A perspective of planning literature

Takehiko Matsuda, Masaaki Hirano

研究成果: Article

2 引用 (Scopus)

抄録

The wide spread disbelief and frustrations amongst managers and executives about planning theories do not seem to be caused only by the confusions over concepts and terminology, but also by the absence of a perspective of planning literature from the view point of comprehensive planning behaviour of an individual and an organization. In this paper, to explore the relationships between the concepts discussed in the planning literature, we first briefly review an hypothesis of planning behaviour which we have introduced before (Section 2), and then develop, under the framework of the hypothesis, the dimensions and subdimensions employed in an analysis (Section 3.1). Having listed the "sample" planning literature for the analysis (Section 3.3), the results are shown in the form of tables (Section 3.3). Finally, comments and discussions are made on the methodological problems, on the variety and relative mutual independence between planning concepts, on the normative vs descriptive balance of planning research, on the necessary and possibly fertile areas of future planning research, and on the relation of the analysis to the status of our hypothesis (Section 4).

元の言語English
ページ(範囲)138-145
ページ数8
ジャーナルEuropean Journal of Operational Research
12
発行部数2
DOI
出版物ステータスPublished - 1983
外部発表Yes

Fingerprint

Planning
planning
planning research
planning theory
frustration
technical language
literature
Frustration
manager
Terminology
organization
Tables
Managers
Necessary
Concepts

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics
  • Modelling and Simulation
  • Transportation

これを引用

A perspective of planning literature. / Matsuda, Takehiko; Hirano, Masaaki.

:: European Journal of Operational Research, 巻 12, 番号 2, 1983, p. 138-145.

研究成果: Article

Matsuda, Takehiko ; Hirano, Masaaki. / A perspective of planning literature. :: European Journal of Operational Research. 1983 ; 巻 12, 番号 2. pp. 138-145.
@article{7c015f3a43b24bc2b2dd0c0d6124ecbc,
title = "A perspective of planning literature",
abstract = "The wide spread disbelief and frustrations amongst managers and executives about planning theories do not seem to be caused only by the confusions over concepts and terminology, but also by the absence of a perspective of planning literature from the view point of comprehensive planning behaviour of an individual and an organization. In this paper, to explore the relationships between the concepts discussed in the planning literature, we first briefly review an hypothesis of planning behaviour which we have introduced before (Section 2), and then develop, under the framework of the hypothesis, the dimensions and subdimensions employed in an analysis (Section 3.1). Having listed the {"}sample{"} planning literature for the analysis (Section 3.3), the results are shown in the form of tables (Section 3.3). Finally, comments and discussions are made on the methodological problems, on the variety and relative mutual independence between planning concepts, on the normative vs descriptive balance of planning research, on the necessary and possibly fertile areas of future planning research, and on the relation of the analysis to the status of our hypothesis (Section 4).",
author = "Takehiko Matsuda and Masaaki Hirano",
year = "1983",
doi = "10.1016/0377-2217(83)90217-5",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "138--145",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A perspective of planning literature

AU - Matsuda, Takehiko

AU - Hirano, Masaaki

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - The wide spread disbelief and frustrations amongst managers and executives about planning theories do not seem to be caused only by the confusions over concepts and terminology, but also by the absence of a perspective of planning literature from the view point of comprehensive planning behaviour of an individual and an organization. In this paper, to explore the relationships between the concepts discussed in the planning literature, we first briefly review an hypothesis of planning behaviour which we have introduced before (Section 2), and then develop, under the framework of the hypothesis, the dimensions and subdimensions employed in an analysis (Section 3.1). Having listed the "sample" planning literature for the analysis (Section 3.3), the results are shown in the form of tables (Section 3.3). Finally, comments and discussions are made on the methodological problems, on the variety and relative mutual independence between planning concepts, on the normative vs descriptive balance of planning research, on the necessary and possibly fertile areas of future planning research, and on the relation of the analysis to the status of our hypothesis (Section 4).

AB - The wide spread disbelief and frustrations amongst managers and executives about planning theories do not seem to be caused only by the confusions over concepts and terminology, but also by the absence of a perspective of planning literature from the view point of comprehensive planning behaviour of an individual and an organization. In this paper, to explore the relationships between the concepts discussed in the planning literature, we first briefly review an hypothesis of planning behaviour which we have introduced before (Section 2), and then develop, under the framework of the hypothesis, the dimensions and subdimensions employed in an analysis (Section 3.1). Having listed the "sample" planning literature for the analysis (Section 3.3), the results are shown in the form of tables (Section 3.3). Finally, comments and discussions are made on the methodological problems, on the variety and relative mutual independence between planning concepts, on the normative vs descriptive balance of planning research, on the necessary and possibly fertile areas of future planning research, and on the relation of the analysis to the status of our hypothesis (Section 4).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020704498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020704498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0377-2217(83)90217-5

DO - 10.1016/0377-2217(83)90217-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0020704498

VL - 12

SP - 138

EP - 145

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 2

ER -