A comparable interpretability study between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method and typical free description: A study on qualitative research for getting evaluation term

Bo Peng, Takaya Kojima

研究成果: Article査読

2 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

The purpose of this study is to explain the difference between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method, or triadic procedure technique, and typical free description. In order to explain the difference between these research methods, a comparison study on the interpretability or effectiveness, of the three research methods for comprehensive evaluation was performed. Furthermore, a classification study on the tendency of evaluation terms extracted from the three research methods was conducted. By doing a comprehensive evaluation based on an individual scaling method, the interpretability of each research method was explained. The result shows that evaluation grid method has high interpretability.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)661-668
ページ数8
ジャーナルJournal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)
81
726
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2016 8

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 環境工学

フィンガープリント

「A comparable interpretability study between evaluation grid method, repertory grid method and typical free description: A study on qualitative research for getting evaluation term」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル