抄録
The wide spread disbelief and frustrations amongst managers and executives about planning theories do not seem to be caused only by the confusions over concepts and terminology, but also by the absence of a perspective of planning literature from the view point of comprehensive planning behaviour of an individual and an organization. In this paper, to explore the relationships between the concepts discussed in the planning literature, we first briefly review an hypothesis of planning behaviour which we have introduced before (Section 2), and then develop, under the framework of the hypothesis, the dimensions and subdimensions employed in an analysis (Section 3.1). Having listed the "sample" planning literature for the analysis (Section 3.3), the results are shown in the form of tables (Section 3.3). Finally, comments and discussions are made on the methodological problems, on the variety and relative mutual independence between planning concepts, on the normative vs descriptive balance of planning research, on the necessary and possibly fertile areas of future planning research, and on the relation of the analysis to the status of our hypothesis (Section 4).
| 元の言語 | English |
|---|---|
| ページ（範囲） | 138-145 |
| ページ数 | 8 |
| ジャーナル | European Journal of Operational Research |
| 巻 | 12 |
| 発行部数 | 2 |
| DOI | |
| 出版物ステータス | Published - 1983 |
| 外部発表 | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Information Systems and Management
- Management Science and Operations Research
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Applied Mathematics
- Modelling and Simulation
- Transportation
これを引用
A perspective of planning literature. / Matsuda, Takehiko; Hirano, Masaaki.
：: European Journal of Operational Research, 巻 12, 番号 2, 1983, p. 138-145.研究成果: Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - A perspective of planning literature
AU - Matsuda, Takehiko
AU - Hirano, Masaaki
PY - 1983
Y1 - 1983
N2 - The wide spread disbelief and frustrations amongst managers and executives about planning theories do not seem to be caused only by the confusions over concepts and terminology, but also by the absence of a perspective of planning literature from the view point of comprehensive planning behaviour of an individual and an organization. In this paper, to explore the relationships between the concepts discussed in the planning literature, we first briefly review an hypothesis of planning behaviour which we have introduced before (Section 2), and then develop, under the framework of the hypothesis, the dimensions and subdimensions employed in an analysis (Section 3.1). Having listed the "sample" planning literature for the analysis (Section 3.3), the results are shown in the form of tables (Section 3.3). Finally, comments and discussions are made on the methodological problems, on the variety and relative mutual independence between planning concepts, on the normative vs descriptive balance of planning research, on the necessary and possibly fertile areas of future planning research, and on the relation of the analysis to the status of our hypothesis (Section 4).
AB - The wide spread disbelief and frustrations amongst managers and executives about planning theories do not seem to be caused only by the confusions over concepts and terminology, but also by the absence of a perspective of planning literature from the view point of comprehensive planning behaviour of an individual and an organization. In this paper, to explore the relationships between the concepts discussed in the planning literature, we first briefly review an hypothesis of planning behaviour which we have introduced before (Section 2), and then develop, under the framework of the hypothesis, the dimensions and subdimensions employed in an analysis (Section 3.1). Having listed the "sample" planning literature for the analysis (Section 3.3), the results are shown in the form of tables (Section 3.3). Finally, comments and discussions are made on the methodological problems, on the variety and relative mutual independence between planning concepts, on the normative vs descriptive balance of planning research, on the necessary and possibly fertile areas of future planning research, and on the relation of the analysis to the status of our hypothesis (Section 4).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020704498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020704498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0377-2217(83)90217-5
DO - 10.1016/0377-2217(83)90217-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0020704498
VL - 12
SP - 138
EP - 145
JO - European Journal of Operational Research
JF - European Journal of Operational Research
SN - 0377-2217
IS - 2
ER -