, trapped residual gas fraction, tumble, and surface temperature of the piston, head, and valves are used as initializations in the predictive combustion model. A built-in flame propagation model, termed as SITurb, is investigated whether it can replicate the in-cylinder pressure and burn rate shapes. A revised laminar flame speed correlation of five-component gasoline surrogate is incorporated in the combustion model via an encrypted dynamic link library file. The results show that thermodynamic histories of the combustion are reproducible under high load and stoichiometric-to-ultra-lean conditions. Under all cases, only turbulent flame speed multiplier needs to be calibrated.

元の言語English
ジャーナルSAE Technical Papers
2019-March
発行部数March
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 2019 3 25
イベント20th SAE Asia-Pacific Automotive Engineering Conference: Next Revolution in Automotive Industry, APAC 2019 - Bangkok, Thailand
継続期間: 2019 4 12019 4 4

Fingerprint

Internal combustion engines
Engine cylinders
Air
Exhaust gases
Gas emissions
Pistons
Gasoline
Vapors
Boundary conditions
Thermodynamics
Calibration
Engines
Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Pollution
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

これを引用

0D/1D turbulent combustion model assessment from an ultra-lean spark ignition engine. / Sok, Ratnak; Yamaguchi, Kyohei; Kusaka, Jin.

:: SAE Technical Papers, 巻 2019-March, 番号 March, 25.03.2019.

研究成果: Conference article

@article{ee79c7518748429eb06e63bae32af47d,
title = "0D/1D turbulent combustion model assessment from an ultra-lean spark ignition engine",
abstract = "This paper focuses on an assessment of predictive combustion model using a 0D/1D simulation tool under high load, different excess air ratio ?, and different combustion stabilities (based on coefficient of variation of indicated mean effective pressure COV imep ). To consider that, crank angle resolved data of experimental pressure of 500 cycles are recorded under engine speed 1000 RPM and 2000 RPM, wide-open throttle, and ?=1.0, 1.42, 1.7, and 2.0. Firstly, model calibration is conducted using 18 cases at 2000 RPM using 500 cycle-averaged in-cylinder pressure to find optimized model constants. Then, the model constants are unchanged for other cases. Next, different cycle-averaged pressure data are used as inputs in the simulation based on the COV imep for studying sensitivity of the turbulent model constants. The simulation is conducted using 1D simulation software GT-Power. Firstly, a three-pressure analysis (TPA) model (intake, in-cylinder, exhaust) for experimental prediction and optimization of burn rate shape are studied. Boundary conditions such as the three pressure histories, intake/exhaust valves timings, boundary temperatures, and exhaust gas emissions are used as model inputs. Errors of indicated thermal efficiency, indicated mean effective pressure, and CA50 are within 3{\%}. Predicted parameters from the TPA model such as air volumetric efficiency, trapped air/fuel vapor mass, trapped residual gas fraction, tumble, and surface temperature of the piston, head, and valves are used as initializations in the predictive combustion model. A built-in flame propagation model, termed as SITurb, is investigated whether it can replicate the in-cylinder pressure and burn rate shapes. A revised laminar flame speed correlation of five-component gasoline surrogate is incorporated in the combustion model via an encrypted dynamic link library file. The results show that thermodynamic histories of the combustion are reproducible under high load and stoichiometric-to-ultra-lean conditions. Under all cases, only turbulent flame speed multiplier needs to be calibrated.",
author = "Ratnak Sok and Kyohei Yamaguchi and Jin Kusaka",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "25",
doi = "10.4271/2019-01-1409",
language = "English",
volume = "2019-March",
journal = "SAE Technical Papers",
issn = "0148-7191",
publisher = "SAE International",
number = "March",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 0D/1D turbulent combustion model assessment from an ultra-lean spark ignition engine

AU - Sok, Ratnak

AU - Yamaguchi, Kyohei

AU - Kusaka, Jin

PY - 2019/3/25

Y1 - 2019/3/25

N2 - This paper focuses on an assessment of predictive combustion model using a 0D/1D simulation tool under high load, different excess air ratio ?, and different combustion stabilities (based on coefficient of variation of indicated mean effective pressure COV imep ). To consider that, crank angle resolved data of experimental pressure of 500 cycles are recorded under engine speed 1000 RPM and 2000 RPM, wide-open throttle, and ?=1.0, 1.42, 1.7, and 2.0. Firstly, model calibration is conducted using 18 cases at 2000 RPM using 500 cycle-averaged in-cylinder pressure to find optimized model constants. Then, the model constants are unchanged for other cases. Next, different cycle-averaged pressure data are used as inputs in the simulation based on the COV imep for studying sensitivity of the turbulent model constants. The simulation is conducted using 1D simulation software GT-Power. Firstly, a three-pressure analysis (TPA) model (intake, in-cylinder, exhaust) for experimental prediction and optimization of burn rate shape are studied. Boundary conditions such as the three pressure histories, intake/exhaust valves timings, boundary temperatures, and exhaust gas emissions are used as model inputs. Errors of indicated thermal efficiency, indicated mean effective pressure, and CA50 are within 3%. Predicted parameters from the TPA model such as air volumetric efficiency, trapped air/fuel vapor mass, trapped residual gas fraction, tumble, and surface temperature of the piston, head, and valves are used as initializations in the predictive combustion model. A built-in flame propagation model, termed as SITurb, is investigated whether it can replicate the in-cylinder pressure and burn rate shapes. A revised laminar flame speed correlation of five-component gasoline surrogate is incorporated in the combustion model via an encrypted dynamic link library file. The results show that thermodynamic histories of the combustion are reproducible under high load and stoichiometric-to-ultra-lean conditions. Under all cases, only turbulent flame speed multiplier needs to be calibrated.

AB - This paper focuses on an assessment of predictive combustion model using a 0D/1D simulation tool under high load, different excess air ratio ?, and different combustion stabilities (based on coefficient of variation of indicated mean effective pressure COV imep ). To consider that, crank angle resolved data of experimental pressure of 500 cycles are recorded under engine speed 1000 RPM and 2000 RPM, wide-open throttle, and ?=1.0, 1.42, 1.7, and 2.0. Firstly, model calibration is conducted using 18 cases at 2000 RPM using 500 cycle-averaged in-cylinder pressure to find optimized model constants. Then, the model constants are unchanged for other cases. Next, different cycle-averaged pressure data are used as inputs in the simulation based on the COV imep for studying sensitivity of the turbulent model constants. The simulation is conducted using 1D simulation software GT-Power. Firstly, a three-pressure analysis (TPA) model (intake, in-cylinder, exhaust) for experimental prediction and optimization of burn rate shape are studied. Boundary conditions such as the three pressure histories, intake/exhaust valves timings, boundary temperatures, and exhaust gas emissions are used as model inputs. Errors of indicated thermal efficiency, indicated mean effective pressure, and CA50 are within 3%. Predicted parameters from the TPA model such as air volumetric efficiency, trapped air/fuel vapor mass, trapped residual gas fraction, tumble, and surface temperature of the piston, head, and valves are used as initializations in the predictive combustion model. A built-in flame propagation model, termed as SITurb, is investigated whether it can replicate the in-cylinder pressure and burn rate shapes. A revised laminar flame speed correlation of five-component gasoline surrogate is incorporated in the combustion model via an encrypted dynamic link library file. The results show that thermodynamic histories of the combustion are reproducible under high load and stoichiometric-to-ultra-lean conditions. Under all cases, only turbulent flame speed multiplier needs to be calibrated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064625103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064625103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4271/2019-01-1409

DO - 10.4271/2019-01-1409

M3 - Conference article

VL - 2019-March

JO - SAE Technical Papers

JF - SAE Technical Papers

SN - 0148-7191

IS - March

ER -