A dual process model for cultural differences in thought

Hiroshi Yama*, Miwa Nishioka, Tomoko Horishita, Yayoi Kawasaki, Junichi Taniguchi

*この研究の対応する著者

研究成果: Article査読

17 被引用数 (Scopus)

抄録

Nisbett et al. (Psychol Rev 108:291-310, 2001) claim that East Asians are likely to use holistic thought to solve problems, whereas Westerners use analytic thought more, and discuss the differences in the frame of the individualism/collectivism distinction. The holistic versus analytic distinction has been the greatest point of interest of dual process theories, which imply that human thinking has two sub processes. We apply a revised dual process model that proposes meme-acquired goals in both systems to explain cultural differences in thought. According to this, gene-installed goals are universal across cultures, whereas meme-acquired goals depend upon culture. To introduce a dual process model means that we discuss adaptation both in terms of culture and natural selection. Hence, we propose an interactive view that supports an adaptive relation between mind and culture.

本文言語English
ページ(範囲)143-172
ページ数30
ジャーナルMind and Society
6
2
DOI
出版ステータスPublished - 2007 11月
外部発表はい

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • 社会心理学
  • 実験心理学および認知心理学
  • 哲学
  • 社会科学(その他)
  • 経済学、計量経済学および金融学(その他)

フィンガープリント

「A dual process model for cultural differences in thought」の研究トピックを掘り下げます。これらがまとまってユニークなフィンガープリントを構成します。

引用スタイル