TY - JOUR
T1 - Britain's decision to withdraw from the Persian Gulf, 1964-68
T2 - A pattern and a puzzle
AU - Sato, Shohei
N1 - Funding Information:
I am immensely grateful for all the comments and support provided during various stages of this project by Avi Shlaim, Roham Alvandi, Alexander Buck, Thomas Williams, Retsu Hashizume, Joydeep Sen, Lee Jones, Christopher Prior, Yuzo Shitomi, Daisuke Ikemoto, Kobayashi Michinao, Otsuka Osamu, Shibuya Yuki, Noriyuki Osada, James Piscatori, Siham Yousef Al-Qaradawi, Habibur Rahman, Sawai Kazuaki, James Onley, Philip Robins, Simon C. Smith, Richard Stanley, Noriko Kanahara, Mei Zhang, Robert Johnson, Matteo Legrenzi, Warwick Knowles, Steven Wright, N. Janardhan, Frances Gillespie, Chris Evans, Magda Rostron, Ahmed Bin Jasssim A. Al Muftah and the anonymous referee(s) of this journal. This research has been enabled by the generous financial support of the Swire Centenary and Cathay Pacific Scholarship, the Academic Research Grant Program of the University of Tokyo, the Cyril Foster and the departmental funds of the Department of Politics and International Relations, Oxford, and the Carr Fund and the Peter Fitzpatrick Travel Scholarship of St Antony’s College, Oxford. All errors are mine.
Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Can we comprehend the end of the British Empire as a planned and logical process, or was it an accumulation of improvised decisions? Britain exercised significant influence over the southern coast of the Persian Gulf from the nineteenth century until January 1968, when it announced that it would withdraw its troops from the region. This withdrawal marked an end to Britain's overt influence in the Gulf, and led to the eventual emergence of Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates as full members of international society. This paper examines Britain's decision-making process that led to the withdrawal announcement. It argues that the withdrawal option was put under the spotlight in the context of the long-term economic retrenchment and rise of anti-imperialist voices, but that the final decision was inspired largely by contingent domestic political considerations. In contrast to the prevailing view that the withdrawal decision was taken by July 1967 as a result of Britain's effort to bring the ends of its foreign policy into line with the means, this paper highlights the more spontaneous aspect of the whole process. An examination of the sources suggests that the decision was reached only a few days before the announcement in January 1968, more as a justification for reducing domestic social expenditure than as a foreign policy initiative.
AB - Can we comprehend the end of the British Empire as a planned and logical process, or was it an accumulation of improvised decisions? Britain exercised significant influence over the southern coast of the Persian Gulf from the nineteenth century until January 1968, when it announced that it would withdraw its troops from the region. This withdrawal marked an end to Britain's overt influence in the Gulf, and led to the eventual emergence of Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates as full members of international society. This paper examines Britain's decision-making process that led to the withdrawal announcement. It argues that the withdrawal option was put under the spotlight in the context of the long-term economic retrenchment and rise of anti-imperialist voices, but that the final decision was inspired largely by contingent domestic political considerations. In contrast to the prevailing view that the withdrawal decision was taken by July 1967 as a result of Britain's effort to bring the ends of its foreign policy into line with the means, this paper highlights the more spontaneous aspect of the whole process. An examination of the sources suggests that the decision was reached only a few days before the announcement in January 1968, more as a justification for reducing domestic social expenditure than as a foreign policy initiative.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349090042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349090042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03086530902757738
DO - 10.1080/03086530902757738
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70349090042
SN - 0308-6534
VL - 37
SP - 99
EP - 117
JO - Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
JF - Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
IS - 1
ER -